Many researchers, however, have rejected the saturated fat and
cholesterol theory as a cause of heart disease because more than 60 percent of all heart attacks occur in people with normal cholesterol levels and the majority of people with high cholesterol levels never have heart attacks.
Many researchers, however, have rejected the saturated - fat - and -
cholesterol theory as a cause of heart disease, because more than 60 percent of all heart attacks occur in people with normal cholesterol levels and the majority of people with high cholesterol levels never have heart attacks.
Not exact matches
The role of inflammation and the value of CRP
as a predictor are still very much open to debate, and even supporters of the inflammation
theory admit that it is unlikely to become more important than
cholesterol.
This
theory is simply not true,
as long
as the saturates are of a certain type, and the
cholesterol is not oxidized.
HDL — the good
cholesterol doesn't bear the whole brunt of the journey back a.k.a Reverse Cholesterol Transfer as the original the
cholesterol doesn't bear the whole brunt of the journey back a.k.a Reverse
Cholesterol Transfer as the original the
Cholesterol Transfer
as the original
theory has it.
And
as the final lines of the Telegraph article you cited, said: «To suggest that the
theory relating saturated fat to increased total
cholesterol is flawed, is nonsense, and contradicts 50 years of evidence - based medicine»