Sentences with phrase «child outcome variables»

Among the various biological and psychosocial risk factors, maternal mental health problems, maternal educational status, and a small number of close social relationships correlated significantly with child outcome variables.

Not exact matches

Which parenting variable had more impact on child outcomes?

where Yis alternatively represents an outcome — academic achievement, cognitive ability, and academic effort — for the ith child and in school s. Asianis is a dichotomous variable indicating that child i is Asian (vs. white).

These outcomes have been achieved through SEL's impact on important mental health variables that improve children's social relationships, increase their attachment to school and motivation to learn, and reduce antisocial, violent, and drug - using behaviors.

The factors that contribute to the outcome of the test are extremely variable: did the child sleep well, does the child receive support and assistance from the parents at home, is English spoken at home, is the child from a stable environment, does the child have proper nutrition for cognitive success, does the child have learning disabilities or challenges or suffer from test anxiety... and so on.

For divorcing families throughout Orlando, our child support lawyers apply the statewide formula to estimate the child support amounts for each unique situation, and pay close attention to the many variables that shape the outcome.

Consistent with a hypothesis that data are missing at random, several baseline demographic, but not outcome, variables predicted missingness including marital status (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4), parent age (OR = 0.92), child age (OR = 1.96), and non-white or Hispanic race / ethnicity (OR = 2.6).

These associations were significantly moderated by theoretically and methodologically relevant variables, with patterns of moderation found to vary somewhat with each child outcome.

We also hypothesized that key variables associated with poverty and known to negatively impact child development outcomes, including caregiving support, caregiver education, and stressful life events, would mediate the association between poverty and brain volumes.

Because maternal trait anxiety was highly correlated with a multitude of the study's dependent variables (eg, mother's depression and child outcomes), it also was used as a covariate in subsequent data analyses.

The role of parental relationship quality It has long been recognized in the research on divorced parents that the quality of parents» relationships (for example, how well they get along and how much conflict they experience) would be a key intervening variable explaining links between divorce or separation and poorer child outcomes.

This is supported by Szatmari's work in Canada, which showed that family dysfunction and, for boys, service needs disappeared as significant variables associated with ADHD when comorbidity for other disorders were factored in, of which by the far the most common was CD.31 Unsurprisingly, abused children with ADHD have poorer outcomes in adulthood, but that could have several alternative explanations as there are many confounders that could account for these differences in outcome.

It has been shown that inferences resulting from this analysis are virtually identical no matter which of these outcome measures is used.30 In addition to the covariates previously noted, the regression analysis was repeated to include annual household income, mother's treatment setting (primary vs psychiatric outpatient care), and treatment status of child during the 3 - month follow - up period in order to investigate the further potential confounding effects of these variables.

The MSI was created to provide a single primary outcome variable when studying children with major mood disorders.

Baumrindà cents â «¬ â «cents s typology portrays parenting as something analogous to fixed personality traits (or the fixed child social competence traits used as the outcome variables in her research).

Similar to the ACE Study analyses, for each outcome variable, a binary logistic regression was applied to test the relationship of the adversity index score (0, 1, 2, 3, or ≥ 4) to the outcome, after entering the control variables (child's sex, child's race / ethnicity, caregiver's marital status, and family income).

The caregiver's overall assessment of the child's health and serious illness in the past year at the interview at age 6 years was used to assess the outcome variables.

We estimated models by using dependent variables previously associated with significant treatment effects in the follow - up study.10, 20 These included life - course outcomes for the mother, such as number of subsequent children, months on welfare, impairments due to substance use, and number of arrests, as well as life - course outcomes for the study children, such as number of runaway episodes and number of arrests or convictions.

When these demographic variables were not included, only two of the 14 outcomes variables were statistically significant (at p < 0.05): children's physical health was better in comparison sites than in CfC sites, and the reverse was true for maternal mental health at wave 1.

The primary outcome variables for this analysis were the number of substantiated reports over the entire 15 - year period involving the study child regardless of the identity of the perpetrator or involving the mother as perpetrator regardless of the identity of the child.

Characteristics of Four Kinship Placement Outcome Groups and Variables Associated With These Kinship Placement Outcome Groups Chang & Liles Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24 (6), 2007 Investigates factors that might be associated with the disruptions in kinship care of abused and neglected children, characteristics of the children such as their health status, ages, and the extent to which they were getting into «trouble» were significantly associated with outcomes.

We found no associations between child involvement and other treatment variables, however, it is not entirely clear what role child and parent involvement played and it would be useful for studies to look at the relative merits of child alone vs. family - wide involvement in the FDP as a measure of treatment outcome and process.

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) The aim of this study was to conduct a evaluation of the effectiveness of Circle of Security - Parenting (COS - P), with mothers in residential substance abuse treatment and (b) to examine what demographic variables, including other risk factors for child maltreatment, may influence the impact of the program with these mothers.

Which parenting variable had more impact on child outcomes?

When the dashed line falls below the solid line this indicates a reduction in the strength of association between family adversity and child health when parenting variables are added to the model suggesting that differences in parenting across families with different levels of adversity explain some of the inequalities in child health outcomes.

Second, we will enter explanatory variables into the models to determine which factors have the most influence on outcomes and inequalities in these outcomes between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children.

Table 3.4 summarises the relationships between maternal mental health and the selected child development outcomes that continued to show a significant independent relationship after controlling for variables with were related to each other.

Finally, although a large number of family background variables were controlled for in our analysis there may be many more that can impact on children's outcomes.

