(This limitation does not apply to the CPS involvement and
child language outcomes, which were based primarily on independent measures.)
And this particular type of talk with children in the toddler / preschool age range was more predictive of
child language outcomes than the quantity of talk or other types of talk, and it wiped out the effect of quantity in the statistical models.
Recent studies have shown that fathers» language input and vocabulary spoken to infants and young children may also be a predictor of
child language outcomes.27 — 29
Participating children had higher rates of high - school completion, lower rates of grade retention and special education placement, and a lower rate of juvenile arrests.32 Another example showing more intensive programming has larger impacts is the Healthy Steps evaluation showing significantly better
child language outcomes when the program was initiated prenatally through 24 months.33 These studies suggest that a more intensive intervention involving the child directly may be required for larger effects to be seen.
Not exact matches
And in some instances, it has been Scalia and Thomas who have done so more than those who may think of themselves less as originalists (in one recent case in particular Scalia and Thomas dissented from the majority which held that convicted
child molesters could be indefinitely imprisoned despite having fully served their sentences based on subtle shifts of
language and the over-application of prior case law — no one wants a
child molester free and about, but such results focused
outcomes are always dangerous).
The poems are relentless in documenting the
outcome: Native
children forcibly removed from their families to boarding schools, forbidden to speak their own
language, subjected to a bureaucratic regime with a toxic mix of condescension and missionary zeal.
Fathers» involvement in parenting is associated with positive cognitive, developmental, and socio - behavioural
child outcomes such as improved weight gain in preterm infants, improved breastfeeding rates, higher receptive
language skills, and higher academic achievement [33].
They specifically measured the infants» ability to understand
language at 7 months, and later the
children's vocabulary
outcomes at age 2.
«This is important because timely identification of hearing loss can enable earlier intervention, which is linked to better
language outcomes for
children.»
Thus, although both groups may post lower rates of school readiness, Hispanic
children from Spanish - speaking homes face the additional challenge of learning the
language of the classroom, making them especially vulnerable to poor academic
outcomes.
She said testing multilingual
children for speech and
language disorders with monolingual tests damaged learning
outcomes.
Catherine Snow is an expert on
language and literacy development in
children, focusing on how oral
language skills are acquired and how they relate to literacy
outcomes.
It's a means of ensuring that our least fortunate
children have access to the enabling knowledge and vocabulary that is the foundation of
language proficiency, critical thinking, problem solving, and every other big picture academic
outcome we seek for our least advantaged
children.
It is clear that variation in bilingual experience is associated with
children's
language and cognitive development, which indirectly influence academic
outcomes.
The effects of fathers» and mothers» reading to their
children on
language outcomes of
children participating in Early Head Start in the United States.
We look separately at the effects on the
outcomes of Haitian - born incumbent students, other immigrant students, U.S. - born Haitian Creole speakers, other U.S. - born black students, other U.S. - born non-black students, limited English proficient students, those who are not English
language learners,
children with mothers who have less than a high school diploma,
children with mothers who have a high school diploma but no other education, and
children whose mothers attended college.
The role of speech pathologists in the early identification of
children with
language problems which could lead to interventions which might prevent or ameliorate subsequent reading problems was noted, and the LDA submission put the view that more routine collaboration between speech pathologists and educators could improve literacy
outcomes for all students.
We stand by their endeavors to secure school finance reform and improve education
outcomes and opportunities for our public school
children, especially those who are at - risk, English
language learners, and students with disabilities and other special needs.
The coalition came together to push for school finance reform and improved educational opportunities and
outcomes for Nevada public school
children, especially those students who are at - risk, English
language learners, gifted and talented, and students with disabilities or other special needs.
5:14 Dr. Montecel explains the three premises on which the framework is based: (1) The problem is systemic (2) Achieving student success requires developing a vision of seeking
outcomes for all
children, no matter where they come from, the color of their skin, and the
language they speak.
Classroom Promotion of Oral
Language (CPOL): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school - based intervention to improve
children's literacy
outcomes at grade 3, oral
language and
The study found that Georgia's Pre-K Program produces significant positive
outcomes for
children, regardless of family income level or English
language skills.
