How can
the church accept an idea or practice which it had earlier condemned?
Not exact matches
Finally, the Maryknoll religious says, while the
church perhaps did not approve the Crusades, the two world wars, the Korean war, or today's Vietnam war, the fact that it did not condemn them «shows that it
accepts the
idea that there can be a just war, and that men might sometimes be right in taking up arms to defend themselves.»
If this positive view of celibacy is conveyed, «then we shall see the most distinguished among the younger generation fired up with the inspiration to feed the flock of God... and their deep hearts will grasp the whole
idea of the
Church and
accept it into themselves as a living power» (p73).
Today, however, her faithful members are asked whether they truly love the
Church,
accepting the change even though it appears strange at first, or whether by their secret or public protest they show that they have not really loved the
Church herself, but only their
idea of her.
Protestantism
accepted the
idea that uniformity of belief is a necessary factor in a
church, so that as new formulations of belief have arisen new
churches have been founded to represent them, until in the United States we have over two hundred different kinds of Protestant Christians.
But a theologian may not
accept this presupposition from the beginning, or he may try to eliminate it implicitly or explicitly by demand - ing that the
Church should revise her faith or her
idea of herself according to his theological opinion or that she should
accept the latter as of equal right.
and to say a roman emporer is responsible for the modern Bible shows you have no
idea of the history of the Bible... we have a list of almost ALL the NT that was ALREADY
accepted widely by the
church in 150 AD!
I will certainly be using the
ideas where there are no barriers or hurdles to jump to be
accepted into the
Church.
Although many
churches refused to
accept the sculpture because they didn't agree that Jesus was a homeless person, Rev Alistair Duncan from St Georges Tron told Premier the
church welcomed the
idea with open arms.
Imagine what a blessing it would be for the
Church, were a large and vital group of reformed Catholic traditionalists — freed from harmful
ideas and fully
accepting Vatican II (rightly interpreted) and the Novus Ordo — were to fully reconcile with the
Church, and not do anything to betray the Vatican's good faith, once re-united.
We
accept without special difficulty the
idea that the
Church was the visible efficacious sign of salvation for past ages anterior to Christ and the
Church, when salvation had not yet appeared ecclesiastically although it was salvation from the
Church.
In the 17th century, the
ideas of the Reformation were spreading throughout the world and the
Church did not
accept very graciously the new scientific
ideas that mixed themselves with God and religion.
I agree to take this test or at least research the
idea, for the glory of God, and I will not
accept the payment for money, I will donate it to the charity or
church of my choice.
the
idea of the pre-existence of Christ was
accepted not only by Paul himself but also by the
churches generally.
Both in thinking of the context in which we work in the
Church and of the goal we pursue, it seems easy to
accept and propagate the
idea that the last reality with which we are concerned is the
Church itself, and that the summary commandment we obey is to love Christianity with heart, soul, mind and strength.
We have a natural revulsion to the
idea of checking people's BMI before
accepting them into the
Church, especially when obesity is not necessarily reflective of gluttony (often, in this country, it is a result of poverty), and when we know from our own experiences or the experiences of those we love that an unhealthy weight can result from a variety of factors — from genetics to psychological components — and when some of our favorite people in the world (or when we ourselves) wrestle with a complicated relationship with food, whether it's through overeating or under - eating.
Didn't read the article, so I have no
idea how President Obama's faith has been labeled, but as a person who began attending a Christina
Church during adolescence, I know that it is very hard to
accept a number of tenets of the faith, so I find myself doubting that a person who was raised for a number of years in a Muslim household and whose mother does not appear to have been of a Christian denomination, is likely to have adopted the tenets of the Christian faith.
I believe a lot of questionable doctrinal
ideas also slipped in — with very little scriptural open - ness on the questions — you
accept the doctrines or you leave the
church.
The
church lost when it
accepted from the Enlightenment a reinforcement of the
idea that God made the world and left it to follow its own laws.
Christian moral thinking has
accepted this and has given marriage a special blessing, surrounding it with the aura of divine approval even if it has not always realistically grasped the fact that marriage is not inevitably an ideal state and that to insist on its continuance when love is absent is to condone what in effect is legalized rape and hence hardly an appropriate symbol for the Christian
idea of marriage as representing «the mystical union of Christ and his
Church.»
I don't know the history really well, but I'm pretty sure martin luther had a much bigger problem with the
church accepting money for people to «get out of purgatory faster» and with the
idea that saying 10 «Hail Mary's» gets people forgiven than he ever had with the act of confessing.
Such an
idea contradicts the constant practice of the
Church in which subsequent teachings of Popes, Councils and the Catechism reiterate, sometimes using different words and expressions, prior non-infallible teachings of Popes (in encyclicals) and other documents to be
accepted and authoritatively binding at the appropriate level.
Jedi groups have struck back against a Scottish
church who called the
idea of a legally
accepted Jedi wedding «completely nonsensical».
Here in the UK warmist
ideas are unquestioningly
accepted, and carelessly promulgated, by every major political party, scientific and cultural institution,
church, charity, university, school, trade union, local authority, NGO, and even, universally, by big business (with the energy companies and even the oil companies towing the line).