It clearly sets out that the gap between
children on free school meals and all other children is actually wider in wholly - selective areas than in nonselective.
Mr Laws told delegates it was «quite literally intolerable» that in some schools and certain areas of the country almost eight in 10
children on free school meals - a key measure of poverty - failed to get five good GCSEs, including maths and English.
Their research found that, in 2002, 22 per cent of
children on free school meals in London gained five or more A * - C GCSEs, including English and Maths.
Now graduates who do most of their training in a school with many
children on free school meals will receive up to 25 % extra in bursary payments, up to # 5,000.
We know that the education gap between
children on free school meals who go to grammars and their better - off counterparts is closed during the course of their education.
The research also failed to find a «significant positive impact» on social mobility, and in fact found that the gap between the proportion of
children on free school meals attaining five A * to C GCSEs including English and maths and all other children was actually wider in selective areas (34.1 per cent) than in non-selective areas (27.8 per cent).
Latest figures show a 31 % gap in GCSE performance between
children on free school meals and their peers, although this gap has narrowed slightly.
Results of national tests known as Sats taken by 10 and 11 - year - olds in England show that
children on free school meals do less well than their classmates, and the pattern continues to GCSE level.
«We'll be looking very carefully at what's happening in those local authorities with the same sort of population, with similar levels of deprivation, similar numbers of
children on free school meals, where one particular local authority does extremely well and another one doesn't.
She said: «We need to look at, for example, should
children on free school meals be able to enter grammar schools if they have lower than the average [test score] that is required in Kent?
For the first time, it will include a specific measure of how well
children on free school meals are doing.
The «pupil premium plus» money, which schools get to help previously looked - after children, ought to be «ring - fenced» so it's not lumped in with pupil premium money for
children on free school meals, she said.
And it says that academies take a higher proportion of
children on free school meals than the national average.
Funds for SEND pupils also ought to be ring - fenced and monitored, as with the pupil premium for
children on free school meals, he said.
But in secondary schools, the attainment gap between
children on free school meals (FSM) and their better - off peers has refused to budge in a decade.
A Department for Education spokeswoman said that grammar schools have a «track record of closing the attainment gap to almost zero between
children on free school meals and their better off classmates».
«Pupils typically travel three times as far to attend selective schools, so we will extend free school transport to include
all children on free school meals who attend a selective school.
Ms Powell, a former shadow education secretary, said: «Grammar schools in London have a shameful record of giving opportunities to
children on free school meals.
New research by the Social Mobility Commission has uncovered a progression gap between choices made by
children on free school meals and their more affluent peers which can not be explained by their results at school or where they live.
However, research by the National Union of Teachers (NUT) and the charity Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) shows that primary schools with more than 40 per cent of
children on free school meals will on average lose # 473 per pupil.
He also referenced the fact that the attainment gap at GCSE level in Hackney between
children on free school meals and those who are not is 14.6 per cent, compared to a 34 per cent gap in Kent, which operates a selective system.
Children on free school meals achieve almost half a GCSE grade less in Attainment 8 core subjects than more affluent pupils, according to the report, and 88 per cent of this gap is believed to be due to differences between pupils at the same school.
He goes on and on about the pupil premium, when schools always did get extra money for
children on free school meals.
But, interestingly, delegates voted to take out a line saying they welcomed «the new powers for academies to prioritise admissions to
children on free school meals».
The party has also pledged to increase the Early Years Pupil Premium to reach # 1000 per
child on free school meals.
The interviews given by leading Lib Dem MPs over the weekend suggest that their narrative at the next election will go something like this: «We have protected the poorest and most deserving by raising the personal tax allowance, providing the biggest ever increase in the state pension, and giving schools a «pupil premium» - more money for
every child on free school meals.
Milburn, a former Labour cabinet minister, also criticised the failure of some local authorities — Portsmouth and Bracknell Forest — to send a single
child on free school meals to top universities.
The government's pupil premium scheme, which gives more money to schools for
each child on free school meals, should also be more focused on aiding white working class children, he added.
Therefore, with the same level of attainment,
a child on free school meals does better in a grammar school than they would if they went to a non-grammar school.
Not exact matches
Start focusing
on what you can eat with this informative guide packed with step - by - step advice to help you keep living your life the way you're used to, including tips
on how to stock your kitchen and pack
school lunches, as well as advice for hosting parties, preparing
meals, modifying recipes, planning for gluten -
free travel, and making sure your
child eats safely wherever they go.
children eligible for
free & reduced - price
meals participated in
school breakfast
on an average
school day
One year
on from the launch of
free school meals for all infants in England, 95 % of parents of the
children taking up the offer are recognising the benefits for their
child.
