Sentences with phrase «church and state so»

This would include, for example, a separation of church and state so that the Head of State was not also Head of the Church of England and an end to Bishops sitting as of right in the House of Lords.

I want a separation of church and state so that noone tells me how to worship.

If you are a Democrat you don't worry about such things because you believe in separation of church and state so it is not the government's business what you think.

It also was founded on the ideal of the separation of church and state so others could not force their religious views on others.

Not exact matches

As a pastor, Young's income «was all over the place,» he says, and so were the gigs — he was constantly moving his family to a different town or state with every new church.

So, I think we have all forgotten that this country was created with the intention of having seperation of church and state.

Because this feuding annoyed our key founders so greatly, they made it a top priority to establish the separation of church and state (and to make it Amendment # 1 of our Constitution).

So I guess separation of church and state does not apply as long as church goes along with public opinion.

This country was founded on a belief in god, the whole premise of separation of church and state was apart of the formation of this nation so that we would never have the problem they encountered in England, that the head of the Church being able to make changes in the Nchurch and state was apart of the formation of this nation so that we would never have the problem they encountered in England, that the head of the Church being able to make changes in the NChurch being able to make changes in the Nation.

For a country with supposed separation of church and state, I've never seen so much religious interference in politics in my life...

We are free to believe in anything we want in our private homes and in our churches and there is a separation of church and state was created so one religion can not have power to say what's moral and who can and can't prey.

The LDS church did not grant the priesthood to blacks in the early days of the church, mainly because they were already under so much persecution, having to flee from state to state and finally into Utah territory that the additional trouble granting this authority to blacks would have caused might have sunk the early church.

The so - called Sep of Church and State works BOTH ways.

So that we may accomplish this task, God has established three estates, in which all people exist and find their roles: state, church, and family.

I doubt that you would be so cavalier about separation of church and state.

Also i want to add is aren't church and state (Gov «t) separated in U.s. so its up to the gov» t what happens to Gays & Lesbians not the church.

This is why a level of separation between Church and state is so essential.

So those Christians who are so eager to break down the wall of separation between church and state would be well - adivsed to rethink their positionSo those Christians who are so eager to break down the wall of separation between church and state would be well - adivsed to rethink their positionso eager to break down the wall of separation between church and state would be well - adivsed to rethink their positions.

The Penn State matter and the Catholic Church (neither of which have I any reason to champion) parallel eachother so superficially that only someone ignorant about both could think them worth comparing.

It should be noted that the Church, as far as it is able to do so, resists both tyrannies of the state and of the individual.

Our country has survived in large part due to the seperation of church and state, and I find it appalling that so many national leaders are using it as a wedge between Americans.

Ultimately, the Church's limitation of the state depends on our ability to recover a genuine understanding of the Church's true nature and to regard ourselves not simply as a so - called intermediate association within the state and civil society but as the true whole, the heavenly city, that precedes and transcends them.

The designers of the Const * itution were brilliant and knew how important it was for future generations to not view their country as one based on Christianity, but as one based simply on freedom, and so they were very careful to put their own religious views aside and make a strong point with separation of church and state.

due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing, marriage isn't a religious thing it is a civil rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their civil rights to equal treatment under the law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to deny you your rights under the law.

We easily regard as the defeat and regression of the Church in modern times what is actually only the social manifestation of a state which has always existed, even in the so - called good old days, because even then people, on the average, had but little faith, hope and love of God and men.

Why, then, was the country so quick to embrace, often with religious fervor, the notion that separation of church and state is a necessary precondition of religious liberty?

Young women have so much to offer the Church but we are largely overlooked, and that is, simply stated, an inefficient use of the Kingdom's assets.

Portraying religious dissenters as favoring separation was an effective, if disingenuous, rhetorical tactic because it was so widely accepted by Americans that church and state occupied cooperative relationships.

So where is the separation of church and state for your beloved president?

