I believe the Catholic
church is wrong on this policy.
Not exact matches
Even if you believe God
is vanishingly unlikely to exist, the consequence of
being wrong (Hell)
is so great, and the benefits of
being right (not having to go to
church on Sundays) so comparatively miniscule, that you should probably just believe in God to
be on the safe side.
Bottom line
is this, keep it out of the public square; learn to respect others beliefs / disbeliefs; stop trying to tell LGBT they
are wrong; stop trying to tell women what they can and can't do with their bodies; stop trying to push bogus creationism crap (backed with zero evidence)
on innocent children in the public school system; just stop pushing it outside your home or
church.
This religious event
being placed
on - base
is wrong and a horrible violation of the separation of
church and state.
You
on the other hand Angela couldn't
be more
wrong about Joseph Smith and the early members of the
church.
Lets not focus
on what the
church is doing right or
wrong, and lets focus
on what we
are doing right or
wrong in our own actions.
The weather
is getting nice... what would
be wrong with making sandwiches after
church and going out
on the street to feed the homeless?
But whether the head of the Standing Commission
on Evangelism
is strategically right or
wrong, the more interesting development
is the increasingly explicit doctrine that the Episcopal
Church is a non-doctrinal communion.
Since 2005, I just could not put a finger
on why I had the feeling that there
was something
wrong with my
church.
When you live in a society where there
is a high value placed
on calling yourself Christian and going to
church, and there
are even promising career paths available, there
's always going to
be people who become Christians for the
wrong reasons.
I wonder what Miss Morality
is going to do when they start telling her that her bisexuality
is immoral and
wrong, and her gay - rights activism
is immoral and
wrong, and her use and activism for contraception
is immoral and
wrong, and her stances
on religious freedom
are immoral and
wrong, and her notions that the
Church should welcome critical thinking and demands for evidence
are immoral and
wrong?
It all could have
been pretty much ignored until mustard seed decided to defend him... I will reserve my feelings about that... I
was able to discern just who / what they
were... he basically a non
church goer who thinks he knows everything about
church and she a whiner that can't see that just because it
was time to move
on it wasn't necessary that someone
be in the
wrong.
there
are thousands upon thousands of lbgt that attend
church or some form of religious sermon, so
wrong on that point.
Let us
be clear, according to Vines, the tradition and reliability of the
Church's teaching throughout the ages
on sexuality
are both
wrong.
Those who still think it
is funny to think that the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints still carries
on the Polygamy views
are so
wrong.
Even if you don't specifically believe in God or go to
church every sunday, there
is nothing
wrong in believing in some kind of «greater
being» that you can rely
on and that will guide you down the right path.
At the same time, it
was clear that, for all their
wrong - headed and occasionally malicious attacks
on the
Church, these ladies
were giving voice to something which
was also generally felt within society and particularly by younger women who knew nothing of the Network or its antics but who
were not comfortable with answering the
Church's critics.
Too many corners of the
Church have
been infected with a legalistic, performance - based view of God in which God stands over our lives with crossed arms and a disappointed scowl, applauding only when we get everything just right and rendering judgment
on everything we do
wrong.
Brian and Alden... let's not forget that the early
church believed in the imminent return of the Lord... it appears somebody
was wrong... how wd that belief affect the message
on what
was to
be accepted as the gospel in the interim?
He felt that the
church should speak out
on vital issues, even chancing that it may
be wrong.
Those Christians who have come before us may have
been wrong about some things, he notes, but «every key figure in the history of the
church has left his, her or its mark
on subsequent readings of scripture.»
I appreciate it would
be wrong to turn a blind eye to all the bad and not so good things the
Church does, the
wrong behaviour in the name of Jesus, but why oh why do you guys
on these blogs continually go
on and
on about them.
I thought straight away this
is a joke as scriptures tell us only the father knows the time of his sons return and hes keeping it to himself he hasnt even told his son yet.Mark 13:32 This a mystery isnt God all knowing and isnt Jesus God it
is a mystery.Yet I like that that
is the case because it proves that the father
is not the son and the son
is not the father they
are separate yet they
are one just like the holy spirit.I have come across denominations that believe the father son and holy spirit
are the one person i asked them how they can say that when Jesus
was baptized we see 3 separate persons.We have enough information to know that we
are in the last days the signs
are present and increasing.Ever since Israel became a nation the countdown has begun.The verse the enemy will come like a thief in the night i have heard preached many times and i believe the preachers have got it
wrong because they preach it from the view for the
church to get there act together or you will miss out.This view
is incorrect because if you
are a born again believer following him in obedience and relying
on the holy spirit you
are not walking in darkness but
are walking in the light so you will not
be caught unaware as those who
are sleeping this
is a warning for those who
are sleeping or walking according to the flesh they
are in darkness.Remember the 10 wise virgins the ones who
were alert and keep refilling there lamps went in with the bride those who slept
were left behind and so it will
be when the Lord returns.Now
is the time to prepare our hearts and lives to
be ready for his return.It
is an exciting time to
be living and we
are to live in the expectation that the Lord could return at any time brentnz
This discussion seems to have moved from a discussion
on 1 Corinthians 9 (which could
be used in a
wrong way) to the issue of whether those lead a
church should
be paid so I offer the above thoughts to restore some balance.