The
School Nutrition Association (SNA), in partnership with the United States Department of Agriculture's Food and Nutrition Service
Child Nutrition Programs will host a
FREE webinar
on nutrition standards for all foods sold in
schools outside of a reimbursable meal, known as the «Smart Snacks in Schools» sta
schools outside of a reimbursable
meal, known as the «Smart Snacks in
Schools» sta
Schools» standards.
CEO allows
schools to serve
free breakfast and
free lunch to all students when 40 percent or more of students are certified for
free meals without a paper application, which includes students who are directly certified (through data matching) for
free meals because they live in households that participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), or the Food Distribution Program
on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), as well as
children who are automatically eligible for
free school meals because of their status in foster care or Head Start, homeless, or migrant.
School districts long struggled with the issue of feeding
children whose parents couldn't or wouldn't pay, and Diane Pratt - Heavener, spokesperson for the
School Nutrition Association, recently asserted
on Take Part that the improved
meal standards mandated by the Healthy, Hunger -
Free Kids Act have only worsened the problem.
Even before I started The Lunch Tray, I'd read in Janet Poppendieck's
Free for All: Fixing
School Food in America references to data showing that, on average, children who regularly eat the federally subsidized school meal consume a wider variety of nutrients than those who consistently eat a home - packed
School Food in America references to data showing that,
on average,
children who regularly eat the federally subsidized
school meal consume a wider variety of nutrients than those who consistently eat a home - packed
school meal consume a wider variety of nutrients than those who consistently eat a home - packed lunch.
But a lesser - noticed story published that same day
on the Times
School Book blog reported that New York City is being forced to cut its Universal Meals Program, which had previously insured that all children at some predominantly low - income schools received free lunches, without demonstrating economic need — and therefore without risking social stigma by taking the school
School Book blog reported that New York City is being forced to cut its Universal
Meals Program, which had previously insured that all
children at some predominantly low - income
schools received
free lunches, without demonstrating economic need — and therefore without risking social stigma by taking the
schoolschool meal.
Mrs. Q said her blog represents what
school children who rely
on reduced - price or
free meals are fed every day.
This is certainly the intent of the National
School Lunch and Breakfast programs, which offer
free and reduced
meals to
children, based
on their families» income, as well as full - price
meals to any student.
Nationally,
on an average day during the 2015 — 2016
school year, 12.1 million students eligible to receive
free and reduced - price
school meals participated in
school breakfast, an increase of 3.7 percent, or nearly 433,000
children from the previous
school year.
«Up to 100,000
children to miss out
on free school meals because of government threshold, study finds» via... twitter.com/i/web/status/9...
SNA championed better nutrition for
children for 67 years and supported the 2010 Healthy Hunger -
Free Kids Act, which called
on the Agriculture Department to require
schools to provide healthier
meals in exchange for an increase in federal spending
on school lunches.
Make it a priority for your
school district that every single family must return a
free meal application, even if the family already knows that they won't qualify for government subsidized
meals; those families can write «not interested»
on the form, but their
child MUST return the form to their teacher.
Note: The House of Representatives is expected to vote this week (and possibly even today)
on the Healthy, Hunger -
Free Kids Act, the Senate bill that reauthorizes the
Child Nutrition Act and which will, if passed, increase
school food funding by 6 cents per
meal.
The report highlights two French
schools, one where the cost of a
meal is $ 5 or $ 6 per student, about twice what the U.S. federal government pays
schools for
children on free lunch, and another where the chef works with about half that amount.
The CEP was one of the less publicized gains of the Healthy, Hunger -
Free Kids Act (HHFKA), allowing
schools to provide universal
meals to an entire
school based
on «direct certification» data, such as how many
children live in households receiving food stamps (SNAP benefits), without also requiring annual paper applications submitted by parents.
This funding can come in the form of a state reimbursement for
free and reduced price
meals paid
on top of the Federal reimbursement; for example, the state of California is supposed to give
schools an extra.219 for every
meal served to a qualifying low income
child (in fact, due to the ongoing budget crisis in California, that reimbursement has not always been paid for every qualifying
meal in recent years.)
Identified students include those who qualify for
free meals because they live in households that participate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), or Food Distribution Program
on Indian Reservations (FDPIR), as well as
children who are certified for
free school meals without submitting a
school meal application because of their status as being in foster care, enrolled in Head Start, homeless, runaway, or migrant students.
We must not forget now trainee journalist George Osborne's threat to wage further austerity
on the poorest if the UK chose to leave the EU — nor our previous governments» ideological adherence to slashing any and all public services, whether the NHS, the fire service and community policing, or even
free school meals for
children.
Schools have used pupil premium funding, available to
children from deprived backgrounds who are
on free school meals, to extend breakfast clubs.