In personal life,
choices of right and wrong come down to balancing the competing moral claims of self and family, personal security and professional interests, short - term and long - run good.
Every normal individual beyond infancy has enough freedom to make
choices of right and wrong; no individual has enough freedom to do everything he wants to do.
Not exact matches
In this context ethical «tone» means the mood or tenor that a leader sets with regard to
choices between
right and wrong, between more
and less admirable forms
of behaviour.
This episode from Esther offers us great encouragement
and comfort when we find ourselves in situations where every
choice is an odd mix
of right and wrong.
Do not say there is not a
right and wrong in this debate; there's a
right,
and an ignorance
of the
right, whether that ignorance is because
of lack
of education in biology / chemistry / theoretical physics or a
choice to ignore facts so that a person can comfortably keep their faith intact or both.
To your last point, when I said
choice is an illusion, I wasn't referring that it is impossible to make that
choice, but rather that there is a «
right»
choice and a «
wrong»
choice, the «
right» one being that you worship god, regardless
of how weird some
of the rituals might be, making you a little more than a robot, acting out a script your given, we're just slightly better because we can justify why we're acting out a command, but it takes years to understand that justification, in the beginning, you do these rituals because you're given a script
and if you don't want to do it, tough.
This perspective unmistakably reveals the unwholesomeness, not to put it more strongly,
of our way
of life: our obsession with sex, violence,
and the pornography
of «making it;» our addictive dependence on drugs, «entertainment,»
and the evening news; our impatience with anything that limits our sovereign freedom
of choice, especially with the constraints
of marital
and familial ties; our preference for «nonbinding commitments;» our third - rate educational system; our third - rate morality; our refusal to draw a distinction between
right and wrong, lest we «impose» their morality on us; our reluctance to judge or be judged; our indifference to the needs
of future generations, as evidence by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal
of destruction,
and a deteriorating environment; our unsated assumption, which underlies so much
of the propaganda for unlimited abortion, that only those children born for success ought to be allowed to be born at all.
I'm sure there are plenty
of Christians who would recognize Gov. Brewers decision as the
right choice and the bill passed by the Arizona Senate as being
wrong.
There is no «rock
and a hard place» set
of choices here for Christians, nor is there any in Nigeria
and Uganda on the front
of basic human
rights that Christians themselves helped define
and defend: We are called to speak the truth in love, to oppose what is
wrong,
and to do so whether or not it is culturally comfortable or politically secure.
This is a simple
choice of right vs
wrong and reality is
right and mysticism is undeniably
wrong!
Third, when we say that a
wrong act is a sin, even if we do not conceive
of God as standing in judgment we are still pointing out that there is another dimension involved in our
choices between
right and wrong.
It would mean that there was a standard
of right that existed independent
of Walt's will
and it would mean facing not only that he made a
wrong choice, but also that he had thrown away a precious gift.
If you're going to say anything you have 2
choices: «God was
right and I think slavery is just as groovy» or «God was
wrong and instead
of instructed how to «appropriately» treat slaves, He should have plainly told everyone slavery was
wrong and to release any slaves immediately.»
And since some people are incapable of knowing right from wrong, and making any choice either way either through age or handicap, the Bible tells us of a special grace that exists over certain individuals should they d
And since some people are incapable
of knowing
right from
wrong,
and making any choice either way either through age or handicap, the Bible tells us of a special grace that exists over certain individuals should they d
and making any
choice either way either through age or handicap, the Bible tells us
of a special grace that exists over certain individuals should they die.
Except when folks are in a funk, drunk, in France, or at a university, almost all
of them seem to believe that some things are really
right and wrong and not just
right and wrong because they happen to think so today or because natural selection has programmed them with the illusion that some
of their
choices are more virtuous than others.
And God has determined we are better off learning from the process
of executing our own free will as well as dealing with others who do too, even if they make the
wrong choice, rather than forcing us to only do what's
right.
And you're right, sometimes even Martha gets it wrong and Taylor can't seem to make a good choice if it's in front of her perky little no
And you're
right, sometimes even Martha gets it
wrong and Taylor can't seem to make a good choice if it's in front of her perky little no
and Taylor can't seem to make a good
choice if it's in front
of her perky little nose.
I am not asking if it is
right or
wrong of Wenger to support his boss, just show me a piece
of evidence to prove Wenger is the one making the
choices and not the OWNER.
I written why I thought the authors post has failed in logic, I may be
wrong but I did say that a
Right sided AM or a player who could play their for us would be more
of a logical
choice when looking at Wenger
and the type
of players he likes to buy.
Cech is not good with Pennos, top top professional but in guessing the
right way he is always
wrong, he shimmies a little to one or both sides
and then can not go full stretch to the side
of his
choice,
and he never waits long enough to see if it's coming straight down the barrel.
At
right back, it was the 19 - year old Timothy Fosu - Mensah that started in place
of second -
choice Mateo Darmian
and the Dutchman hardly put a foot
wrong and often supported the side with aggressive forward runs.
While second - wave feminism got so many things so very
right,
and made possible a great many
of the career
and life
choices my generation
of women enjoys today, many in that group
of feminist thinkers got one thing fundamentally
wrong,
and that is this: even for those
of us who are also productively employed outside the home — whether by
choice, necessity or both — our most valued, fulfilling role is the one we take on as mothers to our children.
There is no
right or
wrong length
of time; it comes down to your family's needs
and the
choices you have made.
