Sentences with phrase «children do things for»

As a parent, when your children do things for the Continue Reading...

If you don't have the time to let your child do things for herself, then you should start your routine a little earlier to accommodate the extra time she'll need.»

Let your child do things for himself, like feeding himself, exploring new play environments and entertaining himself with toys.

Not exact matches

The hard thing for some people is researching stuff they're not into — like visiting the children's museum if you don't have kids — but I love uncovering new gems.

Also, purposefully do things that take you away from your work, such as meeting friends for coffee or playing with your child in the park.

«People will do a lot of things for their children.

If you're a parent (like me), you've noticed children don't take things for granted.

Becoming the «poster child» for any issue when your company is under pressure to perform is the last thing any CEO should do, experts say.

«I do fundraisers for various places and one of the things that always sells is you know, put your child or yourself in an infomercial,» says Harrington.

For the record, a quick list of things that need to be done: Sell or rent your current house, find your new home, squat in temporary accommodation in between, pack and move, close out old utilities, set - up new utilities, update your health insurance and driver's license, ditto with banking and vehicle registration, deliver said vehicle to new location, ensure spouse and children have jobs and school / daycare placements, find childcare in between if necessary, settle everyone in.

As parents, you think the best thing you can do for your children is to encourage them to go to college and get a good education — and, hopefully, that will help them land good jobs with higher earning power than if they had high school diplomas alone.

It takes only one thing: Does the public have the courage to realize that we must go through some painful processes for the benefit of our children and our children's children?

Starting early is probably the single best thing a parent can do for a child when building up a dividend income portfolio.

A few of the many things that jump off of the pages for me are that it doesn't seem to support working families with kids (it REPEALS the up to $ 5,000 exclusion from gross income for dependent care assistance that many working parents use to subsidize the skyrocketing costs of child care while they work) or even those who (like my fantastic law students at UNLV) are pursuing and paying for higher education.

An education is a useful thing... Christmas has nothing to do with your imaginary friends illegitimate child... read on and open your closed mind: (http://www.livescience.com/25779-christmas-traditions-history-paganism.html)» Early Christians had a soft spot for pagans

Two things bother me, why jeopardize your children's security for this experiment, and why do it??? I mean everyone has doubts I their faith, but being a Christian raised by atheists, turning your back so publicly is the same as saying your faith was a joke... it is insulting to believers, a crisis of faith is normal in life, denouncing faith is shameful

That explain alot happening in Alaska... all these cops are «retiring» aka I didn't get caught helping Todd Palin's Pimping Service... And that explains why the FBI changed Special Agent in Charge... and they sent a Girl not a Guy... ouch... if they are doing these things then it sounds to me like some peoples need to file charges... that crap has to stop... period... but now we will sell our soul for money or in Sarah Palin's case her body and those of her children evidently and Pappa Pimpin Palin there to collect the $ $ $

I will give credence to all of these if you can answer just one thing for me — how do you rationally explain your love for your wife and children?

I fear for all my fellowman, including some of my children and siblings and wish they would just do the simple thing — read the Book of Mormon with real intent, wanting to know if it is true or not.

One of the more surprising things I discovered (or maybe it's not so surprising) is that while many of the churches did a good job talking about their services times, children's programs, and upcoming events, few wrote much about opportunities for -LSB-...]

I don't know what God thinks, but to me if gay marriage is about family life and the possibility of raising children (in other words a desire on the part of gays to be accepted into married life as it exists) then I think it is a good thing for the same reasons that I think hetero families are good and necessary.

I'm confused it says they will be gossips conceited unholy haters of good without love self love people in the end times to stay away not even to receive them not even pray for them is that blasphemy then it says they hold firm to a godliness but deny its power but I thought blasphemy they don't hold firm to any godliness but are not drawn by the spirit at all to wan na ask forgiveness even it says god is just and will forgive why I wish he would forgive all things his children suffer over that can't change need to also it says if u can say Jesus is lord the holy spirit is with u right or u couldn't even say those words please someone help I've been suffering

Does a parent only provide good things for their children if they specifically ask?

It's a combination of a few things that are real: the baby won't sleep, I have four children and there aren't enough hours in the day for everything to get done, I have obligations...

But even the depraved love their wives and children and do nice things for their friends.

Acts 17:24 - 28 «24 The God who made the world and all things in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands; 25 nor is He served by human hands, as though He needed anything, since He Himself gives to all people life and breath and all things; 26 and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation, 27 that they would seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; 28 for in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, «For we also are His children.»&raqfor Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; 28 for in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, «For we also are His children.»&raqfor in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, «For we also are His children.»&raqFor we also are His children.»»

