Likewise, these associations have begun to recognize that no matter how good a counselor one may be, it is the ordaining body that must determine one's legitimacy as a minister of
that church in a particular setting.
Not exact matches
After lunch, Father Ed settles down to talk to me about his remarkable spiritual journey to the Ordinariate — the structure
set up by Pope Benedict to allow former Anglicans to become Catholics, bringing with them some of their Anglican traditions — and about what he sees as its
particular mission, to revive authentic, English spirituality
in the Catholic
Church.
All this means that the
Church will often have conflicting understandings of what it means to live as God's people
in a
particular location or cultural
setting.
The difference
in settings is important because the
Church faced the task of taking the words of Jesus to a
particular audience and presenting them as the word of the Lord
in a new situation.2 It took both wisdom and courage for the
Church to assume this awesome burden of interpreting, but to have failed to do so out of an overwhelming reverence for quotations from Jesus would have ended the work Jesus began.
If with this we associate the usual «catholic» view that a priest is especially assigned the responsibility of administering the sacraments of the
Church and
in particular the celebration of the Eucharist, we have a proper
setting or context for the labor of proclamation.
Those who hear,
in the
setting of the
Church's corporate worship, are summoned, upon each
particular occasion, to place themselves within the history which is God's revelation, at the point where it culminates
in Jesus Christ, and to lay themselves open to the Word of judgement and of renewal which is spoken there to every human being.
If it is granted that there is no theological or institutional way to guarantee that
church and ministry will not fall into ideological captivity, should not a theological picture of ministry more powerfully include ways
in which the ultimate purpose of ministry can and must
set it
in tension with the concrete actuality of a
particular church community at a
particular time?
Our students and those laypeople tried to understand what that
church's own task should be
in that
particular setting — and of course the
setting was black.
The «ex-gay» approach was the topic of our second discussion around Torn, and as I said there, I think this may be the most difficult reality for the
Church, and evangelicals
in particular, to accept — that we have to move beyond the default
setting of trying to change people's sexual orientation upon learning they are gay.
A free - for - all bloodbath
set in a Kentucky
church is a
particular marvel of choreography and spatial geometry
set, cunningly, to the guitar solo from Lynyrd Skynyrd's «Free Bird.»
For this reason, where a
church or religious body asserts, because of its ethos, that religious belief constitutes a genuine occupational requirement for employment, it must at least «be possible for such an assertion to be the subject, if need be, of effective judicial review by which it can be ensured that the criteria
set out
in Article 4 (2) of that directive are satisfied
in the
particular case.»