Sentences with phrase «choices under risk»

Not exact matches

Since the early 1990s, government policy on maternity care in England has moved towards policies designed to give women with straightforward pregnancies a choice of settings for birth.1 2 In this context, freestanding midwifery units, midwifery units located in the same building or on the same site as an obstetric unit (hereafter referred to as alongside midwifery units), and home birth services have increasingly become relevant to the configuration of maternity services under consideration in England.3 The relative benefits and risks of birth in these alternative settings have been widely debated in recent years.4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Lower rates of obstetric interventions and other positive maternal outcomes have been consistently found in planned births at home and in midwifery units, but clear conclusions regarding perinatal outcome have been lacking.

Unlike adolescents» choices in the context of full information, their behavior under ambiguity and uncertainty also correlated with their self - reported risk - taking in the real world.

But if your childs asthma is so bad that he or she is at risk for hospitalization, doctors may have no choice but to put him or her on the much stronger oral corticosteroids — at least temporarily — to get the asthma under control.

The NYS Charter Schools Act of 1998 was created for the following purposes: • Improve student learning and achievement; • Increase learning opportunities for all students, with special emphasis on expanded learning experiences for students who are at - risk of academic failure; • Encourage the use of different and innovative teaching methods; • Create new professional opportunities for teachers, school administrators and other school personnel; • Provide parents and students with expanded choices in the types of educational opportunities that are available within the public school system; and • Provide schools with a method to change from rule - based to performance - based accountability systems by holding the schools established under this article accountable for meeting measurable student achievement results.

However, these changes do not address the fundamental issue of funding inequity for all students.,, Public schools of choice are still not included in the state funding formula and their students are therefore at risk of being treated differently under challenging funding conditions.

While the funding increase to make expenditures at schools of choice more aligned with traditional school district expenditures is laudable, these changes do not address the fundamental issue of funding inequity: that public schools of choice are not included in ECS and their students are therefore at risk of being treated differently under challenging funding conditions.

[2] Despite the risks that accompany these localized policies, the huge changes and successes under the competency model were made possible by the freedom, flexibility, and choice granted to schools to create programs to help students in very different communities and situations as opposed to more stifling national mandates.

Given the fact that Amazon made video a key app for this device, the choice of an under - powered processor to run the Kindle was a calculated risk tied to cost as opposed to design for a superior user experience.

However, considering they're under $ 300, one could take a risk, but that's their choice.

If you want to borrow money with no hassle and don't want to put your personal assets under the risk, then an unsecured is a perfect choice for you.

However, for those brave souls that are willing to assume a little more risk, they can, under the right conditions, be a very profitable choice.

The treatment of choice is an ovariohysterectomy where the uterus and the ovaries are removed; the surgery is relatively safe (there are always the risk of complications in any surgery) especially since the pyometra is open, meaning there isn't high quantities of infected material under pressure in the uterus which may cause it to rupture like in some severe cases of closed pyometra.

The foundational work on the psychology of decision - making under uncertainty has been collected into several volumes: «Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,» by Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (Cambridge, 1982), «Choices, Values, and Frames,» by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (Cambridge, 2000), «Heuristics and Biases,» by Thomas Golovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman (Cambridge, 2002), and «The Perception of Risk,» by Paul Slovic (Earthscan, 2under uncertainty has been collected into several volumes: «Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,» by Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (Cambridge, 1982), «Choices, Values, and Frames,» by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (Cambridge, 2000), «Heuristics and Biases,» by Thomas Golovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman (Cambridge, 2002), and «The Perception of Risk,» by Paul Slovic (Earthscan, 2Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,» by Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, and Amos Tversky (Cambridge, 1982), «Choices, Values, and Frames,» by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (Cambridge, 2000), «Heuristics and Biases,» by Thomas Golovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman (Cambridge, 2002), and «The Perception of Risk,» by Paul Slovic (Earthscan, 2000).

Dewes C., I. Rangwala, J. J. Barsugli, M. T. Hobbins and S. Kumar (March 2017): Drought risk assessment under climate change is sensitive to methodological choices for the estimation of evaporative demand.

The premiums net of charges can be invested under two objectives — Do - it - yourself where the policyholder has a choice of 9 investment funds in which he can invest the premium in desired proportion or leave - it - to - us where the company manages the funds as per the customer's risk profile of cautious, moderate and aggressive.

This in turn has made these policies much less palatable to consumers, who face the unappetizing choice of spending a substantial chunk of change now on a policy that they may never need or risk getting crushed under exorbitant bills from a managed care provider at some point in the future.

Under this strategy, the policyholder can invest the premium in any of the available funds as per his choice based on the risk appetite.