Sentences with phrase «children under a court order»

If arrangements for your children under a court order are not working out, either parent may apply to the court for the order to be changed, revoked, or enforced.

Some people share custody of their children under a court order that addresses the issue of out - of - state travel.

(1) When the intended relocation of the child is within the school district in which the child currently resides the majority of the time, the person intending to relocate the child, in lieu of notice prescribed in RCW 26.09.440, may provide actual notice by any reasonable means to every other person entitled to residential time or visitation with the child under a court order.

(2) A person who is entitled to residential time or visitation with the child under a court order may not object to the intended relocation of the child within the school district in which the child currently resides the majority of the time, but he or she retains the right to move for modification under RCW 26.09.260.

(b) are entitled to receive, or required to pay, maintenance in respect of a child under a court order;

Not exact matches

Under District of Columbia law, custody of any child (ren) of the marriage may be granted jointly or to either parent by court decision (order).

Under Maryland law, custody of any child (ren) of the marriage may be granted jointly or to either parent by court decision (order).

The distinction between ending the program and asking for a permanent injunction that would apply to the 34 districts still under court order may have eluded parents whose children could have been made ineligible.

Under the court order, the state must send a spreadsheet with extensive information on each voucher applicant, including name, address and race; the public school, if any, the child attended the previous year; and the private school he or she would like to attend with the voucher.

«The Court of Appeals finding properly acknowledges that the school district's responsibility under the IDEA is not to cure or remediate all effects of a child's disability, but to serve students with a demonstrated «need» for special education and related services in order to benefit from his or her education,» said NSBA Associate Executive Director and General Counsel Francisco M. Negrón, Jr. «Given that the student in this case is academically successful, it may be more appropriate to address non-educational concerns through other accommodations.»

The growth in the gap in North Carolina is especially important because the state has been under court order to expand pre-K programs for at - risk children.

The term «forced busing» came into use in many cities that were under court - order to bus children.

Boston, Cleveland, Kansas City, San Francisco, Detroit and Wilmington were among the cities under court order to bus children.

However, under Canadian law, certain debts remain even in Bankruptcy: student loans less than seven years old, spousal or child support, alimony, debt arising from fraud, restitution orders and any court imposed fines.

However, certain debts are not dischargeable under Chapter 7; most student loans, recent taxes, alimony, child and court ordered support payments and drunk driving judgment.

As well, in many provinces these limits don't apply to those who are self - employed, or owe child support / alimony under a court order.

Most types of debt except: student loans, magistrates» court fines, maintenance payments or maintenance arrears ordered by a court, Child Support Agency or Child Maintenance Service arrears, money owed under a criminal confiscation order, debts resulting from certain personal injury claims and budgeting or crisis loans.

Most debts except: fines, penalties, compensation and forfeiture orders imposed by any court; any debt that has been incurred through fraud; student loans; any obligation to pay maintenance to an ex-spouse due under a court order (not Child Support Agency arrears or Child Maintenance Service arrears); and money owed to a creditor whose debt is secured on your property (such as a mortgage or secured loan).

In this case the Court of Appeal held that the father's obligation under the contact order was to «allow contact» and make the child available.

In B v S [2009] All ER D119 (Dec) the court had to consider whether committing the mother of a three month old child to prison following persistent breaches of a contact order would infringe her child's right to a private and family life (under Art 8 of the Human Rights Convention).

This application is made to the Family Proceedings Court under the Children (NI) Order 1995.

[196] Under s. 39 of the FLA, each parent of the child is the child's guardian unless after separation the court makes an order providing that a parent is not the child's guardian.

Posted Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation

Heartless bypass The ECtHR stated in its judgment that had the authority sought to evict the husband under the Housing Act 1985, s 84, it would have been open to him to ask the court to determine whether or not the wife had really left the home because of domestic violence and whether or not, in his personal circumstances, including his need to provide accommodation for his children during overnight visits several time a week, it was reasonable to grant a possession order.

It is suggested that the agreement will be legally binding under s 9 (1) and (2) of the Child Support Act 1991 and its existence will entitle the court to make an order under s 4 (10) which will have the effect of preventing any further child support calculation for 12 moChild Support Act 1991 and its existence will entitle the court to make an order under s 4 (10) which will have the effect of preventing any further child support calculation for 12 mochild support calculation for 12 months.

Claims are made under Sch 1 of the Children Act 1989 and, when making orders, the court will consider factors which are very similar to those which would be considered within the context of a divorce.

A new application form The C100 is being introduced for orders under the Children Act 1989 s 8 in place of the C1 which includes new questions about the use of mediation before going to court and is more user friendly with simplifi ed language and additional direct questions and «tick box» responses.

Parental involvement s 11 On an opposed application to make, vary or discharge an order under s 8 of the Children Act 1989, or where the court is considering whether or not to make a parental responsibility order, a rebuttable presumption is raised that involvement of the parents — of some direct or indirect kind but not any particular division of a child's time — will further the child's welfare.

It is an alternative to a docket appearance in court before a judge when an applicant files a claim for a parenting order, guardianship order, contact order or an order to enforce time with a child under the Family Law Act.

