Humans are forced to train
their children against nature!
Not exact matches
I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the
Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack
Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their
children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack
children, which even, preposterously, gave
children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack
children the right to take legal action
against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their
child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the
child and the
nature of the smack.»
The older teleological view measured morality
against man's rational - animal
nature; in the sexual realm, this meant evaluating sex acts by reference to the common good of marriage, which integrated spousal union and the bearing and rearing of
children.
And maybe it shouldn't be the biologically normal thing that needs to change, maybe we should focus on changing culture and take a stand
against the objectification and over emphasis on the sexual
nature of the female breasts so we can feed our
children without fear of it being confused with pedophilia.
After the murder of a
child by a stray bullet, a group of women led by Lysistrata organize
against the on - going violence in Chicago's Southside creating a movement that challenges the
nature of race, sex and violence in America and around the world.
Walkabout is a deceptively simple tale about lost
children trying to find their way home that slowly grows into a treatise
against the continued expansion of industry, the domination of humanity over unbridled
nature, and the correlation between the savageries still inherent in so - called civilized society.
Stephen Robertson, in his article «Age of Consent Laws», states: «Narrowly concerned with sexual violence, and with girls, originally, since the 19th century the age of consent has occupied a central place in debates over the
nature of childhood, adolescence, and adulthood, and been drawn into campaigns
against prostitution and
child marriage, struggles to achieve gender and sexual equality, and the response to teenage pregnancy.»
James Hansen, the director of the Nasa Goddard Institute for Space Studies who first warned the world about the dangers of climate change in the 1980s, has joined other scientists in submitting statements to be considered by a judge at the Information Rights Tribunal on Friday... James Hansen told the Guardian: «Our
children and grandchildren will judge those who have misled the public, allowing fossil fuel emissions to continue almost unfettered, as guilty of crimes
against humanity and
nature... If successful, the FOI request may, by exposing one link in a devious manipulation of public opinion, start a process that allows the public to be aware of what is happening, what is at stake, and where the public interest lies.»»
[¶](b) Any history of abuse by one parent
against the
child or
against the other parent... [¶](c) The
nature and amount of contact with both parents.»
This resource provides information on the interlocking
nature of crimes
against children and discusses rates of polyvictimization.
Furthermore, in the aftermath of the MABO decision, it is significant that by the very
nature of the action taken
against them,
children removed from their families have been effectively denied their opportunity to access native title rights.
Four housing groups, including the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA), filed a lawsuit last week
against the social media giant, alleging Facebook's advertising platform is discriminatory in
nature for allowing the exclusion of families with
children, women and other protected classes.