Sentences with phrase «children right into»

Jordan & Justine's Weekend Adventures ® for Wildlife Alliance brings children right into the center of animal life at a wildlife -LSB-...]

This unique, close - up look brings children right into a karate class.

As a first time mom, I was excited about tackling this task and threw my children right into my own version of potty training boot camp.

If you buy a stroller with flat recline, you can put your child right into the stroller seat with an infant insert that will give your child necessary support.

Like a harness, you slide your child right into this safety and security belt.

Not exact matches

As we watch the videos of families crying in Florida we can not comprehend how those voted into power — who hold positions where they are able to create change — continually choose unrestricted gun rights over children's lives.

«The next thing you know this has morphed thanks to the right wing media machine into an email about a secret child sex - trafficking ring.

Collectively, this disparity fuels what has been called the «school - to - prison - pipeline,» a systemic bias that civil rights advocates say pushes children and young adults of color out of the classroom and into the criminal justice system.

If I got to watch a school bus full of children roll over in front of their christian parents and burst into flames and roast I would probably jerk off right then and there.

In one of his final speeches, King admonished: «If our nation can spend $ 35 billion dollars a year to fight an unjust, evil war in Vietnam, and $ 20 billion dollars to put a man on the moon, it can spend billions of dollars to put God's children on their own two feet right here...» MLK's talking points of tapping into America's financial resources in order to help the poverty - stricken across the land were directly at odds with the economic status quo, and that is part of what got him killed.

And of course there would be those on the right, advocating for Muslim prayer in schools, not worrying about how the few Christian children might be impacted, and doing whatever they can to write bits of Sharia into the law of the land.

= > Not true, in late term pregnancy complications TODAY, the rights of the unborn child are taken into account when evaluating the solution.

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackChildren Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

- Undermining the primary rights of parents in order to coerce children and families into compliance with and servitude to the state's cultural agenda.

More recently, the question of children's own rights has come into sharper focus.

At the very least, we must ensure the civil rights of children who may someday come into the world through cloning, by insisting that no child can be owned, bought, sold, or manipulated, that no government agency or group can sponsor the cloning of a child over which it will have guardianship (i.e., children will be cloned only in circumstances where they will be reared by a family), and that no child can be cloned solely for the purpose of procuring organs or for monetary gain.

Everyone should be for birth control, for s e x education and for a mothers right to choose not to bring another child into the world with little to no ability to care for that child.

Feminism was financed by the CIA with the intention of «taxing the other half of the population» and «getting children into pre-school at a younger age so as to indoctrinate them»... there is nothing about «women's rights» involved... that is just the excuse.

Whereas BAIPA protects the right to life of the child who survives an abortion, the Pennsylvania act protects the child who could survive an abortion, making it criminal in most cases to abort the child and, where an abortion is permissible within narrow limits, requiring doctors to treat the child as a second patient who should be brought into the world alive and unharmed if possible.

One imagines behind that Scotchman's life such a home as Burns described in «The Cotter's Saturday Night,» where the profound meanings of religion and right living were bred into the very marrow of the children.

Why can't we all just mind our own business when it comes to peoples bedrooms and wedding albums, neither side get's to preach in schools, though I understand how you would think of it as the atheist getting his way by just not having you preach your God to his children in a publicly funded school, but he's not sending an atheist spokesman to influence your children, he just doesn't feel it's right to allow the religious spokesman into the schools to influence any children on his tax dollar.

The right to abortion is the foundation of Society's long struggle to guarantee that every child comes into this world wanted, loved, and cared for.

Psychosis / most psychiatric illnesses often arise in adolescence or in early adult life however 75 per cent of children with mental health disorders / issues do not get the help they need — I fell into that 75 per cent, I was misdiagnosed by a doctor and then the self - induced trance - like altered state of consciousness induced by intense / deep meditation and prayer coupled with the theology about how prayer and God work in a Christian's life (more on this below) just pushed me right over the edge.

I have a problem with people who want to use public funds and resources to promote their beliefs, who use their beliefs to stifle others» civil rights, who try to inject their beliefs into public school science classes, and who want their children to have the ability to bully others» with their beliefs.

She bustled into her house, only to emerge, minutes later, with a huge tray of cream cheese and jelly sandwiches, which she carried to our porch and offered around with her ready smile, simultaneously feeding and greeting the children of a family she had never met — and a black family at that — with nothing to gain for herself except perhaps the knowledge that she had done the right thing.

YOU ARE SO RIGHT... ISLAM IS FAR FROM A PEACEFUL RELIGION... THEY KILL THERE OWN WIFES AND CHILDREN BESIDES AMERICANS... AMERICA SHOULD NOT GIVE INTO THE DOWNTOWN MOSQUE... AMERICANS CAN NOT GO TO A MUSLIM COUNTRY AND BUILT A CHRISTIAN CHURCH OR TEMPLE... IT CAN NOT BE ONE WAY...

When we start fighting for the rights of those that ARE born and are alive by anyone's definition of the word and I believe the world we are bringing children into allows them the best future and chance for survival, then I may revisit my position.

There're only a couple of way the retarded religious right will return the USA to a 50s like society: with guns (as hinted at by Glenn Beck) and / or if they propogate like rabbits (to produce children they can indoctrinate into their cult because they are not attracting many new members).

