It is an important issue and if you look around, the fanatics are the ones who put their faith in theories like evolution and they are forcing themselves on every aspect of life and Bill said it himself, he wants
your child taught evolution and the evolutionist will fight to indoctinate every child.
Not exact matches
(i) a woman's right to choose; (ii)
teaching evolution in school; (iii) medical immunization of teen girls against HPV; (iv) assisted suicide; (v) gay marriage; (vi) my right to view art and theatre deemed «offensive,» «blasphemous» or «obscene» by theists (vii) basic $ ex education for older school
children; (viii) treating drug abuse as principally a medical issue; (xi) population control; (x) buying alcohol on a Sunday; (xi) use of condoms and other contraceptives (xii) stem cell research.
Education... creationism would supplant
evolution, all sciences that could possibly come in conflict with creationism would be forbidden, all
children would be required to pray and be educated in fundamentalist Christianity, women teachers would not be permitted to
teach males, girls only, etc..
(CNN)- Bill Nye's viral YouTube video pleading with parents not to
teach their
children to deny
evolution has spawned an online life of its own, with prominent creationists hitting back against the popular TV host.
Sad when people want lies like a «young earth» and that «
evolution is a myth» or that «some god caused» the big bang
taught to their
children in their schools, paid for by their tax dollars.
Your comment indicates that you don't understand
evolution and would have benefited from more
teaching on the subject as a
child.
No, he wants
children taught about
evolution.
If religion and
evolution were
taught to
children until the age of 18 by an unbiased person and let people decide for themselfs, I wonder how many religious people there would be.
It's also hypocritical because they [atheism] are shoving down their beliefs into our
children and young adults,
teaching that
evolution is the answer.
Evolution is not good for our
children - it
teaches them that they are no more than monkey - brains, when in truth, each one was lovingly constructed by a God Who needs each individual for HIS purpose, not yours.
(CNN)- Bill Nye does not think that
children should be
taught to deny
evolution, and a YouTube video of him explaining why has gone viral.
Ham writes that Nye is joining in with other evolutionists who say
teaching children to deny
evolution is a form of «
child abuse.»
You are exhibit A for why we need to
teach evolution to our
children — if we don't they might end up with your poor understanding of science.
If the parents don't like
evolution and want their
child to be
taught creationism then there are plenty of private schools that
child can go to.
For this reason I have realized this: a chimpanzee does not understand math (regardless of how many hours I spent trying to
teach them this) because of it's anatomy, yet I do understand math because of my anatomy (and education of course), I as a mere mortal (unlike yourself) know that my faculties must be somehow limited and that there are concepts that no matter how much I try to use my retarded brain I will never understand them because I don't have the god lobe in the ole brain like you do, none the less I keep on thinkin» in a finite fashion hoping that my future
children might have a little more range than I since they too will be a «tarded snapshot in a timeline of cognitive
evolution.
My
children are
taught evolution.
Those questions do matter because if you have failed to
teach your
children that LGBT are born that way and that
evolution / big bang are fact then you have lied to them and thus failed them... no decent parent lies to such a horrific extreme to their
children.
- Those questions do matter because if you have failed to
teach your
children that LGBT are born that way and that
evolution / big bang are fact then you have lied to them and thus failed them... no decent parent lies to such a horrific extreme to their
children.
But it's much more likely, based on the evidence we have and continue to gather, that natural
evolution is what brought us to life as we know it, and that without
teaching that or
teaching it saddled with another totally unprovable theory, our
children will have no basis for understanding life sciences.
Volume IX, Number 2 Wellsprings of the Art of Education: Three Reversals in the Work of the Waldorf Teacher — Christof Wiechert Discovering the True Nature of Educational Assessment — Paul Zachos The Kindergarten
Child — Peter Lang The
Teaching of Science — David Mitchell
Evolution of Consciousness, Rites of Passage, and the Waldorf Curriculum — Alduino Mazzone
When
children are
taught about
evolution, for example, they should explore both Darwin's ideas and the Christian viewpoint.
The researchers examined respondents» deference to science on a scale of 0 - 10 when it came to 14 policy issues, including
child vaccinations, stem cell research, global warming,
child obesity and diet, AIDS prevention, birth control education, legalizing drug use, gun control, regulation of nuclear power, animal testing, and
teaching evolution in schools.
We're
teaching our
children to not use their jaws, causing devolution (the opposite of
evolution) of their palates and jaws, and they need those strong muscles and wide palates to break down fibrous whole foods.
Working predominantly under the sunlight of Pennsylvania and Maine with models who are most often her own three
children, Madigan seeks to find «the essential truth in the
teachings of nature; death and life as a continuum; the temporary nature of the body; and the struggle between human desire and spiritual
evolution.»