Sentences with phrase «choose sides in this debate»

Fortunately, you don't have to choose sides in this debate to create a portfolio that reflects your true appetite for risk.

How many bloggers, scientists (especially chemists) question their motives and their preconceptions when choosing sides in debates.

For Twitter, this system has proven to be a problematic one in recent years, often forcing the company to choose sides in debates it'd presumably rather not be a part of.

Not exact matches

Afraid of being branded as moralists, or even worse, proselytizers, politicians cling to surface arguments that remain in the public's comfort zone, choosing sides in the familiar debates on school prayer, pornography, media immorality and abortion.

We encounter it when Christians on one side of a debate accuse those on the other of «picking and choosing» which passages of the Bible they take seriously, when the reality is that we are all selective in our interpretation and application of Scripture.

Now David Cameron's renegotiation has been concluded, MPs are free to choose sides in the referendum debate.

In competitive debates, students do not choose which side they will defend.

For more than a century, American educators and education policymakers have chosen sides in a great debate about the nature and function of American high schools.

Choose one student from each side to explain his / her position and participate in a short debate.

«Having choices helps make that happen, even if it's just choosing the side you'll take in a classroom debate.»

In short, Oreskes (who is not a scientist, of climate or of any other kind) appears to have unilaterally (albeit with, perhaps a little help from her ideological friends) determined that there can be only one side to a «scientific» debate: That which she — in her willful ignorance — has chosen to conjure up and propagatIn short, Oreskes (who is not a scientist, of climate or of any other kind) appears to have unilaterally (albeit with, perhaps a little help from her ideological friends) determined that there can be only one side to a «scientific» debate: That which she — in her willful ignorance — has chosen to conjure up and propagatin her willful ignorance — has chosen to conjure up and propagate.

I would love to see a nationally televised public debate series, held in a neutral venue and moderated by a Moderator acceptable to both sides under strict rules of debate, with each side choosing its participants.

In other words, Irish journalists chose sides just as journalists have chosen sides in the climate debatIn other words, Irish journalists chose sides just as journalists have chosen sides in the climate debatin the climate debate.

I'm kinda surprised that someone who has put great effort in to trying to come across as the great middle ground voice of reason in the climate debate would choose to take sides and jump to assertions about who is right and wrong and who has acted with dignity in this matter.