Instead of displaying wisdom in spending, shrewdness in planning, and generosity in giving,
church leaders often succumb to the spending values of this world.
John Ortberg, author of Soul Keeping and senior pastor of Menlo Church in Northern California, encourages burnt - out believers first by validating what
some church leaders often leave unspoken.
In the past decade
church leaders often voiced cynicism or even a sense of futility about involving local churches in social action.
Other
church leaders often helped to identify or affirm the gifts in others.
Not exact matches
Ben Rogers, East Asia Team
Leader at advocacy charity Christian Solidarity Worldwide, told Premier: «The Islamic Defenders Front, they for years have been pushing this agenda, trying to shut down
churches, attack the Ahmadiyya community - who're a sect of Islam that other Muslims disagree with - and also
often raided nightclubs and bars and want Sharia law to be established.
The
leaders of the Mormon
Church / «Cult» are not paid is
often heard from the Mormon peons which somehow makes these
leaders good men.
Church leader and theologian Steve Holmes wrote: «I agree profoundly with Steve in his concern that our pastoral practice in this area has
often been appalling, and needs to change... his diagnosis of a real and urgent problem is spot on... [He] names a pastoral scandal that we have swept under the carpet for too long.»
Church leaders maintained informal,
often friendly, contacts with religious dissidents.
Their hospitals have not attempted to be at the forefront in treating it, and indeed some in Africa have been cavalier in their use of untested blood for transfusions; American members who have contracted the disease have
often been shunned; and African
church leaders have assumed that AIDS is not an issue affecting Adventists.
The
leaders often didn't consult the area
churches,
leaders, or believers.
There are numerous avenues by which this idea is presented in
church settings, but most
often it revolves around the idea that we serve a powerful God, and God has dispensed some of that power upon all believers, but especially the
leaders of the
church by giving them wisdom, vision, and special spiritual gifts.
I've
often been asked to speak to
leaders of mainline
churches on the topic of young people leaving the
church.
Despite having one foot in Generation X, I tend to identify most strongly with the attitudes and the ethos of the millennial generation, and because of this, I'm
often asked to speak to my fellow evangelical
leaders about why millennials are leaving the
church.
The psychic energy of contemporary pastors, theologians and
church leaders has more
often centered on the kerygmatic Word as it encounters «the problem of history,» on struggles against the idolatries of fascism and Stalinism abroad and racism, classism and sexism at home, or on the development of the professional skills of ministry.
You will learn more about young adults, understand some of the many reasons they leave the
church and
often stay away, network with other
leaders in your area and walk away with some do - able next steps and encouragement for your ministry.
How
often does this happen among the
leaders of
churches in the Willow Creek Association?
Early
Church leaders wrote about persecution: «The
oftener we are mown down by you, the more in number we grow; the blood of Christians is seed» for the growth of God's people.
I
often wonder if the
leaders of the
church would set a budget without their salaries included and without telling the congregation trust that enough was given to meet their needs.
Church leaders» efforts to attack the scourge of degeneracy, feeblemindedness and poverty ran parallel to and
often joined forces with the work of the American Eugenics Society.
As I've shared before, I've been on both sides and can honestly say that
often leadership abuse is not intentional, but rather the fruit of a very unhealthy way of seeing the role of a
leader — whether in the home, business, or
church.
In my experience and observation,
often when an organization,
church, or
leader gets accused of being abusive, rather than offering a genuine apology, a kind...
As
church leaders, while it is
often a good idea to make plans, I think we sometimes get derailed from God's vision for our lives by naysayers and setbacks.
But second, in those days the
leaders of the
church were
often the ones who administered the medicine.
The KGB archives, opened fleetingly after the collapse of the Soviet Union, proved what many Russians had known but few in the West had believed: that the
leaders of the Russian Orthodox
Church were
often forced to carry out the specific instructions of the more nefarious organs of state.
In their early days, when the Emergent
Church was vying with the new Calvinism for pole position in the American evangelical world, they launched regular, and
often very thorough, critiques of the Emergent
leaders.
