You aren't sure what the best
choice is for your child.
Not exact matches
Unless you
're living in a society with arranged marriages, however, this
is much more about your
children's
choices than anything you can do
for them as a parent.
If you don't think enough of your own finances how
are you ever going to make the difficult decisions and necessary
choices for your spouse,
children, community, and your future?
the results
are encouraging
for parents who struggle to get their
children to make healthy food
choices even when they
are available:
Astronauts
are a popular
choice for children this year, according to Angel, who said this has a lot to do with Tim Peake becoming the first British astronaut to walk in space.
The most effective use of reverse psychology
for parents hoping to push older kids towards wise
choices isn't to actively manipulate them towards your desired aim — i.e. by fake nonchalantly asking if perhaps your
child would like to give up a sport or AP class - but rather to hand control back to a kid who feels like they
're already
being pushed toward a particular future.
By loudly owning her
choices, Sandberg makes it a little safer
for the rest of us to declare that parents working late into the night
is killer on families (Mashable points to research «that
children are healthier, happier and better performing students when they eat with their families») and on personal productivity and health, making it a bit easier
for those of us with less lofty positions to take back our schedules and admit that we need to work saner hours.
Versatile: The product
is a suitable product
choice for children, beginning from birth to toddlerhood.
That the cuts
are paired with some tax increases on individuals, like the elimination of the deduction
for state and local income taxes and the Social Security number requirement, which kicks some 3 million kids off the
child tax credit, makes the
choice even more confounding.
That the cuts
are pared with some tax increases on individuals, like the elimination of the deduction
for state and local income taxes and the Social Security Number requirement which kicks some 3 million kids off the
child tax credit, makes the
choice even more confounding.
Starting a day care business
is a great
choice for people who love
children.
If you have limited resources to devote to life insurance or you only need coverage
for a limited period (e.g., until your
children finish college), term insurance may
be the right
choice for you.
Key to his platform
were a flat tax, medical savings accounts, a new Social Security system
for working Americans, parental
choice of schools
for their
children, term limits and a strong national defense.
He
is not perfect nor
is he abnormal but he certainly isn't prime in the sense that given the
choice I think anyone would choose
for their
child to not have to overcome such a burden.
TO choose between him or Mitt Romney a man who
is evil I have no
choice but to vote
for President Obama, To cut a
child's hair off and commit the crime he did in school
is a lot different than a little boy pushing a little girl because of embarassment.
If you
are for a
choice and one
choice is to choose to carry the
child, what do you want on the other plate?
I
'm speaking about my own faith only: To become a Christian, it must
be your own
choice.No else can decide this life style
for you.I know many in the past and present have thought raising a
child under the Christian label will save them
for hell but in actual reality, the
choice is their own not their parents etc.This life (
being Christian) goes deeper than just believing.You have to consider this yourself.Many today do not even consider Christ as their savior because they just believe what their church or family says.
Animals, as you know, do not sin, so
for you,
being godless
is your
choice to become animal like rather than a
child of God.
My condolences
for all those that
were brainwashed as
children and had no
choice, and
for those who
are too weak minded to admit the truth.
Parents
were put to a cruel
choice: either give up their plans
for a religious education or forfeit their
child's right to the kind of remedial education program Congress provides
for all other
children.
The media hounded Tim Farron
for his Christian views; they did not regard it as acceptable
for him to hold views other than those of the political elite, or the majority, Similarly, our belief in the personhood of the unborn
child and the sanctity of their lives enables us to see abortion as a sin crying to heaven
for justice, not merely some privately held opinion;
for us it
is most definitely not «a woman's
choice».
They have already made their
choice for the life of their
children, and unfortunately they
are the majority of parents in our society.
Contraception lets her
be an atomized individual, whose sexual
choices have no broader repercussions, not
for her mother, and certainly not
for the boy who fathered her
child.
That
is why I determined that no matter what, my
children would never
be made to endure shame, shunning and guilt
for their sexual
choices.
Christian education
is in the world and
for the world... man must work out his salvation in the concrete situation in which God has placed him; not by protection but by contributing to the whole human community of which he
is an integral and inseparable part... parents, who have the first and the inalienable right and duty to educate their
children, should enjoy true freedom in the
choice of their schools, etc..»
(vital statistics from NYS Dept of Health, obtainable on line)
For those of us who believe that the right of
choice should
be made before the embroyo, fetus, or
child is ripped apart; the cost to the taxpayers pales in the destruction of the innocents.
Emilia's
choice might
be affected by lack of adequate financial support and
child care options
for her as a teen parent.
And this means that, as a quite concrete historical condition, the only
choice that remains
for the
children of post-Christian culture
is not whom to serve, but whether to serve Him whom Christ has revealed or to serve nothing — the nothing.