This is my opinion all moms have that internal knowledge
of when it is the
right time or not
and when your baby is sick
and something helps it to sleep or stop crying how could that be the
wrong choice.
Regardless
of the reasons behind the
choice, parents
and caregivers need to understand there are
right and wrong ways to warm up breastmilk.
Or maybe Amazon, I think, discovered that people wanted to view PDF files on the Kindle
and their PDF browser is really terrible;
and, in fact, [the] smaller Kindle couldn't view PDFs at all until a recent software update, so I do think that these manufacturers always make some
choices about what people are going to want
and what they don't want
and find that some
of those
choices are
right and some
of those
choices are just
wrong.
They consist
of «stacks»
of «cards» that review each chapter, with sets
of multiple
choice questions,
and responses that explain why answers are either
right or
wrong.
And while my career is evolving through various detours and side - steps, at the end of the day I believe we make all our career choices work for us — there is no right or wrong answ
And while my career is evolving through various detours
and side - steps, at the end of the day I believe we make all our career choices work for us — there is no right or wrong answ
and side - steps, at the end
of the day I believe we make all our career
choices work for us — there is no
right or
wrong answer.
Everywhere I look, individual
choices are deemed
right versus
wrong or good versus bad, when the reality
of the situation is that if you are conscious enough to make an effort to improve your health
and fitness, you are likely working toward the same goal.
If you can adopt a learning mindset instead
of one that pigeonholes your life
and choices into categories
of right /
wrong or good / bad, everything will shift
and open up inside
of you.
ExRated's mission is to «empower singles by giving them character reviews
of potential dates,
and allow them to express themselves through multiple
choice reviews designed to help them realize what went
wrong in the past
and how to make the
right dating
choices in the future.»
Wrong about us being on different paths... we're not on different paths... you're my path...
and you're always going to be my path...
and I know there are a million reasons why we shouldn't be together... but I'm tired
of them... I'm tired
of every single one
of them... we all got to make a
choice...
right?
It has one
of the best morality systems in any game ever, there is no red or blue
choice, there's no
right or
wrong choice, it's all about how you survive
and what you let the world turn you into.
The first half
of Right Now,
Wrong Then fits the usual mold, but the real joke begins when the movie abruptly starts over, our hero making subtly different
choices the second time around in the rich
and playful revision.
The idea
of using portfolios
and being able to have something other than a multiple
choice /
right -
wrong question as a way
of assessment is around.
The controversy as school
choice philanthropist
and GOP donor Betsy DeVos took office as the U.S. secretary
of education this year might conjure up sentiments from the old Buffalo Springfield song: «Nobody's
right when everybody's
wrong.»
In an earlier, unpublished draft
of the paper, which Blazar shared with me, he
and Pollard described how students spent an entire hour doing multiple -
choice practice questions
and received no feedback other than whether they were
right or
wrong.
Seeing the high ratio
of negative to positive behaviors, his teacher began to carefully shift the focus from what he was doing
wrong to what he was doing
right in order to strengthen the relationship
and motivate him to make better
choices.
Existentialist philosophy concerns itself with many
of the themes that make up the novel Nothing, particularly individualism, responsibility,
choice and knowing (or trying to know)
right from
wrong.
Fur Before Feathers by Roh Morgon — The
choices between
right and wrong take on a few extra twists in this coming -
of - age tale about a young shapeshifter.
your
choice of a 360 or Wii is no less
right or
wrong,
and is completely your personal preference.
There's no neon signs screaming that this
choice is
right and that one
wrong, instead it's just your own morality
and the consequences
of your decision,
and even when you think you've made the morally correct
choice it can often lead to horrible results.
Devil Survivor 2's implementation is much more simplistic as almost all
of the
choice require a single «correct»
choice to be picked up gain any Fate points
and some
of the «
wrong»
choices don't deviate the dialogue as much as one would expect
and throw off the «this is the
right choice, this is the
wrong choice» deduction.
This isn't a simple
choice of go it alone or work as a team, each squad member has a different personality
and will respond differently to your actions, meaning there's no
right and wrong, just your way
of play.
Unlike other games with dialogue or personality systems Binary Domain's Consequence System is not a simple
choice of good or bad or
right and wrong.
The reward for making the
right choice must be proportionate to the risk
of making the
wrong one
and the player has to care about that
choice.
This is not a matter
of wrong and right, it is a matter
of choice by members
of society
and those who represent them.
We must use Copenhagen to rise above the petty politics
of climate change, to instead recognize it as a clearly moral issue, with a clear
choice between what is
right and what is morally
wrong.
Now don't get me
wrong, if you've identified that firm culture
and teamwork are areas that need significant improvement, then having a retreat agenda that is full
of teaming events
and socialization,
and is light on conference room located workshops, could be the
right choice.
And so I went to law school hoping to learn a little bit more about what's behind the curtain and how our society makes choices, how we choose right from wrong, how we pick winners and losers, and how I can maybe help implement some of those policy choices along the w
And so I went to law school hoping to learn a little bit more about what's behind the curtain
and how our society makes choices, how we choose right from wrong, how we pick winners and losers, and how I can maybe help implement some of those policy choices along the w
and how our society makes
choices, how we choose
right from
wrong, how we pick winners
and losers, and how I can maybe help implement some of those policy choices along the w
and losers,
and how I can maybe help implement some of those policy choices along the w
and how I can maybe help implement some
of those policy
choices along the way.