Even so, it is true that many Protestant reformers considered the right balance of the relations between church and state to be of first importance in....

So, although those apostate Churches were still advising the State, they had rejected the Word of God and become false prophets crying «peace, peace.»

The pastor states the church grows and the devil inevitably is there, so to eliminate the devil, eliminate your lame excuse for a church.

There is a basic incompatibility between Islam's belief in all encompassing doctrines that embrace religion, private and public life and the American principles of liberty of belief and speech and the absolute separation of state and church affairs For Americans belief is a private matter, not so for Islam, where theocracy rules over all human affairs.

Even my very conservative Roman Catholic brother gave me kudos when I said that if nothing else, as a Baptist, my two cherished beliefs were in soul liberty and seperation of church and state... so, if god was there and I was completly wrong not to believe in him, then at least he knew every step of my journey, and in the end my salvation, or lack of it, was between me and god.

And so they routinely violate the principle of separation of church and state to get their beliefs imposed on all of And so they routinely violate the principle of separation of church and state to get their beliefs imposed on all of and state to get their beliefs imposed on all of us.

This hypothesis would explain why he so strongly establishes separation of church and state in his policy.

However, with the doctrine of the separation of church and state, the West found itself having to deal with death, but unable completely to do so within the limited discourse of military force and the public will.

Shaw argues that the present struggles of the Church to be who she is amid governmental mandates and the ascendant «state religion» of secular humanism are the legacy of Baltimore's Cardinal James Gibbons and other early churchmen who found America to be so accommodating to religion as to warrant a reciprocal accommodation to nationalism.

While I value historical roots and the search for answers within the church's rich past, I wonder why, in contemporary Orthodoxy in the United States, those answers are so easy to come by.

That is somewhat promising — it hopefully means that 58 % don't really care — and rightfully so, with that little thing called separation of church and state.

The fact that she immigrated from the Soviet Union where there was an orthodox and corrupted church to the United States where the dominant strain of Christianity is Protestant is the real reason her philosophy contrasts so greatly with Christian Religion.

Hitler tried to use churches for his own purposes, and because religion in its institutional forms can be so vulnerable to state pressures, the religious involvement in providing a counterbalancing force to political structures and armies may take entirely new forms in the future.

That, however, is not so easy to do when for centuries the church has followed policies (not unwittingly, as the Fuller professors state, but systematically and by unholy design) that sought to de-Judaize the Jews and submerge them in various brands of Christendom.

«Let us not forget,» wrote Nietzsche, «in the end what a Church is, and especially in contrast to every «state»: a Church is above all an authoritative organization which secures to the most spiritual men the highest rank, and believes in the power of spirituality so far as to forbid all grosser appliances of authority.

This is why the Irish clergy are often so timid about proclaiming Christian doctrine: they know well that people like them personally and that they are grateful for the social work done by the Church, but that Church teaching is deeply resented, and that any attempt to state it is met with bitter hostility.

The «absolutists» separationizing of «church and state» may well be but a state proclamation and if so then our nation's Federalistic Republicanism might just supercede our wantonness to mix Christendom with Federalist Policies.

Jefferson knew that every state in the Union (except Rhode Island) had a state sponsored religion since before the days of the Revolution, so by relegating himself to the settled national issue, he could not easily be accused of more atheist sentiments.So, what does this mean to the issue of «separation of church and state» for today's argument?

The «absolutists» separationizing of «church and state» may well be but a state proclamation and if so then our nation's Federalistic Republicanism might just supercede our wantonness to (NOT) mix Christendom with Federalist (REPUBLIC) Policies.

The «absolutists» separationizing of «church and state» may well be but a state proclamation and if so then our nation's Federalistic Republicanism might just supercede our wantonness to (NOT) mix Christendom with Federalist Policies.

So the Roman hierarchy feared the growth of the Church and they thought that if they would not control the growth, the supremacy of the Roman emperor would be no more and pope would become the monarch of the state as well as the Church.