Our nation has «consistently and purposely underserved students of color,» notes Julian Vasquez Heilig, Professor of Educational Policy and Planning at University of Texas Austin, in a 2013 Texas Education Review article on the current reframing of school
choice as a civil rights issue.
Or this from Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, «Imagine embracing school
choice as the civil rights issue of the next generation.
Some parents of color are strong advocates for school
choice as a civil right, for example, yet the NAACP opposes vouchers and has called for a moratorium on charter schools.
Brown v. Board was about school
choice as a civil rights issue.
Not exact matches
«It was those kinds of things, but
as more options opened some of that was diffused in some places,» she said, noting the increase in
choices came after the
civil rights movement of the 1960s.
Equal opportunity in choosing a school A recent Wall Street Journal editorial had it
right in criticizing
civil rights groups like the NAACP for not jumping on the educational
choice bandwagon since,
as the Journal says, «reform's main beneficiaries are poor and minority students in places like Harlem and New Orleans.»
Currently, parents may choose a better school when their child's school fails to make AYP, but
as the Lawyers» Committee for
Civil Rights Under Law has called it, the
choice option is «a
right without a remedy.»
In his book, Bolick describes how he helped orchestrate the mainstream media's first use of
civil rights language in defense of school
choice while discrediting a voucher opponent
as «blocking the schoolhouse door to minority children.»
The neoliberal privatization movement has presented «
choice»
as a
civil rights effort — and
as the only option for changing the status quo for these historically underserved students of color.
Louisiana for Children President Ann Duplessis discusses school
choice as a moral and
civil right.
«The newest and one of the most potent arguments for advancing school
choice in Pennsylvania has been pressed forward by state Sen. Anthony Williams, D - Philadelphia, and a handful of urban lawmakers who see the issue
as the next step in the
civil rights movement.»
Save for a few NAACP branches (including its affiliate in Connecticut, have stepped up in the discussions over Gov. Dan Malloy's school reform effort, and advocated on behalf of Bridgeport mother Tanya McDowell, who will serve five years for trying to provide her child with a high - quality school), the nation's oldest
civil rights group offers nothing substantial on addressing issues such
as ending Zip Code Education policies, expanding school
choice, addressing childhood illiteracy, and revamping how teachers are recruited, trained, paid, and evaluated (especially when it comes to bringing more black men into the teaching profession).
Ironically,
as Weingarten wages war on charter schools (and every other kind of school
choice that would benefit kids and parents), she managed to pick up the Hubert H. Humphrey
Civil and Human
Rights Award, «for her lifelong commitment to improving America's education system.»
«If people who have an equality orientation and a
civil rights orientation see themselves
as on the outside of the movement for school
choice, then the only people who are going to be left are people who have different motivations.
«This report compiles skewed and incomplete data that, in the authors» own words, is largely based on «assumptions» and «suggestions,» and it neglects to take into consideration important factors, such
as parental
choice, the similarity of student populations between inner city charters and inner city traditional schools, and that charter schools intentionally locate in neighborhoods with the greatest need, a fact that we would hope champions of
civil rights would celebrate, not condemn.
This doesn't mean that Wake County's efforts to go back to zoned schools makes sense;
as discussed on last week on Dropout Nation, restricting school
choice is antithetical to ensuring that education is the
civil right it is supposed to be.
Under whatever name you call it: «turnaround schools,» «Commissioner's Network,» or «schools of
choice,» the bottom line is that citizens in the communities designated
as under - performing based on these inadequately - developed and unproven tests have been stripped of their
civil rights.
Therefore, they suggested speaking of «
choice»
as the «
civil rights issue» of our time.
Now we have a president who «love [s] the poorly educated,» who makes up his own «facts,» who's never been accountable to anyone and intends to keep it that way, who blathers about «
choice»
as a
civil rights issue —
as have the two presidents before him; only he, with DeVos, the least qualified Secretary of Education this country's ever had, will do what none has done before, what most voters don't approve, legalize vouchers and route public funding into religious schools, thereby undermining another foundation of our democracy, the separation of church and state.
Reactions have ranged from outrage and disgust that once again self - published authors were being treated
as amateurs, wannabes, and «aspiring authors,» to anger at indie authors for trying to liken their plight to the
civil rights movement with Howey's
choice of title and comments along the lines of, «It's like shades of Jim Crow when blacks had to sit in the back of the bus...» [1.
Norris, whose family is from Birmingham, says this
choice is perfect for January because the book will «entertain and inform young readers
as the country remembers the
civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. for the national holiday in his name.»
We continue to be recognised
as a leading set in our other specialist practice areas including Public Law («the go - to set for any heavyweight piece of work»),
Civil Liberties and Human Rights («a strong choice for a wide range of civil liberties work»), and Public Procurement («for many the top set for public and EU law&raq
Civil Liberties and Human
Rights («a strong
choice for a wide range of
civil liberties work»), and Public Procurement («for many the top set for public and EU law&raq
civil liberties work»), and Public Procurement («for many the top set for public and EU law»).