Sentences with phrase «children questioned by»

Having a child questioned by those who are experts in the field protects both the accused and the child.

Not exact matches

You can even download a valuable free government guide, Preparing Your Child for College: A Resource Book for Parents, or visit a question - and - answer site staffed by 60 volunteer financial experts.

There was one thing that was never in question, though, that by the end of the day, thousands of children in Cincinnati would have new opportunities to play thanks to Dr. Pepper Snapple Group (DPS), Kroger, KaBOOM!

«We're asking questions about everything we buy now: I want to know that my makeup isn't full of toxins, my clothing wasn't made by children, and my food is free of pesticides,» says Melissa Mock, a 30 - year - old tech startup executive who got engaged last summer.

Which leads me to the question of WHY DO YOU FOLLOW a being known ONLY by a book called the bible in which he drowns EVERY animal and CHILD on the planet for no reason.

The interview format used by the Oliner team had over 450 items and consisted of six main parts: a) characteristics of the family household in which respondents lived in their early years, including relationships among family members; b) parental education, occupation, politics, and religiosity, as well as parental values, attitudes, and disciplinary approaches; c) respondent's childhood and adolescent years - education, religiosity, and friendship patterns, as well as self - described personality characteristics; d) the five - year period just prior to the war — marital status, occupation, work colleagues, politics, religiosity, sense of community, and psychological closeness to various groups of people; if married, similar questions were asked about the spouse; e) the immediate prewar and war years, including employment, attitudes toward Nazis, whether Jews lived in the neighborhood, and awareness of Nazi intentions toward Jews; all were asked to describe their wartime lives and activities, whom they helped, and organizations they belonged to; f) the years after the war, including the present — relations with children and personal and community — helping activities in the last year; this section included forty - two personality items comprising four psychological scales.

He deals at length with a question that is often posed by children, but that is not a childish at all: What was God doing before he made the world?

Everything to me is questioned by the tear of suffering in an innocent child.»

Later he would say that «those kinds of questions [to starve the afflicted child] can be answered best by the people who are right there on the scene, if they think clearly and act responsibly.»

Avoiding these questions by smugly announcing that we don't need schools and that parents can teach their own children at home simply won't do.

The questions are not asked by adopted children only; they have become the questions of the larger society.

Perhaps we can best perceive it, Moltmann suggests, by turning to the simple questions children are most likely to ask.

The very appetite proceeding from labor and peace of mind is gone: we eat just enough to keep us alive: our sleep is disturbed by the most frightful dreams; sometimes I start awake, as if the great hour of danger was come; at other times the howling of our dogs seems to announce the arrival of the enemy: we leap out of bed and run to arms; my poor wife with panting bosom and silent tears takes leave of me, as if we were to see each other no more; she snatches the youngest children from their beds, who, suddenly awakened, increase with their innocent questions the horror of the dreadful moment.

In answering that question, Segal refers to a book by John Rothchild and Susan Wolf; The Children of the Counterculture (Doubleday).

Furthermore, by characterizing allegations of child abuse as a sad case of «disunity» and «strife» within the church and urging his fellow Christians not to ask too many questions about the situation, Challies only perpetuates the painfully common narrative that those who raise concerns about abuse in churches are troublemakers, out to sow disunity and dissention, and that we are wise to keep this matters quiet.

Children are awakened at from sleep by nightmares, but many adults are kept awake at night by questions like, «What is my life's purpose?»

Clearly, the question of how to do right by today's children is an unsettled one.

I will let Paul respond to your question: «And not only so, but also when Rebekah had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac, 11 though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad — in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls — 12 she was told, «The older will serve the younger.»

Then there are the dangerous questions that challenge the tradition itself, like why can't women teach men, why can't I teach your children in Sunday school if I'm not straight, what's this head of the household crap, why can't we have marriage equality, why is the church so myopic, and isn't it possible that the whole human race is connected and one and that there is no separation illustrated by the ancient paradigm of heaven and hell.

After birth the brain cells in question are nourished by the food of the growing child.

His wife, Susan, 65, was also released and bailed after being questioned by police on suspicion of conspiracy to conceal the birth of a child.

They speak of church cultures that treated women's bodies as inherently problematic and seductive, that assigned a woman's worth to her sexual purity or procreative prowess, that questioned women's ability to think rationally or make decisions without the leadership of men, that blamed victims of sexual abuse for inviting the abuse or tempting the abuser, that shamed women who did not «joyfully submit» to their husband and find contentment in their roles as helpers and homemakers, and that effectively silenced victims of abuse by telling women and children that reporting the crime would reflect poorly on the church and thus damage the reputation of Christ.