However,
leaders in the early
church would
often combine practices of believers from various backgrounds (early Christians were a mixture of former Jews and pagans).
So when one Christian accuses a
church leader of doing something evil or wrong, the pastor
often feels justified in retorting the same way Jesus did, and accuses his accusers of committing a sin against the Holy Spirit.
A second group of
leaders and
churches (which do not practice these things)
often accuse the first group of doing these miracles in the power of the devil rather than in the power of God.
«To the
church leaders — who are
often as burnt out as the people we're trying to serve,» Ortberg says.
The shame and guilt can
often be compounded when the abuse occurred in a
church setting or was perpetrated by a
church leader.
It's just another example of
church leaders, priests, who are entitled, and if caught are
often granted special favors, leniencies, and even exonerations.
Neville I forgot to mention that paid
church leaders are expected to do all the heavy lifting in my experience and
often it can be inward looking.
Church activities depending upon volunteers tend to be spasmodic and
often dependent on self - formed leadership, so that parishes are increasingly seeking to appoint people to full - time pastoral roles to coordinate catechetical and evangelising initiatives and to form volunteer
leaders and teams.
I believe that while God wants the
church to lead the world in bringing out cultural change and redemption, the
church is too
often resistant to change, and so God turns to culture to be the primary
leader of the change He wants to see, that's why some
churches at City Central are always looking for a change, and to improve and make people improve.
In the first place, the
leaders of the
church have been induced to listen very closely to the social scientists and sociologists, and thus they have adopted programs and ideas of social planning which, worthy as they may be, can
often be recognized only with difficulty as the real concern of the
church.
Men and women in the secular media
often are more sensitive to the needs and the issues of the world than are
church leaders.
While this may well reflect christological controversies in the early
church, it may also indicate Jesus» resistance to the title
often given him and to the interpretation of the Messiah as military
leader that was implicit in it.
Even after SGM has appealed to the First Amendment to avoid an investigation into the matter, Challies and many evangelical
leaders with ties to SGM have either remained silent about the lawsuit or defended SGM,
often characterizing those who have come forward with concerns about abuse as «divisive» or «sowing disunity and strife» in the
Church.
And even though Christians seem fragmented and disassociated from each other at times, the
Church and its
leaders have
often set examples of peace, hope and unity.
I
often share with
church leaders that the Gospel - centered response to abuse by the institution is one that demonstrates transparency, vulnerability, and sacrifice.
Secondly, if Christian
leaders use the concepts of the new ethic without explicitly clarifying what distinguishes them from the social doctrine of the
Church and from the gospel, as is
often the case, the faithful will be at a loss and will tend not to discern the difference.
But so
often church leaders think they know what that should look like in every single person's life.
«I
often say to Christian
leaders, «listen, you're in every community, whether you meet in a pub or at home or a building or a school - the
Church is there».
The Vatican's
churches in the country aren't recognised by the state and
leaders and worshippers
often face discrimination.
Pastors and
church leaders informed by this theology are
often very good at working forward from these touchstones to specific courses of action.
Reading all of these people's comments gives one an image of a great tide of humanity washing in and out of an institution that does not have the rigid membership boundaries
often perceived by
church leaders who look at the
church from the inside out (and who are responsible for keeping the statistics).
I'm fully with David in that I want people to seek the revelation of God in their lives, and not to be dictated to by a
church leader who, let's face it,
often has a lot to loose if people don't by into their vision from God.
The pastor and elders and
leaders of the
church or organization
often serve as the gatekeepers in such situations, welcoming those who belong while admonishing those who don't to «change their ways.»
How
often we are still tempted to bring influence to bear upon secular powers by calling on the
church to speak with some kind of authority through its
leaders and councils.
Within the field in which I am working — race relations in the United States — I am well aware that
church leaders have continually stood up for the righteous cause and have
often persuaded their
churches when they meet in assembly to express themselves for principles along the same line, even when that course was not always popular.