Table 6.6 Relationship between maternal health and drivers of child outcomes controlling for other variables

The dependent variable for each model is the relevant driver of child outcomes named in the column headings, the separation event and the sweep 1 measure of the driver are listed down the left and the arrows indicate the direction of any significant association.

However, they reflect a broad spread of factors of policy concern and are all likely to be of interest as explanatory variables for later outcomes once the children reach adulthood.

Table 5.6 Relationship between job loss and drivers of child outcomes controlling for other variables

When the dashed line falls below the solid line this indicates a reduction in the strength of association between family adversity and child health when parenting variables are added to the model suggesting that differences in parenting across families with different levels of adversity explain some of the inequalities in that health outcome.

These outcomes have been achieved through SEL's impact on important mental health variables that improve children's social relationships, increase their attachment to school and motivation to learn, and reduce antisocial, violent, and drug - using behaviors.

Parenting is a proximal variable in the causal pathway to adverse outcomes in childhood and adolescence, of which material disadvantage and economic hardship are distal variables.32 Behavioural problems and temper tantrums among young children have been shown to increase as a result of parenting changes associated with economic hardship.33 Economic deprivation has also been associated with decreased respect for the father and increased dependence on peer group for adolescent boys, and lowered feelings of self adequacy and reduced goal aspirations for adolescent girls.15 Economic hardship appears to have direct and indirect effects on adolescent functioning.

The three treatment conditions were comparable on all child and parent demographic and outcome variables collected at baseline.

[xviii], [xix] In fact, the quality of the father - child relationship is the single variable that is most consistently linked to positive life outcomes.

For these four subgroups, SRI identified variables related to child characteristics and child outcomes, as well as family and program factors that mediate between the two.

Parent - child interactions affect many different domains of development.41, 42,43 Child - focused, responsive and moderately controlling parenting attitudes have been positively associated with self - esteem, academic achievement, cognitive development and fewer behaviour problems.44, 45 Furthermore, high warmth and contingent responsiveness promote a wide range of positive developmental outcomes.46, 47,48,49 Parental management style and affective involvement may be especially salient for children's prosocial development, self - control and internalization of behaviour standards.41 The quality of parenting has been found to be important for child socialization, 50,51 and parenting variables show direct links with child adjustmechild interactions affect many different domains of development.41, 42,43 Child - focused, responsive and moderately controlling parenting attitudes have been positively associated with self - esteem, academic achievement, cognitive development and fewer behaviour problems.44, 45 Furthermore, high warmth and contingent responsiveness promote a wide range of positive developmental outcomes.46, 47,48,49 Parental management style and affective involvement may be especially salient for children's prosocial development, self - control and internalization of behaviour standards.41 The quality of parenting has been found to be important for child socialization, 50,51 and parenting variables show direct links with child adjustmeChild - focused, responsive and moderately controlling parenting attitudes have been positively associated with self - esteem, academic achievement, cognitive development and fewer behaviour problems.44, 45 Furthermore, high warmth and contingent responsiveness promote a wide range of positive developmental outcomes.46, 47,48,49 Parental management style and affective involvement may be especially salient for children's prosocial development, self - control and internalization of behaviour standards.41 The quality of parenting has been found to be important for child socialization, 50,51 and parenting variables show direct links with child adjustmechild socialization, 50,51 and parenting variables show direct links with child adjustmechild adjustment.52

This strategy was used to examine the unique contribution of the parental variables after controlling for the observed influences of child demographic and disease variables on the child outcomes.

Children's level of conduct problems (ECBI) immediately post intervention was the outcome variable in all models.

The total score was entered as the child adaptability outcome score, dependent variable.

Other variables (maternal parity, housing stability, hospitalization, perceived health status, employment, use of the Women, Infants, and Children Supplemental Nutrition Program, and cigarette smoking; whether the mother was living with a partner; and infant gestational age, birth weight, need for transfer to an intensive care nursery, health insurance, special needs, health status as perceived by the mother, and age at the time of the survey) were included if the adjusted odds ratio differed from the crude odds ratio by at least 10 %, which is a well - accepted method of confounder selection when the decision of whether to adjust is unclear.42, 43 Any variable associated with both the predictor (depression) and the outcome (infant health services use, parenting practices, or injury - prevention measures) at P <.25, as suggested by Mickey and Greenland, 42 was also included.

A recent meta - analysis showed that low family socio - economic status is associated with higher levels of children's antisocial behaviours, and indicated that this relationship is stronger when CU traits are considered as outcome variables [72].

Preliminary analyses indicated no significant associations between demographic variables and the treatment outcome variables (i.e., parenting measures, child EBP).

Table 1 contains the descriptives for the psychological measures analyzed in this study for children at ages 3 and 5 (mean and standard deviations for the quantitative variables and prevalences for binary outcomes).

However, analysis of regression structure coefficients (child report of adherence rs =.67, parent report of adherence rs =.59), which are not suppressed or inflated by collinearity, demonstrates that beta weights for adherence are low because of multicollinearity between predictors, not poor relations with the outcome variable.

They showed that, even with the effects of chronic stress statistically controlled, there were still differences in the psychosocial outcome variables among groups, and there was particular impairment in children of unipolar mothers [30].

Of particular note, parental attitudes and adjustment, quality of the parent — child attachment, and the presence of parenting and coping skills constitute proximal variables that were better predictors of child outcomes than the frequency or severity of the stressor event (Palmer 2008).

Like the family environment, many studies have focused on the marital relationship as an outcome variable of family adaptation, indicating less marital satisfaction in mothers of children with ASD in comparison to mothers of children with other disorders [56, 69], and less positive expression within the marital relationship [45].