Why don't they lock up the priests who did these ungodly things to children, and hold the diocese responsible as well for turning their face, like the Sandusky mess!!

That doesn't really seem fair, but... what about this: If children must die by disease and starvation, that is one thing, but surely it isn't God's will for little children to be brutally tortured, raped, and murdered.

I want to be a voice for these women and children and do whatever I can, even it's a bunch of small things, to help end this miserable thing.

(CNN)-- As he waited with parents who feared that their kids were among the 20 children killed at a Connecticut elementary school on Friday, Rabbi Shaul Praver said the main thing he could do for parents was to merely be present.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackChildren Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

For example, if the suicidal person believes that he is doing what is best for his children, it should be pointed out forcefully that leaving them with the psychological burden of his suicide is the worst thing he could do for thFor example, if the suicidal person believes that he is doing what is best for his children, it should be pointed out forcefully that leaving them with the psychological burden of his suicide is the worst thing he could do for thfor his children, it should be pointed out forcefully that leaving them with the psychological burden of his suicide is the worst thing he could do for thfor them.

I home schooled my last two children and it's the best thing I could have done for them.

Teaching their child to do the right thing (18 per cent), illustrating the value of hard work (eleven per cent), providing for everything they need (eleven per cent) and being a positive role model (seven per cent) completed the top five.

Inbreeding will eventual create problems to the moral thing to do when have children is too look for a mate that will make your children stronger and smarter.

Surely, you don't want the kid being sexually abused to think that it is a good thing!?!? Maybe I'm wrong about this, but I think that the child who hears that it is a bad thing that he should not endure will go looking for help to escape.

For one thing, drug addicts have probably found all the lake isles already and littered them with used needles, as they've done to the parks, and they may still be there, along with the child molesters.

In the act of admonishing even he will say (for it is no rare speaker that is here introduced to talk, and just on that account the praise of the Good is so much the more glorious because it does not require the approval of eloquence, for here it is well to note that it is one of life's most tragically spoiled children who speaks admonishingly to a youth) even he will say, «Do not be afraid, be slow to judge others, but attend closely to yourself, hold firmly to willing one thing, to willing the Good in truth, and thus, from now on, let this lead you wherever for now it will lead you — because eternally it will lead you to victory.

BTW IM glad yuo did nt do those things to your kids... God did nt tell the Israelites to do this to children (as in youngsters) MOst of what you posted were for grown kids..

Atheism is not healthy for children and other living things is an idiot who does not know their bible.

They have slandered me and berated me for all these years all because I wrote to my mother and father about what was done to me many years ago growing up as a child, and I wrote that I would take steps to protect any innocent victims if the same thing happened to them.

Nobody who really understands the message and ministry of Jesus, and especially His love for children, can imagine that Jesus wanted or commanded these mothers to do such horrific things to their babies.

This dilemma, it seems to me, calls for reflection upon all those old fairy tales in which the bolder of three unrestricted wishes manages nevertheless to screw things up: reading those stories as children, with considerable incredulity, we thought that in the same situation we would surely do better.

You are doing the exact same thing that Satan did and was kicked out of Heaven for, Taking God's Job in deciding who is his child and who is not.

Since he can't appear in Playboy, he does the next thing, claims that Creationism is bad for children.

If you have friends over to your house for dinner, and you pull out some family videos about your children, are you going to show clips of all the times they misbehaved, threw fits, wrecked the car, got in fights, failed classes, came home drunk, and every other bad thing your children did while they were growing up?

Gothard's teachings involve rules upon rules all dealing with the outward, dress, hair, smiling, bright eyes, no birth control or dating, no higher education for girls who must stay in the home until the father decides what they should do, how God blesses and is happy with you if you do such and such, so many rules, those who really wanted to please God were under the weight of things they could never accomplish... plus the male regime and women having to be careful not to defraud men by their dress or looks made it so easy for sexual predatory behaviors to take hold and the woman at fault for the man's problems and such... ARGH!!!!!!!!!!!! No wonder some of the children of this regime became athiests.

what i don't understand is why one part of the bible, this part for example is the word of god, but the other parts that tell Christians to do things like buy slaves and kill untruly children and stuff is NOT the law of god.

If He wants to allow a barren woman to be with child, that is an easy thing for Him to do.

If He wants a virgin to be with child, that is also an easy thing for Him to do.