[12] The claimant relies on the discussion of the inclusion of all or part of corporate pre-tax income for
child support purposes in Hausmann v. Klukas, 2009 BCCA 32.
Is subchapter S Corporation income used to pay taxes still income for
child support purposes if the parent has a controlling interest in the S Corporation?
Is subchapter S Corporation income used to pay taxes still income
for child support purposes if the parent does not have a controlling interest in the S Corporation?
Next, the court observed that for
child support purposes, gifts received by a parent are not presumed to be part of part of his or her presumptive annual income; however, under the Child Support Guidelines, the court had discretion to impute income if it was considered appropriate in the circumstances.
Similarly, a gain in value on an unsold family home or house proceeds from sale used to buy a new family home are unlikely to be viewed by courts as a source of income for Surrey spousal and
child support purposes.
Whether you are a birthmother seeking to establish paternity for
child support purposes, a non-custodial father pursuing visitation rights, or an alleged father seeking to refute paternity, you don't want to try and represent yourself in a paternity determination.
The Tennessee Court of Appeals issued a decision in May 2006 that addresses the lingering question of whether gains from the sale of marital property may be included in income for
child support purposes: the old «double dip» dilemma.
This article explains why and how courts impute income for
child support purposes in New Mexico.
This article will explain when and how courts impute income for
child support purposes in North Dakota.
When a support payor is self - employed, a court may determine that certain deductions from the payor's income or business be added back into the payor's declared income in order determine his / her income for
child support purposes.
For example, if a parent stops showing up to work and gets fired, the court may still impute the income that parent was earning before getting fired for
child support purposes.
When a support payor is self - employed, a court may determine that certain personal deductions from the payor's income or business be added back into the payor's declared income, and grossed up for tax, in order determine his / her income for
child support purposes.
In addition, he may be asked to determine the business owner's income for spousal and
child support purposes.
Section 16 sets out a presumption that a spouse's annual income for
child support purposes shall be determined from the sources of income set out in Revenue Canada's T1 General tax return form («Line 150» income).
The petition also requests information concerning who will be responsible for the child's expenses — such as health care premiums — and current financial information for both parents for
child support purposes.
The guidelines combine the net income of both parents to produce a total amount of net weekly income that Connecticut considers available for
child support purposes.
This form includes information such as the names and addresses of the parents and child, proposed visitation schedule and financial information for
child support purposes.
Include the names and birth dates of each child you will be supporting and identify how they are treated for
child support purposes.
The way you calculate income for
child support purposes may be different from the way you would calculate income for tax purposes.
In D.C., regardless of whether there are minor children [for custody and
child support purposes, in D.C., the age of (effective) «majority» is 21]-- after the physical separation has been by mutual consent for a period of six continuous months (also, without intervening «cohabitation»), either party may file for divorce on the no - fault ground; otherwise, the «waiting period» is one year in D.C., also.
This is usually the parent we refer to as the custodial parent for
child support purposes.
Based on the information gathered I can make a case to the court that he has earned a certain amount of money in the past and that the court should impute a similar wage to him for
child support purposes.
For
child support purposes, these terms refer to the time the child spends with each parent.
Remember, the terms used here are for
child support purposes.
For
child support purposes, net resources equals the total earnings, minus Social Security taxes, income taxes for a single person, the child's portion of the health insurance, cash medical support, union dues, and non-discretionary retirement contributions if the obligor does not pay Social Security taxes.
Some states, like Utah, have specific criteria defining joint physical custody, at least for
child support purposes.
A common misconception in family law cases relates to RRSP proceeds, and whether they're considered income for
child support purposes, says Toronto family lawyer Ron... Read more
An overnight for
child support purposes is «more than 12 hours» or the majority of a 24 - hour day.
A common misconception in family law cases relates to RRSP proceeds, and whether they're considered income for
child support purposes, says Toronto family lawyer Ron Shulman.
The parent covering the child - care costs through child support may deduct the amount from their income when calculating income for
child support purposes.
Parenting time concerns a sole parenting schedule for
child support purposes or a shared parenting plan.