Sentences with phrase «child violates these rules»

If your child violates these rules or tries to get sneaky with you, you need to make sure there are consequences.

When your child violates your rules, it is not easy for you to calm down, breathe and not shout; rather it requires all your parenting strength and love to deal with things in a different way.

Not exact matches

The court ruled against SCHOOL SPONSORED PRAYER because it violated the rights of children in the classroom who believed differently than the SCHOOL SPONSORED PRAYER.

My critics reject the argument that the ruling violates the religious liberty rights of Jews and Muslims; they maintain that, on the contrary, infant circumcision violates the rights of children to bodily integrity and religious liberty, since they can not consent to being circumcised.

Parents know that the best way to raise children is to tell them the rules and then give immediate certain punishment if the rules are violated.

The Los Angeles Times: Scientology did not violate forced labor law, appeals court rules Scientology did not violate a labor law by failing to pay for the work of two former members of the church's Sea Organization - a wing that restricts participants» outside communications, marriage and children, censors mail and monitors phone calls - a federal appeals court said Tuesday.

According to England Santa Claus has broken almost every rule in the book and violated numerous food, drug, facility registration and import laws, regulations and standards over the years as he has illegally imported millions of dollars worth of merchandise to children in the United States, albeit as gifts.

A report to be debated by the Methodist Conference in Southport on 29 June 2015 relates that Nestlé continues to systematically violate baby milk marketing rules, citing expert sources Save the Children and the International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN).

If the child violates any kind of rules, then the parents and children together decide the form of punishment in this style of parenting.

In my opinion (and keep in mind I'm not a lawyer), the heart of the ruling comes down to one major thing: if your child is in danger, you have a right to protect them, even if it violates the privacy rights of another party.

I hope Howard Dean and Harold Ickes (who was one of the major architects of stripping MI and FL of their delegates) do not have small children because their ridiculous version of solving this problem by going back on what they said the consequences of moving up their primaries would be violates Rule number one of parenting — mean what you say.

This attitude and position expressed by Chervenak et al is outrageous and completely unacceptable, and violates many rulings by the US Supreme Court which found that adult persons may not be compelled even to donate blood to save the life of their child, let alone undergo surgery or any other intervention.

A Massachusetts school district's condom - distribution program does not violate parents» religious rights or their right to control their children's upbringing, the state's highest court has ruled.

In that case, the high court ruled that the state's heavy reliance on local property taxes for funding public education violated the state constitution's guarantee of an adequate education for New Hampshire children.

He ruled that such a system violates the state constitution's guarantee that all children receive «basic equality of educational opportunity.»

The judge ruled that the tenure and other job protection laws for teachers violate the state constitution's guarantee that children receive «basic equality of educational opportunity.»

After reviewing the body of research on school finance, Denver Judge Sheila Rappaport ruled in December that Colorado's school funding system violates the state's constitutional promise of «uniform» educational opportunity for all children.

In Connecticut, the choice movement exploded after the landmark Sheff v. O'Neill ruling in 1996, in which the State Supreme Court ruled that the racial and socioeconomic segregation of Hartford's school children violated the Connecticut Constitution.

Almost three years later the ECHR ruled that the Latvian return order violated Article 8 of the European Convention because the Court disregarded the psychologist's report and did not sufficiently consider «what would happen as regards the child's material well - being if returned to Australia.»

Japan remains the only Group of 7 nation to abstain from signing the Hague Convention on international child abduction, rendering the U.S. powerless to extradite Japanese citizens charged with violating U.S. courts» custody rulings.

Parents should make sure to learn these rules, therefore, and teach them to their children to avoid a finding of contributory negligence on the part of a child bicyclist as a result of violating a rule of the road or other traffic law.

The court ruled that the ban on gay adoption violated the Florida Constitution's guarantee of equal protection because it irrationally singled out for differential treatment gay parents and their would - be adoptive children.

«YouTube Kids clearly violates the existing FCC regulations for children's television by obliterating the rules designed to place clear boundaries between programming and advertising,» Josh Golin, associate director of Campaign for a Commercial - Free Childhood, told the E-Commerce Times.

Conduct disorder is a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior by a child or teenager in which the basic rights of others or major age - appropriate societal norms or rules are violated.

CD, the most common problem referred to child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS), 6 is defined by ICD - 10 and DSM - IV criteria as a persistent pattern of behaviour in which the basic rights of others, or major societal rules, are violated.

If the other parent violates child visitation rules, leaves the state or country with your children, or keeps you from seeing your children, he or she may well be breaking the law.

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV), conduct disorder is present when a child or adolescent (1) repetitively violates the rights of others or violates age - appropriate social norms and rules, and (2) this pattern of behavior causes significant impairment in social, academic, or occupational functioning.

In the case Coull v. Rottman, a family court ruled it would violate public policy to allow the paying parent to take a credit against future child support payments in order to recoup the overpayments.

Children exhibiting elevated levels of disruptive behaviors [oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conduct disorder (CD)-RSB- and / or the problems from the broadband externalizing spectrum often follow a life - course trajectory of conduct problems (i.e., repetitive and persistent patterns of behavior that violate the rights of the others and major age - appropriate societal norms or rules, respectively) that place them at greater risk of later antisocial behavior during adolescence (Odgers et al., 2008; Hyde et al., 2013).

The child will most likely begin to violate more serious rules like running away from home or skipping school.

Conduct Disorder is when a child is physically cruel; they are deceitful and may violate serious societal rules.

The problem with your particular case would be the marketability when trying to promote it as «great for your adult children» or «let your parents live in the in - law suite» - however you phrase your rental ads, this would violate Fair Housing rules that prohibit discrimination based on familial status.

In Fair Housing Congress v. Weber, the U.S. District Court found that the rules of an apartment complex discriminated against children, and thus, violated the Fair Housing Act.