Since the release, Ehrlichman's children have questioned the quote and a former colleague suggests that he was joking (though the reporter stands by their sincerity, suggesting that the late official was seeking atonement).

belief in anything without supporting evidence is a childrens game... We teach our children not to lie, judge a book by its cover, or to take anything at face value or to just believe without questioning... you know, we say stuff like check the source and don't believe everything you see / hear... should we teach seeking knowledge or to have faith in without?

Al Gore put the polar bears in his propaganda movie, and even though he, infamously, could only sputter in response to a question by journalist Phelim McAleer that involved the polar bear issue — children are still being warned to cut their carbon or the polar bears will drown.

«But we need to question whether parents are so controlled by children that they can't say no when kids see something they want on TV»

Whether we do it as part of a church ritual or not is another question — my wife and I and two of our children were all baptised as adults at separate times in the sea by friends and family, and one child only in a church ritual.

Also, if one would read Genesis - Malachi then one would know these question asked by Smithsonian, how we were created, and why evil came about, and to help, YHWH made us for His own sake unconditionally; He gave us a choice to decide with our own hearts what, or who we want to be in this world, as well as to who we'll be to HIM, whether being righteous, obedient children, or not the choice is ours we're responsible for our own righteousness in Ezekiel 14:14 - 21.

I question because I have the curiosity of a child — a child who does not want to be told to shut up and do as they're told by an overbearing, insensitive parent.

Insightful is his exploration of the (limited) common ground inhabited by both traditionalists and feminists, whose focus on women demands that it at least take seriously questions of child rearing.

Justices Stevens and Ginsburg thus used the fact that D&E abortion is horrific, yet clearly protected by Roe and Casey, not as a reason to question Roe and Casey, but instead to belittle as «irrational» or anti «Roe any attempt to prohibit the killing of a child partially delivered outside of the mother's body.

When parents seek to follow Jesus by being the church in their communities (rather than by simply attending church), one of the questions that often comes up is «What about our children?

This new family ideal takes an entire book to elaborate (with important questions still left unanswered), but can be briefly summarized as follows: it is the voluntary lifetime union of a woman and a man who parent their own children in a relationship characterized by love, justice and equal regard.

Now it is about the proper roles of men and women, same - sex unions and divorce and having children and a host of other questions once thought not to be political, and all of them somehow entangled with and ever returning to the conflict created by the Roe v. Wade discovery in the Constitution of an unlimited abortion license.

These are the cries of so many children's hearts, and by sending a shoe box to them, we can help provide some answers to these questions.

He then posed the following question: «What will it do with the signs of Ishmael, a handmaid's child cast away to make room for Isaac, the heir, the desert kingdom of Esau who had his birthright cheated away by the cunning Jacob, or the mission of Cyrus, the pagan king summoned by God to carry out his word which made it possible for Israel to go free?».

BTW most of your posts avoid answering a question by posing a question, like a 6 year old child.

Accordingly, the question needs to be reformulated, thus: What safeguard does the Marxist have which will restrain violence from escalating into the darkness of ultraviolence where the children of the revolution themselves are slaughtered by the revolution and the future brotherhood of man is pushed ever more remotely into the future?

The child should be questioned only by those investigators who are trained in interviewing children about child sexual abuse.

That is the question asked in «No Child» Law Whittled Down by White House, by Motoko Rich.

Taking one day off per week to emphasize being a good, honest person is a good thing in a child's life, even if the church in question approaches God by rolling on the ground screaming «Hoogalla ballababa!»

I know it's a harsh question, but religion is dangerous by nature and this indoctrination is nothing short of child abuse.

«While the previous decision by the FDA to ban BPA in products used by babies and small children is the step in the right direction, this new study again raises an important question: should FDA consider banning BPA for more than just this vulnerable population?

Between May 1996 and July» 97, according to court records, Minor assaulted Celeste Rowan, his ex-girlfriend; questioned whether he was indeed the father of their three children when his support of them was increased by a court; and finally ceased contact with them.

She had years of knowledge and experience on the subject, and she had needed it all, especially with Alex. Her latest problem child had been questioned more than once about a string of rapes in New York City, a brutal series of crimes where the perpetrator gained the confidence of his targets — and intimidated them — by claiming he was a middleweight contender, then employed drugs to subdue his victims and had his way.

The line in question states that one of Penn State's insurers has claimed «in 1976, a child allegedly reported to PSU's Head Coach Joseph Paterno that he (the child) was sexually molested by Sandusky.»

It is a child's question, vast and innocent as the sea's great vat, which a child once soberly explained he was going to dirty by throwing in a handful of sand.

The suggestion by John Cross in The Mirror is that the Chilean striker has become increasingly difficult to work with of late and is almost like a spoiled and sulky child at times, so the question now is where do Arsenal go from here?

With the College Football Playoff 2014 selection committy about to do its selections for the first time, the question has to be asked by man, woman, and child: what is the selection committy.

You can also support the child by asking less threatening questions that don't focus on specific schools — «Are you interested in being on the East Coast or West Coast?»