The famous Framingham Study is the foundation and basis of
the cholesterol theory of heart disease.
It seems unlikey that even Pfizer's deep pockets could ever induce them to recant their opposing position on
the cholesterol theory of heart disease.
In my view the main reason there is so much contradictory information in the nutrition world stems from the fact that much of modern medical thought has been tainted by
the cholesterol theory of heart disease, which many of us now know is not supported by science.
Not exact matches
However, the main reason the lipid
theory of heart disease continues in the U.S. is because to admit that this hypothesis is wrong is to admit that a whole class
of pharmaceutical drugs is unnecessary, statin drugs that lower one's
cholesterol artificially.
The role
of inflammation and the value
of CRP as a predictor are still very much open to debate, and even supporters
of the inflammation
theory admit that it is unlikely to become more important than
cholesterol.
This
theory is simply not true, as long as the saturates are
of a certain type, and the
cholesterol is not oxidized.
This is the outdated
theory that saturated fat and
cholesterol intake increases
cholesterol levels in the blood, which increase your chance
of heart disease.
Check out these videos on gut bacteria: Stool pH and Colon Cancer Gut Feelings: Probiotics and Mental Health Preventing Ulcerative Colitis with Diet Carnitine, Choline, Cancer and
Cholesterol: The TMAO Connection The Leaky Gut
Theory of Why Animal Products Cause Inflammation
More specifically, controversy continues to surround the
theories that 1) dietary fat, saturated fat, and
cholesterol cause heart disease, obesity, diabetes and cancer and should be replaced in the diet with polyunsaturated vegetable oils; 2) a diet high in carbohydrates will reduce the risk
of chronic disease; and 3) excessive sodium intake is the primary variable in the etiology
of hypertension, a risk factor for heart disease.
Over the past few years, headlines from such studies have led to widespread dismissal
of Dr. McCully's «Homocysteine
Theory of Heart Disease» and renewed media focus on
cholesterol, C - reactive protein and other possible culprits that can be treated by statins and other profitable drugs.
Over the past few years, headlines from such studies have led to widespread dismissal
of Dr. McCully's «Homocysteine
Theory of Heart Disease» and renewed media focus on
cholesterol, c - reactive protein and other possible culprits that can be treated by statins and other profitable drugs.
Still, alternative viewpoints to almost every accepted piece
of data persist thanks to the lost credibility arising from the misstep
of the
cholesterol theory.
there is also this book: The Great
Cholesterol Myth I've read half of the the book, but the theory has been clearly established: basically the main argument of the nutritionist and the cardiologist authors of the book, is that neither dietary cholesterol nor saturated fats will «directly» influence hea
Cholesterol Myth I've read half
of the the book, but the
theory has been clearly established: basically the main argument
of the nutritionist and the cardiologist authors
of the book, is that neither dietary
cholesterol nor saturated fats will «directly» influence hea
cholesterol nor saturated fats will «directly» influence heart disease.
We need to eat more butterfat from pasture - fed animals, more lard from pigs raised outdoors, more eggs from pastured - poultry, and more shrimp and other seafood rich in vitamin D. And we need to recognize the demonization
of butter and similar healthy foods for what it is — a ploy, bolstered by the phony
cholesterol theory, that has convinced Americans to substitute imitation foods for the nourishing foods
of their ancestors.
In a nutshell, the
cholesterol - saturated fat lipid
theory of heart disease is false, and not supported by science.
Clearly something is wrong with the
theories we read in the popular press — and used to bolster sales
of lowfat concoctions and
cholesterol - free foods.
The
theory — called the lipid hypothesis — that there is a direct relationship between the amount
of saturated fat and
cholesterol in the diet and the incidence
of coronary heart disease was proposed by a researcher named Ancel Keys in the late 1950's.
HDL — the good
cholesterol doesn't bear the whole brunt of the journey back a.k.a Reverse Cholesterol Transfer as the original the
cholesterol doesn't bear the whole brunt
of the journey back a.k.a Reverse
Cholesterol Transfer as the original the
Cholesterol Transfer as the original
theory has it.
Many researchers, however, have rejected the saturated - fat - and -
cholesterol theory as a cause
of heart disease, because more than 60 percent
of all heart attacks occur in people with normal
cholesterol levels and the majority
of people with high
cholesterol levels never have heart attacks.
Many researchers, however, have rejected the saturated fat and
cholesterol theory as a cause
of heart disease because more than 60 percent
of all heart attacks occur in people with normal
cholesterol levels and the majority
of people with high
cholesterol levels never have heart attacks.
And as the final lines
of the Telegraph article you cited, said: «To suggest that the
theory relating saturated fat to increased total
cholesterol is flawed, is nonsense, and contradicts 50 years
of evidence - based medicine»
Noakes» opening for his nutrition section includes a quote from George Mann (1993), former professor
of medicine at Vanderbilt University: «The
cholesterol / lipid
theory of heart disease is «the public health diversion
of this century... the greatest scam in the history
of medicine.
In the pharmaceutical world, the lipid
theory of heart disease spawned the most profitable drugs
of all time, statin drugs, designed to artificially lower
cholesterol, a substance needed in our body and without which life would be impossible.
Chemical carcinogens, vitamin supplements, and dietary
cholesterol and saturated fat stem from the «local»
theory of disease
of the 19th century.
Haven't baught any
of his books, but I am interested in his opinions on
cholesterol and fat since there seems to be some strong evidence supporting it and its becoming an increasingly popular
theory.
The authors go on to explain that the lipid
theory of heart disease started by the work
of Ancel Keys in the 1960s led to dietary beliefs that
cholesterol was to be avoided in the diet, and with that belief came the «over-zealous prescription
of cholesterol - reducing medications over the same decades in which there has been a parallel rise in AD prevalence.»
The reason government nutrition advice will not endorse this diet, is because to do so would be to admit that the lipid
theory of disease, that saturated fats cause high
cholesterol which leads to heart disease, is false, and this would destroy several very profitable businesses, including pharmaceutical drugs designed to lower
cholesterol levels (statin drugs).