«I've said many times in black
churches that the black
church is on the
wrong side of history
on this.
Harold Camping KNOWS without a shadow of a doubt that Jesus
is coming
on Saturday, just like I know that the Mormon faith
was the only true
church... well he will
be wrong on saturday... will Mormons ever admit they
are wrong even if Jesus never comes?
I hope that they
are wrong and the get smaller and keep
on getting smaller, Until they face reality, that
church is doomed.
He took a long look at the room of would -
be pastors and ministerial leaders, each of us zealous to earn our future roles in
churches, ministries and
on the mission field and delivered his first teaching point: «The
wrong person at the
wrong place at the
wrong time always results in the
wrong thing happening.»
That fellow voted for the
wrong guy in the last election, he cheats
on his wife,
is dishonest in business, drinks like a fish, doesn't go to
church, has crazy religious ideas, and his neighbor tells me he may
be gay!
That
is, all the
wrong ways people have of thinking about
church center
on something other than Jesus (buildings, times, groups).
On the question of taking a human life, for example, the
church has always distinguished between killing and murder, murder
being the morally condemned act, and killing the physical act which
is not always
wrong.
Martin Luther presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible
is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity
is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it
is correct which
is why the bible itself says that the
CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this tea
CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the
church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this tea
church existed before even the bible
was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely
on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth
is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to
be absolute which
is why the
church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this tea
church is said to
be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what
is that one
church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this tea
church... The
church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this tea
church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the
church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this tea
church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats
wrong with this teaching.
Within the traditional understanding of the teaching function of the
church, it
is possible for authoritative noninfallible teaching
on specific moral issues to
be wrong.
Are they having trouble agreeing
on where the Catholic
church is wrong?
When the Catholic
church is evolving with the world faster than your ideas... You
are probably
on the
wrong side of history...
They believe that such language
is defined by the categories of the Enlightenment, that there
are different ways of reasoning, and that the
church must make its claims to truth
on a contested field without shouting in advance that others
are wrong and it alone
is right.
Where
was I
wrong, in my original post, about the teachings of the
church on gay marriage.
The Christian community can
be wrong in its interpretation of Scripture, as the
church's former position
on slavery indicates.
This
is wrong for example I would never stoop down to lying, cheating and thieving life style of televangelists or mega
church pastors (I would
be happy to provide a long list of examples
on request)
Are your own inclinations so wayward and
wrong that you continually have to hear an opposing message repeated over and over again to get you back
on the
church's track?
The author
is Archbishop Charles Chaput of Denver, the publisher
is Doubleday, and the price should
be no obstacle to a book that offers a fresh analysis of what has gone
wrong with the
Church in America, a convincing case for encouragement, wise counsel
on how to engage the public square and, not incidentally, restored confidence in the ability of (some) bishops to teach
on faith and morals.
Maybe it
's because I imagine, someday, likely today, the
Church will look at me, with disdain
on their faces and parody Twitter accounts and coffeeshops and doctoral dissertations
on all the ways I did it
wrong, and all I'll know how to say
is that I know, and I
'm sorry, I hope I learned to
be kind.
Just to get the comments started, if my definition
is correct, what, if anything,
is wrong with the four men who «go to
church»
on the golf course?
i can feel love for him throughout my heart and soul... i want to grow old with this man... i
am 47 and he
is 45... he has never
been married... he said there
is not a chance of getting back together again regardless of how we feel towards each other because we committed adultery and God will never forgive us and it will
be wrong to do so... so
am i supposed to go
on living my life
being so deeply in love with this man i can never have... why would God put him in my life to make me feel so spiritually happy, so wonderful, so at peace with myself and someone I can finally worship Him with just to take him away from me... I've never
been with someone who
was so religious and i thought this
was it... i finally have someone to read the bible with and go to
church with and put God first and share things with my self and my daughter as a loving relationship would
be....
It will also imply that initiatives in Ecumenism of minimising doctrinal meanings and differences
are on the
wrong lines and
are hindering the meaning of the Holy Spirit in asking Ecumenism of the
Church.
Obviously you don't care about the Mormon
church so you should have no comments when yours
are based not
on fact but
on opinion that
is misguided and absolutely
wrong.
In my opinion what
is wrong with the western
church is that it has failed to stay centered
on its purpose, that
being to edify the believer.
I think most of the Americans
are in lost... as most of them do not know who their father
is and it
is very unfortunate... even if they know who their father
is, the mom has children from diff men outside of marriage... and while a child
is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back early nineteen century, women
were not allowed to go to beach without
being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can
be listed... And then you go to
Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front of the
Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending of both hand... some of the status
are blank, white, Spanish and so
on... so they
are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number of young American turns to Atheism or believing there
is no God and so
on... Its hard to assume where these nations
are going with the name of modernization... nothing
wrong having scientists discovered the cure of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl
are becoming so much slave of material things...
I imagine they
were trying to get all the
church - goers as they left for
church, because the book
was called National Sunday Law and
was about why it
is wrong for Christians to worship in
church on Sunday rather than Saturday.
I still have thoughts and feelings for the families of those killed in the
church in South Carolina including the pastor, and I
am not quire ready to move
on to business as usual with talk of
wrong being done by pastors and «sheeple» enabling it.