This
outcome measures how
children learn and use basic
language and communication skills such as counting and problem solving that will prepare them to be successful in kindergarten.
Study after study has consistently demonstrated that a
child's growth in key domains — including social and emotional learning,
language and literacy, mathematics, and approaches to learning — correlates to long - term education
outcomes.
Imagine if Connecticut's elected and appointed officials actually stopped denigrating teachers, the teaching profession and public schools and started listening to teachers and providing the resources necessary to improve educational
outcomes, especially for Connecticut
children living in poverty, facing English
language challenges or requiring special education services.
Best Practices for Supporting Teachers and Administrators to Improve
Outcomes for Dual Language Learners in PK - Grade 3 highlights research on training DLL teachers, describes best practices for teachers and administrators to support development of English and children's home language, shares a tool for coaching and professional development of teachers, and discusses policy trends and recommendations for improving outcomes of dual language learner c
Outcomes for Dual
Language Learners in PK - Grade 3 highlights research on training DLL teachers, describes best practices for teachers and administrators to support development of English and
children's home
language, shares a tool for coaching and professional development of teachers, and discusses policy trends and recommendations for improving
outcomes of dual language learner c
outcomes of dual
language learner
children.
Compounding this problem,
children from low - income families, on average, begin kindergarten approximately a year behind their peers in preliteracy and
language skills.106 This fluency gap widens as students continue in school and has a significant impact on economic success later in life.107 As a result, gains from high - quality preschool programs — including improved health, better social - emotional skills, and better cognitive
outcomes — are particularly beneficial for
children from low - income families.108
This presentation looks at the rates in which
children who are Hispanic and / or English
language learners enroll in preschool and the impact of pre-K on their learning
outcomes.
Summary: (To include comparison groups,
outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Children and foster parents were randomly assigned to receive the Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch - up (ABC) intervention or to a comparison group which received the Developmental Education for Families (DEF) program which focuses on cognitive and
language development.
Summary: (To include comparison groups,
outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Children and foster parents were randomly assigned to receive with the Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch - up (ABC) intervention or to a comparison group which received the Developmental Education for Families (DEF) program which focuses on cognitive and
language development.
Experiences in the first 1000 days of life have a crucial influence on
child development and health.1 Appropriate early
child development (including physical, social and emotional,
language and cognitive domains) has consistently been shown to be associated with good health and educational
outcomes in childhood and consequent health and employment
outcomes in adulthood.2 — 4 Adopting a life course approach, including early intervention, is essential, 5 and investment is therefore needed in effective prenatal and postnatal services to optimise
child health, well - being and developmental resilience.6
Parent responsivity: the construct of responsivity incorporates both bonding with the
child and promoting
language (ie, is also related to the home learning environment (the third primary
outcome)-RRB-.
Outcome measures Level of developmental vulnerability in Australian
children for five developmental domains: physical well - being, social competence, emotional maturity,
language and cognitive skills and communication skills and general knowledge.
Existing SNHV trials show relatively modest effects (effect sizes of 0.2 — 0.4 SDs) for
outcomes such as
child mental health and behaviour, and cognitive and
language development, from infancy to mid - childhood.19 While effect sizes of 0.25 — 0.3 SDs can be meaningful and impactful at the whole of population level, 59 targeted public health interventions such as SNHV include a cost and intensity such that larger effects in the short - to - medium term might be necessary to justify implementation at a population level.
Children's
language development was tested at 21 months in their homes.40 Their mental development (Mental Development Index [MDI]-RRB- was tested at 24 months in the laboratory.41
Language and MDI were analyzed as both continuous and dichotomous
outcomes.
Children who experience poverty, particularly during early life or for an extended period, are at risk of a host of adverse health and developmental
outcomes through their life course.1 Poverty has a profound effect on specific circumstances, such as birth weight, infant mortality,
language development, chronic illness, environmental exposure, nutrition, and injury.
