So, among
Christians the arguement is moot.
Not exact matches
For example — Often used by many
christians as an
arguement for intolerence towards human rights... I pose that every religiously ran nation like that of Iran and Iraq are exactly what the religious in this supposedly tolerent country wish to turn this country into, where science and logically thought are frowned upon and knowledge of fairy tales are rewarded.
We live in a country where just about everything is challenged, and to think that most or many
Christians are not having their faith challenged is a strawman
arguement, I believe.
This is the endless circular
arguement that the
christian apologists engage in.
I'm perplexed at the number of
Christians attacking these people without a full understanding of their
arguement (how many have actually listened to the logic) and using only a single scripture they obviously do nt fully understand as the basis of their whole
arguement.