Not exact matches
Coming, as they often
do,
from families with a history of
child and wife abuse, alcoholism, promiscuity,
poor nutrition, a lack of discipline and low academic achievement, they find adjustment to stricter, often fundamentalist standards difficult.
And these days, unless
children from poor families get a college degree, their economic mobility is severely restricted: Young people who grow up in
families in the lowest income quintile (with household income below about $ 21,500) and don't obtain a B.A. now have just a one in two chance of escaping that bottom economic bracket as adults.
Some barriers include the negative attitudes of women and their partners and
family members, as well as health care professionals, toward breastfeeding, whereas the main reasons that women
do not start or give up breastfeeding are reported to be
poor family and social support, perceived milk insufficiency, breast problems, maternal or infant illness, and return to outside employment.2 Several strategies have been used to promote breastfeeding, such as setting standards for maternity services3, 4 (eg, the joint World Health Organization — United Nations
Children's Fund [WHO - UNICEF] Baby Friendly Initiative), public education through media campaigns, and health professionals and peer - led initiatives to support individual mothers.5 — 9 Support
from the infant's father through active participation in the breastfeeding decision, together with a positive attitude and knowledge about the benefits of breastfeeding, has been shown to have a strong influence on the initiation and duration of breastfeeding in observational studies, 2,10 but scientific evidence is not available as to whether training fathers to manage the most common lactation difficulties can enhance breastfeeding rates.
Federal assistance is designed to help
poor families with nearly every essential need
from housing to health care, but diapers — a product fundamental to
child health that no baby can
do without — aren't included.
Cahill says he wants to
do more to protect
children at Charter Schools, who often come
from the
poorest families in the state, and says he sees it as «the civil rights issue of our time».
It
does this by simply preventing
poor people
from moving to the UK to live as a
family, regardless of how long they've been married and, irrationally, making it even more difficult if they have
children.
At 149 schools in the Bronx, less than one in ten can read or
do math at grade level, and these schools disproportionately impact
poor children of - color — 96 % of the 65,000 students in these failing schools are of - color, and 95 % come
from families near or below the poverty line.
That
children enrolled are usually coming
from very
poor families and therefore
do not have enough money for a minimum of existence such as food, medicines, etc. (not to mention buying of textbooks, and other school material).
• Duke researchers Charles Clotfelter, Helen Ladd, and Jacob Vigdor found that being taught by a sub for 10 days per year has a larger effect on a
child's math scores than if he'd changed schools, and about half the size of the difference between students
from well - to -
do and
poor families.
Quality Preschool Benefits
Poor and Affluent Kids, Study Finds NBC News, March 28, 2013 «While most previous studies had focused only on kids
from underprivileged backgrounds, in the new study Harvard researchers found that regardless of
family income
children who got a year of quality prekindergarten
did better in reading and math than kids who spent the year in daycare, with relatives, or in some other kind of preschool, according to the report which was published in
Child Development.»
«Some of the students
from poorer families say that with limited resources, they are glad they didn't have a sibling and now they don't want their
child to go without.
(HealthDay)-- U.S.
children entering kindergarten
do worse on tests when they're
from poorer families with lower expectations and less focus on reading, computer use and preschool attendance, new research suggests.
If anything,
children from poor families generally need extra assistance to
do as well as students
from more affluent
families.
When you are being abused or hearing about
children and parents being abused and harassed for opting out of the unfair and discriminatory Common Core SBAC test or when you are paying more in taxes and watching important school programs and services cut, now that thanks to our elected and appointed officials we are pissing away $ 100,000,000.00 a year forcing
children to take a test that will tell us that students
from rich
families tend to
do better and student
from poor families tend to
do worse on standardized tests.
... four in ten bright
children from poorer families would go to a top university — today only one in ten
do.
He found in this piece of research that
children from prosperous
families in Kent (the biggest area for selective schools in England) are more likely to get into grammar schools and also that in selective areas,
poorer children overall get relatively worse GCSE results than they
do in comprehensive areas.
While Coates doesn't touch on education policy, he essentially makes a strong historical case for why reformers (especially increasingly erstwhile conservatives in the movement) must go back to embracing accountability measures and a strong federal role in education policymaking that, along with other changes in American society, are key to helping
children from poor and minority households (as well as their
families and communities) attain economic and social equality.
It may be contentious to state that many American
children, whether they come
from poor, middle - income, or wealthy
families,
do not have adequate access to high - quality educational opportunities and, as a result, fall short of achieving their academic potential while in school.
American
children from high - income
families do very well on international tests, but our
children of poverty
do much worse, and nearly 75 % of LAUSD students are
poor enough to qualify for free lunches.
No
Child Left Behind required states to «disaggregate» assessment results to illuminate how disadvantaged or vulnerable populations — like black and Hispanic students and
children from poor families — were
doing.
Making the case that choice allows for all
families,
poor or middle class, to meet the particular needs of their
children can win support, especially
from white middle class
families who realize that how they are hurt by school zones and other Zip Code Education policies (and are also condescended by teachers and school leaders when they want more for their kids), but don't see any other way to avoid those problems beyond paying for private schools out their own pockets.
Ofsted's chief inspector had warned that
children from poorer families who live in the countryside or on the coast in England,
do worse at school than those who live in cities.
What the Left has
done pretty well is boost marijuana sales, create the vaping industry and help rob the bread
from the mouths of
children in
poor families with smoking parents.
However, living in a geographically remote part of Scotland (more than 30 minutes» driving time
from urban settlements of 10,000 people or more),
did appear to increase the risk of a
poor father -
child relationship, irrespective of whether the
family was living in a remote town or rural area.