Wayne C. Lusvardi
is right to underscore that certain things» unborn
children,
for instance, or body parts, or drugs» shouldn't
be subject to the logic of
choice that prevails in a free market.
Obama, like much of Academia,
is divergent from reality and therefore the rube like businessman
is the best
choice for an economy that will better serve the poor and
children of a lesser god.
It
is for this reason that parents should
be given the right to send their
children to schools of their
choice, provided certain minimal standards of safety and competency
are satisfied, and should not
be required to utilize state educational facilities.
In short, the
choice for Christian clerics
is either the perfection of celibacy, or marriage adorned by the procreation of
children.
She has both her Masters in Theology and a Masters in Education, and yet she writes: «I
am in a very difficult and life - threatening marital situation and it
is imperative that my
children and I get to safety as soon as possible (before I become a statistic of domestic violence)...»
For her the ethical
choice is clear whether to live on in a farcical and dangerous relationship so as to serve the demands made on her by society... or to protect herself and her
children.
This perspective unmistakably reveals the unwholesomeness, not to put it more strongly, of our way of life: our obsession with sex, violence, and the pornography of «making it;» our addictive dependence on drugs, «entertainment,» and the evening news; our impatience with anything that limits our sovereign freedom of
choice, especially with the constraints of marital and familial ties; our preference
for «nonbinding commitments;» our third - rate educational system; our third - rate morality; our refusal to draw a distinction between right and wrong, lest we «impose» their morality on us; our reluctance to judge or
be judged; our indifference to the needs of future generations, as evidence by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal of destruction, and a deteriorating environment; our unsated assumption, which underlies so much of the propaganda
for unlimited abortion, that only those
children born
for success ought to
be allowed to
be born at all.
Private schools, charter schools, voucher programs and other school
choice options have
been championed by reform - minded conservatives such as Jeb Bush
for years now, partly because of their success
for countless
children of color living in poor communities with even poorer - performing public schools.
Yet we feel deep sympathy and empathy
for the woman who agonizes over her
choice, and finally decides that abortion
is the best, most caring decision she can make
for herself, the fetus, and other
children she may have.
The
choice of the name reflects a statement to
be defiantly Muslim when one
's children are being denied the opportunity to become British If the Brits do not solve their problem with assimilating Muslims into British society, theu will
be laying the groundowrk
for a fifth column path
for terrorists and extremists.
In «Adoption, Abortion and a Message of Hope,» J.D. Flynn makes an important point: the
choice to place a
child for adoption
is a heroic sacrifice, borne in suffering, which we must always acknowledge and honor.
The Jews
are not by nature
children of God because they
are human
beings, but have become
children by God's free
choice and by the deeds which He has done
for them.
Adoption
is often the selfless
choice to give
children what parents don't have — the financial, emotional, or personal resources required
for a lifelong commitment to parenting.
Her vehicle of
choice these days
is a Chevrolet Suburban, which has enough room
for her, her husband and four
children.
As between the old Christian America, which did, it can not
be denied, visit the Jews with certain discomforts, and the new atheist America, which goes straight
for the jugular of their
children and their
children's
children, how can America's Jews feel there
is even any
choice?
I love it when the unlearned come out and play, You say He
is vicious it
is really protection and your own decisions make the
choice for you as you
are finding out and when it comes to perversion of truth, love leading His people astray He
is so much more than a angry mother protecting her
children.
When thou shinest in the royal city, the rich man
is sated with good things, the poor man even disdains the lotus; all that
is produced
is of the
choicest; all the plants exist
for thy
children.
Also, if one would read Genesis - Malachi then one would know these question asked by Smithsonian, how we
were created, and why evil came about, and to help, YHWH made us
for His own sake unconditionally; He gave us a
choice to decide with our own hearts what, or who we want to
be in this world, as well as to who we'll
be to HIM, whether
being righteous, obedient
children, or not the
choice is ours we
're responsible
for our own righteousness in Ezekiel 14:14 - 21.
Operating under the myth that sexual involvement
is always delayed until marriage and that the family
is the only normal setting
for child - rearing, this coalition opposes programs of «optional parenthood» in which having a
child is a matter of
choice rather than of chance.
You
are just angry because you feel that presenting
children with multiple
choices of belief attacks your monopoly on faith that Christians have enjoyed in the country
for centuries.
Well, as an atheist I understand the concern that young
children will
be indoctrinated into an ideology and not taught to make
choices for themselves and to
be independent.
«That mother, I feel, has
been charged by God to make the right
choices for that
child during its unborn and early born years.»
Indoctrinating
children (ie: brainwashing them and taking away any real
choice they make
for themselves)
is horrible.