Not exact matches
The purposes of this relationship are (1) the mutual loving support of husband and wife and (2) their loving service of life by
bringing children into the
world and raising them to be virtuous and productive.
We never talked about where she was going, instead we talked about the three
children we
brought into the
world and how wonderful they are.
Ultimately, we have no control over
children being
brought into this
world.
Really it's unplanned parenthood with no teaching of values that marriage should come before a
child and the ability to provide
children with stability before
bringing a
child into this
world.
I pitty any
child brought into the
world the way it is today.
«The most important moral and legal rule concerning the physiological side of kinship,» he wrote in Sex, Culture, and Myth, «is that no
child should be
brought into the
world without a man — and one man at that — assuming the role of sociological father, that is, guardian and protector, the male link between the
child and the rest of the community.»
On the one extreme there are poor single parents who work too much to have time for their
children, and on the other the affluent parents who are too self «absorbed to take an interest in the life they
brought into the
world.
People should have
children when they are healthy, stable, financially secure, and WANT to
bring a baby
into the
world.
But
children are not intended by God to be
brought into the
world outside the marriage bond, nor is single parenthood endorsed in scripture as a providential way of rearing
children.
Regardless, the cruelest thing in this
world is to
bring an unwanted, unloved
child into a
world that has many pitfalls.
On his own, he said, he would have been captive to typically modern questions about whether it is «meaningful» to
bring children into the
world; for him, the answer would have been no.
Yet the
bringing of
children into the
world asks more of the woman than of the man.
And he should never have lived in a way that risked
bringing children into the
world (i.e., conceived), that he was implicitly resolved to either abandon or abort, in the first place.
Everyone should be for birth control, for s e x education and for a mothers right to choose not to
bring another
child into the
world with little to no ability to care for that
child.
If it could be shown that research
into human cloning would contribute to the well - being of the
children and adults who already (or may someday) suffer from tragic genetic disorders (such as Down's syndrome or Huntington's disease) and that human cloning itself would benefit the
children who are
brought into the
world through cloning.
At that point, before a new life has truly formed, if the mother KNOWS that
bringing a
child into the
world in her current situation will do more harm than good, why should she not have the choice?
Anyone of good conscience should agree with what I have said and ban together, so we can
bring this country the very
world we live on
into the 21st century free of these groups hold on our minds and revel in all the promise this century has to offer so our
children's
children's
children will look back in pride an see we did what we did for them and there posterity.
Whereas BAIPA protects the right to life of the
child who survives an abortion, the Pennsylvania act protects the
child who could survive an abortion, making it criminal in most cases to abort the
child and, where an abortion is permissible within narrow limits, requiring doctors to treat the
child as a second patient who should be
brought into the
world alive and unharmed if possible.
You're put away for life yet you're allowed to
bring children into the
world that you have no way of supporting.
Many of these same people
bring children into the
world at a high pace, and then would prefer that the rest of society take over and educate their
children in their particular brand of religion when they don't plan well and don't want to violate their beliefs.
The feral
child brought up by the wolves has a human body and originally a human brain, but it is not human: it does not have that distance from the
world and other selves which is a necessary presupposition for its entering
into relation with a Thou and becoming an I.
And perhaps if more couples did see marriage worthwhile in and of itself, not merely as a means of
bringing a family (
children)
into the
world, we would see stronger marriages.
Aware that this line leaves out of account the potential of the
child for a full human life, Singer responds that «in a
world that is already over-populated, and in which the regulation of fertility is universally accepted, the argument that we should
bring all potential people
into existence is not persuasive.»
The future of the Catholic faith belongs to those committed to
bringing new life
into the
world and raising their
children in truth.
A Member of Parliament — or a magistrate, or the Head Teacher of a school, or a borough councillor - who dared to say «
Children should be taught that marriage is the lifelong union of a man and a woman, bringing new children into the world» would in all probability be denounced with vigour and forced to
Children should be taught that marriage is the lifelong union of a man and a woman,
bringing new
children into the world» would in all probability be denounced with vigour and forced to
children into the
world» would in all probability be denounced with vigour and forced to resign.
The kids born to these alcoholics do not choose to be
brought into this
world or raised by them, it is not fair to those
children.
Perhaps the outcry at Dawkins» tweets has more to do with his assertion that, given the choice, it is «immoral» to
bring a disabled
child into the
world.
I mean, you just never know when an errant ejaculation out the window of a multistory building might be God trying to
bring more unwanted
children into the
world.
Part of the distinctively human expression of pervasive sexuality is the
bringing of
children into the
world, at least for those who are not celibate (where such contact does not occur) or homosexual (where procreation is not possible).
Back, then, to Joseph the dreamer and the
child he and Mary
bring into this
world.
When nine out often women choose not to
bring a disabled
child into the
world it is both a sign and a reinforcement of the culture's inhospitality toward those who live a conspicuously dependent life.
was very sweet and thoughtful, as well as incredibly hopeful about
bringing a
child into the
world with disabilities.
When we start fighting for the rights of those that ARE born and are alive by anyone's definition of the word and I believe the
world we are
bringing children into allows them the best future and chance for survival, then I may revisit my position.
Many of these same people
bring children into the
world at a high pace, and then would prefer that the rest of society take over and educate their
children in their particular brand of religion when they don't plan well.
Meanwhile, China reaches deep
into the family lives of its citizens: Its «family planning» policies, including forced abortions, have
brought about the
world's highest number of deaths of unborn
children.
I'll merely suggest the obvious: The future of the Catholic faith belongs to those who create it with their fidelity, their self - sacrifice, their commitment to
bringing new life
into the
world and raising their
children in truth, and their determination to walk Christ's «narrow way» with joy.
A nice lady here in some kind of relationship is wanting to
bring a loved
child into the
world.
While gay and lesbian couples may not breed as fast as their straight counterparts, they still work together and
bring children and families
into the
world just fine.
Abortion can end when the Church comes to the aid of those mothers - to - be are in trouble and families are scared to
bring a
child into the
world — not working against them.
Isn't that the meaning of the anguished and painful cry out of Mary's «insides» that
brings the
child into the
world?
IVF allows many couples to
bring new life
into the
world and to experience the great gift of
children.
If good parents are not evil for deliberately
bringing children into this
world and inevitably having to discipline them in some fashion or another then neither is God (who is better than any earthly parent could ever be) for creating man.
In other words that, as co-creators with God, they
bring children into the
world and rear them in the setting of family love, so as to prepare them for a life that can lead to Heaven.
Will they be taught the best Catholic arguments explaining why marriage is essentially a place to
bring children into the
world and provide a safe nurturing environment?
There was no point in
bringing children into the
world that was about to pass away.
In itself, taking advantage of new reproductive technologies will neither enhance nor diminish a parent's motive for
bringing a new
child into the
world.
And there was something strangely naïve about the reply of the lady from Germany who with obvious and hearty sincerity declared that girls should be
brought up to think of
bringing children into the
world with joyous anticipation and to trust the good Lord for the future of the
children when they had come.
In one sense the birth of every
child is a miraculous event: a new and unique person
brought into the
world — man and woman participating in God's creative work.
«What Babies Want — An Exploration of the Consciousness of Infants,» a film by Debby Takikawa and narrated by Noah Wyle (of ER fame), is an amazing and eye - opening movie that explores the «profoundly important and sacred opportunity we have in
bringing children into the
world.»
Now, that isn't to say that women who can't conceive
children are powerless, but simply that the capacity to
bring brand new life
into the
world is a power unmatched by any other human function.