Sentences with phrase «children of this marriage»

Do you believe that God is married and we were once all spirit children of that marriage before coming to this existence?

If his second marriage were invalid, the children of that marriage would be illegitimate; the claim of illegitimacy would challenge their right to the throne and threaten civil war over the succession.

loving attention, the attention of psychological priority, of care for and physically love for the children of the marriage.

Upon divorce, a court in Alaska will grant custody of the children of the marriage to either parent, considering the following factors:

This abuse is more often than not inflicted by husbands upon their wives and the children of the marriage.

Factors such as the length of your marriage, whether or not there are children of the marriage, whether your spouse supported you in ways that allowed you to work on your business would all be factors that a judge would consider.

There were children of the marriage.

If there are children of the marriage, one person may live with the children, and the other person will give that person money to help the children live their lives.

In a 1999 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (Chartier v. Chartier), the Court examined the meaning of the term «child of the marriage» and concluded that:

Where there are no outstanding financial issues and no children of the marriage under 16, it's possible to be divorced on the basis of Simplified Procedure, either after one year (with the consent of your spouse) or after two years» living apart.

If there are children of the marriage, child support must be paid in accordance with the Federal Child Support Guidelines unless there are special provisions in an order or agreement that benefits the child (ren).

Mr. Hartshorne took the position that «the trial judge did not have jurisdiction to entertain the respondent's application for retroactive and prospective support for the eldest child because the son was no longer a child of the marriage when the application was made in November 2007.»

According to Texas Family Code 7.001, «the court shall order a division of the estate of the parties in a manner that the court deems just and right, having due regard for the rights of each party and any children of the marriage.»

The primary issues are whether the plaintiff should have sole custody and guardianship of the two children of the marriage, and the formulation of an access regime having reasonable balance and certainty, and being in the best interests of the children.

In Barder, the wife killed herself and the two children of the marriage five weeks after the conclusion of a consent order.

First, the welfare of any child of the marriage should be considered.

In divorce proceedings, it is generally the norm for one party to ask for spousal support and child support from the other, based on a legally acknowledged desire to redress certain financial inequalities that one party bears disproportionately due to the fact of the parties» marriage to each other, and to make adequate provision for the children of the marriage.

Things get even more complicated when it comes to provisions for the children of each marriage.

If a husband dies without a will or trust in place, the spouse will only end up with part of the husband's estate, depending whether there are children of this marriage, children of prior marriage, no children, and parents living.

The eldest child was no longer a child of the marriage and one of the two remaining children now lived with the father.

We then had to consider the issue of issue, ie the children of the marriage.

Alabama law provides: «Upon granting a divorce, the court may give the custody and education of the children of the marriage to either father or mother, as may seem right and proper.»

For the purposes of the federal Child Support Guidelines, «child» simply means a «child of the marriage», and that term is further defined by the Divorce Act to mean a child who may be unable to withdraw from parental control because of an «other cause».

Sadly, the complainant wife and F.L. were going through a very stressful time in their lives given the health of the child of the marriage.

Additionally, in making a custody order under s. 16 (1), the court shall give effect to the principle that a child of the marriage should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the child and, for that purpose, shall take into consideration the willingness of the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate such contact (s. 16 (10)-RRB-.

When read together, these provisions dictate that an adult well over the age of majority can still qualify as being a «child of the marriage» and in theory be entitled to receive support.

Joseph Neuberger alleged in the defence that the complainant had fabricated the allegations in order to obtain sole custody of the one child of the marriage.

There are also two general rules that apply to such scenarios: 1) retroactive child support extends back three years from the date the paying spouse is given notice (for example by the fact that an application for an adjustment to support is launched with the court), unless there has been blameworthy conduct; and 2) the child must be a «child of the marriage» — and therefore eligible to receive support — at the time the application is made.

At last there is an end to the despair and hopelessness of trying to co-parent children of the marriage with someone with whom you largely disagree with.

(c) any economic burden of caring, after divorce, for a child of the marriage under the age of 16 years should be shared fairly between the parties;

The court will then look to see if the contract conforms to the objectives of the Divorce Act, which are: the finality and certainty of the parties going forward, the recognition of the advantages and disadvantages of the parties arising from the marriage or its breakdown, the apportionment between the spouses of the financial consequences arising from care of children of the marriage, the relief of any economic hardship arising from the marriage breakdown, and the promotion of the self - sufficiency of the former spouses.

Here, it was clear that by imposing the «child of the marriage» criterion at the outset, one of the daughters no long qualified for support at the time the mother's application was brought.

A-6130-02T2 (New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, August 31, 2005): Ex-husband, after being told by ex-wife that he was not the father of the child of the marriage when the child was 30 years old, sued the alleged biological father, seeking a declaration of paternity and reimbursement for child support pursuant to the Parentage Act.

Similar to a prenuptial agreement, this agreement contains provision for support, property distribution and any children of the marriage in the event the marriage terminates.

Parents who have joint custody of their children must both sign a passport application for a child of the marriage.

If you have children you must also have a Parenting Plan that makes adequate and sufficient provisions in writing for the custody and support of the minor children of the marriage.

The federal government web site provides a pdf guide with information about when a child should be included as a child of the marriage.

In Paul, the plaintiff applied under s 77 of British Columbia's Family Relations Act for an exclusive possession order for herself and the three children of the marriage (para 13).

Considering the duration of 9.5 to 19 years suggested by the Guidelines, it is likely Mrs. Ashak's entitlement will continue past the time the children are no longer children of the marriage.

Given the uncertainty of this date, the order will provide for a review of the quantum and continuing duration of spousal support, if any, when the children are no longer children of the marriage.

Definition — «child of the marriage» --(s. 2 (1)-RRB- child of two spouses (former spouses), even if one parent is not the biological parent (but stands in loco parentis) who at the time is:

We regularly help parents deal with issues regarding where children of a marriage will live after divorce and what kind of access the non-custodial parent is entitled to receive.

If there are children of the marriage, the duration of the marriage has no bearing on the amount of child support that is payable to either parent.

First and foremost, spouses must do their best to prevent inflicting emotional trauma on any children of the marriage.

He or she can refuse to approve parts or all of the agreement if it's determined that it isn't fair and equitable and in the best interests of any children of the marriage.

Entitlement to child support is automatic if the child is determined to be a child of the marriage.

16 (10) and 17 (9) of the [Divorce] Act require that «the court shall give effect to the principle that a child of the marriage should have as much contact with each former spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the child».

apportion between the spouses any financial consequences arising from the care of any child of the marriage over and above any obligation for the support of any child of the marriage;

109 By contrast, the objectives of a spousal support are to: (a) recognize any economic advantages or disadvantages arising from the marriage or its breakdown; (b) apportion any financial consequences arising from the care of any child of the marriage over and above the obligation for support of any child of the marriage; (c) relieve any economic hardship of the spouses arising from the breakdown of the marriage; and (d) promote, as far as practicable, the economic self - sufficiency of each spouse within a reasonable period of time.

The husband apparently learned about the extension of the BC order when he went to an Edmonton daycare «where he believed the child of the marriage was» (at para 6).