Having a second hearing after a guardian has investigated and discovery has been conducted allows the court to determine how accurate the submissions at the initial hearing were and how well the child (ren) are doing under the initial custody order.

Maintenance Enforcement Program: The Alberta Maintenance Enforcement Program (MEP) is authorized by the Alberta Maintenance Enforcement Act to ensure that individuals meet their obligations to pay spousal and child support under the terms of their court orders and certain agreements.

Under Tennessee law, the court shall issue a temporary order of child support in cases of disputed paternity.

On the same date the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) introduced revised statutory guidance for care and supervision order proceedings («Court Orders» of the Children Act guidance under s 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970) and a new practice direction for the use and instruction of experts in family proceedings relating to cChildren, Schools and Families (DCSF) introduced revised statutory guidance for care and supervision order proceedings («Court Orders» of the Children Act guidance under s 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970) and a new practice direction for the use and instruction of experts in family proceedings relating to cChildren Act guidance under s 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970) and a new practice direction for the use and instruction of experts in family proceedings relating to childrenchildren.

Section 281 (5) provides as follows: «Discharge does not, except to such extent and on such conditions as the court may direct, release the bankrupt from any bankruptcy debt which --(a) consists in a liability to pay damages [of specific types]... in respect of personal injuries to any person; or (b) arises under any order made in family proceedings or under a maintenance calculation made under the Child Support Act 1991.»

(3) If a person having a duty to pay child support or spousal support under an agreement or order dies and the agreement or order is silent respecting whether the duty continues after the death of the person and is a debt of his or her estate, (a) the person receiving support may make an application under section 149 [orders respecting child support] or 165 [orders respecting spousal support], and (b) if, on consideration of the factors set out in subsection (1) of this section, an order is made, the duty to pay child support or spousal support continues despite the death of the person and is a debt of his or her estate for the period fixed by the court.

If your child is confined in a protective safe house under a PChAD court order, he / she will be given:

In these circumstances an urgent application needs to be made to the High Court in England requesting the Court to exercise its vast powers under what is called the Inherent Jurisdiction, such as making the children a Ward of the Court and ordering the abducting parent to return the children.

Posted Monday, July 27th, 2015 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Support, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific

When making an order under s 8 of the Children Act 1989, the court must have regard to the welfare checklist set out at s 1 (3).

The testator may be required, by court order or under a domestic contract, to pay support to a dependent ex-spouse or child.

Section 24 (5) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 — «where (a) an application for the revocation of a placement order has been made and has not been disposed of, and (b) the child is not placed for adoption by the authority, the child may not without the court's leave be placed for adoption under the order» — applies only where a substantive application for the revocation of a placement order has been made, ie the applicant, having got over the leave hurdle, is making a substantive application which, consequent upon the grant of leave, would be likely to have been perceived as having a real prospect of success.

[228] In making a custody order under s. 16 (1) of the DA, the court shall not take into consideration the past conduct of any person unless the conduct is relevant to the ability of that person to act as a parent of a child (s. 16 (9)-RRB-.

Additionally, in making a custody order under s. 16 (1), the court shall give effect to the principle that a child of the marriage should have as much contact with each spouse as is consistent with the best interests of the child and, for that purpose, shall take into consideration the willingness of the person for whom custody is sought to facilitate such contact (s. 16 (10)-RRB-.

Specifically, Germany's noncompliance relates to the unwillingness of some courts to enforce orders for the return of children, or access to children, under the Convention.

Under Florida law, if a parent is unemployed or underemployed by his or her own choice, the court can order child support based on the amount of income he or she could earn by pursuing more gainful employment.

I and my ex spouse agreed under a separation agreement incorporated, merged into and made part of the court order for a settlement of Child Support, Spouse Support and Medical Support of $ 1,036,570.00 USD he has only paid $ 350,500.00 February 18th, 2013 but still owing $ 686,070.00 and the stipulated time for the completion of payment May 17th, 2013 has long elapsed.

Posted Friday, August 27th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Support, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments»

When the Superior Court has jurisdiction over the custody and maintenance of the minor children of parents divorced, separated or living separate, and such children are natives of this State, or have resided five years within its limits, they shall not be removed out of its jurisdiction against their own consent, if of suitable age to signify the same, nor while under that age without the consent of both parents, unless the court, upon cause shown, shall otherwise oCourt has jurisdiction over the custody and maintenance of the minor children of parents divorced, separated or living separate, and such children are natives of this State, or have resided five years within its limits, they shall not be removed out of its jurisdiction against their own consent, if of suitable age to signify the same, nor while under that age without the consent of both parents, unless the court, upon cause shown, shall otherwise ocourt, upon cause shown, shall otherwise order.

There is no such thing as a care order for adults and the jurisdiction is not to be equated with the jurisdiction of family courts under the Children Act 1989 or the wardship jurisdiction of the High Court (para 24).

A minor child of divorced parents who is a native of or has resided five years within this commonwealth and over whose custody and maintenance a probate court has jurisdiction shall not, if of suitable age to signify his consent, be removed out of this commonwealth without such consent, or, if under that age, without the consent of both parents, unless the court upon cause shown otherwise orders.