Our findings add insight into the pathways linking early childhood adversity to poor adult wellbeing.29 Complementing past work that focused on physical health, 9 our findings provide information about links between ACEs and early childhood
outcomes at the intersection of learning, behavior, and health.29 We found that ACEs experienced in early childhood were associated with poor foundational skills, such as
language and literacy, that predispose individuals to low educational attainment and adult literacy, both of which are related to poor health.23, 30 — 33 Attention problems, social problems, and aggression were also associated with ACEs and also have the potential to interfere with
children's educational experience given known associations between self - regulatory behavior and academic achievement.34, 35 Consistent with the original ACE study and subsequent research, we found that exposure to more ACEs was associated with more adverse
outcomes, suggesting a dose — response association.3 — 8 In fact, experiencing ≥ 3 ACEs was associated with below - average performance or problems in every
outcome examined.
To account for norms used in scoring
language outcomes, these were also adjusted for the
child's sex and age at the time of the assessment.
Results were summarised for
child development (behaviour, cognitive development, psychomotor development and communication /
language) and parent —
child relationship (relationship, sensitivity and attachment classification)
outcomes for the following assessment times: postintervention (PI — immediately after intervention ending), short - term (ST — less than 6 months after intervention ending), medium - term (MT — 7 — 12 months after intervention ending) and long - term (LT — more than 12 months after intervention ending) follow - up.
The study found dads reading to
children at 2 years improves the
child's
language outcomes at 4 years of age.
a stronger focus on the
outcomes that
children and young people with speech,
language and communication needs achieve
Outcomes consisted of women's number and timing of subsequent pregnancies, months of employment, use of welfare, food stamps, and Medicaid, educational achievement, behavioral problems attributable to the use of substances, rates of marriage and cohabitation, and duration of relationships with partners and their
children's behavior problems, responses to story stems, intellectual functioning, receptive
language, and academic achievement.
The first 5 years of life are critical for the development of
language and cognitive skills.1 By kindergarten entry, steep social gradients in reading and math ability, with successively poorer
outcomes for
children in families of lower social class, are already apparent.2 — 4 Early cognitive ability is, in turn, predictive of later school performance, educational attainment, and health in adulthood5 — 7 and may serve as a marker for the quality of early brain development and a mechanism for the transmission of future health inequalities.8 Early life represents a time period of most equality and yet, beginning with in utero conditions and extending through early childhood, a wide range of socially stratified risk and protective factors may begin to place
children on different trajectories of cognitive development.9, 10
Additionally, we hypothesize that
children whose caregivers learn how to engage them in high - quality interactions will have better
language outcomes relative to their peers in the control group, measured by standardized assessments, parent - report vocabulary checklist and
language - sampling analysis.
The partnership is designing a pilot intervention focused on increasing the quality of caregiver -
child interactions to strengthen
children's communication foundation and improve their
language outcomes.
Research has suggested that increasing the amount of
child - directed speech enhances
language outcomes.
Compared to control groups, babies of parents enrolled prenatally in home visiting programs had better birth
outcomes, and the programs were found to have a positive impact on breastfeeding and immunization rates., In other randomized trials, participating
children were found to have a reduction in
language delays at 21 months, reductions in mental health problems, fewer behavior problems, and increased mental development.
For other
outcomes there was no statistically significant relationship with poverty duration, including being overweight (
child cohort only), having accidents or injuries (birth cohort only), and concerns with
language development (
child cohort only).
These programs have been critical in improving maternal and
child health
outcomes in the early years, leaving long - lasting, positive impacts on parenting skills;
children's cognitive,
language, and social - emotional development; and school readiness.
4.1 The duration of poverty and
child outcomes 4.1.1 Body Mass Index 4.1.2 Number of accidents / injuries 4.1.3 Child speech and language development 4.1.4 General development 4.1.5 Social, emotional and behavioural difficulties 4.1.6 Multiple outcomes 4.2 The association between the duration of poverty and child out
child outcomes 4.1.1 Body Mass Index 4.1.2 Number of accidents / injuries 4.1.3
Child speech and language development 4.1.4 General development 4.1.5 Social, emotional and behavioural difficulties 4.1.6 Multiple outcomes 4.2 The association between the duration of poverty and child out
Child speech and
language development 4.1.4 General development 4.1.5 Social, emotional and behavioural difficulties 4.1.6 Multiple
outcomes 4.2 The association between the duration of poverty and
child out
child outcomes