Every once in a while, we end up in the very front, and he watches and learns, and he wants me to hold him close during worship, so I sing the words right into his ears (and Brian chases Evelynn back and forth across the gym because, have mercy, that child never sits still).

As well as listing their vices, including murdering and betraying each other, Luther turned once again to describing the well - known examples of their doctrinal errors: «They put that noble child Mary right into the place of Christ.

i think people need to sit down and read the bible it is in there and we all have a right to preach and say what we will but god is the only judgeing person in the usa and i feel that we all need to look at what we have done instead of trying to bring the pastor of this church down and this pastor has the right to preach on what he believes and what it says in the bible i am going to follow what the bible says and in the bible it says that god says that no man and man should be in the bed togather or should no woman or woman be in the bed togather i went into town and my daughter was with me and ask me why these to woman was kissing each other now how are you to tell a child that is 7 that they are wife and wife that would sound weird

@Godpot... (God — pot... I'll have to try that... seems Dad has been holding back...) and that Moses character... I'll wager there was more than just a bush burnin» up there... (wouldn't know... me and that bird were trying to figure out the physics of stuffing «God» into a human womb right about that time... I'm thinking all these characters, not just me, were a bit «touched» as my child «Reality» likes to say...: 0)

Will we continue to force an image of a malevolent God into the minds of our children so that they continue to grow up to distrust and fight each other, to continue to deny rights to women and children in the name of the malevolent God?

Right now, however, doors are slamming and voices are raised upstairs, so I think I'd better go put my own assumptions about children and parenting, if not education right now, into some kind of forceful acRight now, however, doors are slamming and voices are raised upstairs, so I think I'd better go put my own assumptions about children and parenting, if not education right now, into some kind of forceful acright now, into some kind of forceful action.

Peyré therefore feels that «bringing an adopted child into a society in which he or she will have the same rights and the same place as other children» as the Hague Convention provides» requires that the child be received into pre-existing family structures, already recognized as such, and not serve as an instrument for obtaining recognition of new family structures.»

5:10 ------- By the way, I don't think Ananias and Sapphira would have considered themselves a loved child of God ---- that is unless you believe God killed them as punishment for lying to the Holy Spirit, just so they would go right on into paradise?

IMO, I think there is a confusion today between faith and theolgy.Many seem to be more concerned with theological correctness rather than a pure and, dare I say it, NAKED faith.Theology shld be Faith's child, we've turned it into a harsh Headmaster - don't get yr sums right, you'll be expelled.

unfortunately, the religious work tirelessly to codify their beliefs into civil law, infringing on the rights of their fellows and attempting to indoctrinate our children in public schools.

Later, he protested that he had a right not to be turned into a myth for children at American parochial schools.

I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.

Or again, if the male couple does not wish to enter into such a «partnership» with a lesbian couple, the male homosexuals can make use of the gestation services that can be provided, but only in certain foreign countries — which raises the question of the recognition of the child's rights upon the child's return to France.

This harm consists in the irreversible scrambling of three things: genealogies, by substituting «parenting» for fatherhood and motherhood; the status of the child, who would go from being a subject to being an object to which others have a right; and sexual identity, which rather than being a natural given would have to give way to orientation as an individual expression, in the name of the struggle against inequality, perverted into the elimination of differences.

This harm consists in the irreversible scrambling of three things: genealogies, by substituting «parenting» for fatherhood and motherhood; the status of the child, who would go from being a subject to being an object to which others have a right; and sexual identity as a natural given, which would have to give way to orientation as an individual expression, in the name of the struggle against inequality, perverted into the elimination of differences.

I was also beaten by random girls for no reason, put into a dumpster, tied up in an abandoned rv by some sick teens who thought that was funny, almost raped by a man while walking down the street at the age of 17 but because I screamed he only made me jack him off (at knife point), almost raped at a friend of a friend's house when we just dropped in for a minute, was impovershed growing up, even to the point where we didn't have power in the middle of winter, had to sleep all in the same bed to stay warm and used our pantry as a refrigerator, lived (and I mean LIVED) with roaches for years no matter where we moved to, was a child during the time when we had our own civil rights movement here and went through a few horrible experiences at the time.

More than just a cultured milk product (which is very yummy in its own right), I finally managed to make a yogurt my children can sink their spoons into.

Food and drink companies need to turn their words on marketing to children into action, says European consumer rights group BEUC, as it calls «game over» on marketing unhealthy food to kids.

The regulations are due to come into force on 1 December 2014, and the options to use the new Shared Parental Leave rights will apply for parents who meet the eligibility criteria, where a baby is due to be born on or after 5 April 2015, or for children who are placed for adoption on or after that date.

Most of my reading right now is parenting books, but at least I can help my children to escape into a good story even if I don't have time myself.

The film shows the students» difficulties being accepted into the mainstream education, the bureaucracy that stymies their teachers and administrators, and the passionate battle of three mothers who believe in their children's rights to a public education.

If it doesn't feel right, look into it right away, but if it's not harming anything and it's just a little uncomfortable and hard to do, but it's better for your child and yourself, then I would continue to do it for as long as you need to.