Other
church leaders think the press should be chiefly a service center for the denomination, producing materials closely matched to denominational program priorities and specifically designed for use in the denomination's congregations.
As
church leaders I think that it is very important for us to be prepared to be transparent and to let people understand that we struggle with our theology.
But so often
church leaders think they know what that should look like in every single person's life.
When many parents, pastors, and
church leaders think of young people, «leadership» is probably not the first word.
If he was truly divine, having a wife doesn't change that — he isn't less holy just because he had intercourse, no matter what our puritanical
church leaders think.
What saddens me is that
church leaders think that people who «leave their church» are forsaking Jesus, abandoning the church, and living in rebellion against God.
Perhaps
church leaders thought the legislation adequately shielded all the LDS church's functions and ministries from the purview of the new law.
Some years ago, when Episcopal
Church leaders thought they were experiencing a communications problem, an elaborate plan for consultation with diocesan decision - making bodies was undertaken.
Not exact matches
I fear many Catholic
leaders, including the pope, perhaps,
think they can forge a concordat with the sexual revolution that won't damage the
Church's witness to the Gospel.
The reason I left my last
church started with a conversation this with a female
leader (and it is important I
think that I mention she was female in the light of this conversation).
The
leaders hide
church history from its members, when we find it, we take it to them, and of course are called aposates, there are so many mental systems in place at every level to control the people and there
thoughts and actions, at a very young age.
In a nutshell, Mormons don't
think independently and the
church leaders have a tremendous amount of control over their members.
@alientech — I suppose you
think that the
churches,
leaders of business and such will just automatically all head towards altruism on their own then?
I
think I understand some of our Lord's heart, when He must remove the strong
leader to ensure His
church blossoms.
And it will be for me quite a poignant moment going there [to Whitehall] with the other
church leaders and the Queen and all the others to
think of him.
Back in the 80s I
think it was, when there was a war going on between the fundamentalist wing of the
church and those who were merely conservative (and the few who were moderate), one of the fundamentalist
leaders gave a speech or sermon in which he said, «If the Southern Baptist Convention votes that pickles are divine, then the professors at our seminaries had better start teaching that indeed pickles are divine.»
You would
think that
church leaders would be thanking people for jerking it, since it prevents the things they hate most: premarital relations, abortions and divorce.
The
leader of the
church could care less what the lay
think.
Andy Peck asked ten Christian
leaders what they
think the UK
church would look like in 2020.
If we don't speak — if our
church leaders don't speak — we'll be absorbed into our culture's way of
thinking, and our children will be catechized by progressive creeds of sexual liberation.
Thinking about cancelling the
church service is terrifying to most
church leaders because we depend on the people to fill the pews and pay the bills, one of which is our own salary.
Given these results, why is separationism still the dominant position of many civil libertarians, including most Jewish and mainline Protestant
leaders in the field of
church - state
thought?
Some Christians
think Jesus is leading them to leave the
church they are in so they can go to seminary and become a pastor or
church leader.
I have not read the book — my
church is already living through enough spiritual abuse on the part of its
leaders that I really don't
think I can stomach any more!
The real sad thing is that over 4,000 former members and
leaders of this
church are now directly affected and suffering because one bully used his pulpit to twist theology to his way of
thinking.
I can say that even though I was not a
leader in a
church, my pride and self righteousness led me to
think that I was above sinning.
I
think that is a valid and important question for the
church and its
leaders.
While I
think Viola is mostly talking about
churches that aren't necessarily abusive, my experience was that you're even more likely to be boiled in oil if you dare to speak out about
church leaders who engage in bullying and / or abuse.
And I
think, going forward, they're going to be looking to Fox News or John Oliver or
church leaders.
I
think what scares people most is «
Church without a
leader» What would happen if most pastor's just walked away unannounced and never came back?
«In any battle, you've got to be clued up about what you're doing,» explains Lindsay, when I catch up with him a week later to talk in more depth, «so I
think we need to train
churches —
church leaders, youth pastors — anyone engaging with youth culture, about what is actually going on... We can't be naïve about this stuff.»
I do not
think that the
leaders of the
Churches are really wholly devoted to the cause of ecumenism.
Planning the
church budget in this way really makes
church leaders and elders
think twice about where they spend their money, and whether or not it is really necessary to pave the parking lot or upgrade the sound system.
The problem for Bell is that many of those same people
think he's been moving in the «wrong direction», and
church leaders are now wary of endorsing anything by him.
David, I'll buy your statement «I don't
think the
church NEEDS
leaders» if you can promise me that the leaderless
church will not have any manipulators «from below».
Do you honestly
think — and someone please answer me — by changing the name from «
leader» to «elder» will change the climate in your
church?
Since the 1970s, the conservative
churches have been in the ascendancy, and their
leaders understandably
think that it is their turn to try to frame the moral challenges for the society.
Church leaders are deluded if they think people are desperately seeking a «community» and will attend church in hopes of findi
Church leaders are deluded if they
think people are desperately seeking a «community» and will attend
church in hopes of findi
church in hopes of finding it.
I don't
think the
church NEEDS
leaders, and maybe shouldn't have them, in our present understanding of the word.
I
think that it's not always easy to agree with the Catholic
church's teachings at times, but I believe that Dolan will be a strong leader and positive force in the C
church's teachings at times, but I believe that Dolan will be a strong
leader and positive force in the
ChurchChurch.
Among the disciples of Jesus and in the early
church there were spiritual
leaders who
thought of themselves in such a manner.
We need to
think about new models of organization which are not so bishop or rector centered and which support and enhance the clergy role as spiritual
leaders within the
Church and which call all the members to a new sense of discipleship.
We need our (supposedly) Bible - based
church leaders to recover the discipline of taking us systematically through the Psalms, whether we like them or not, whether we
think they're nice or not, and whether we understand them or not.
Its an interesting and concerning that people can and do live in information silos (including me) and are kept their by
leaders of institutional
church who want them to
think in certain ways like you must come to sunday
church and made to feel guilty if they do nt.
This passage describes the
leaders on the construction site, which we can
think of as the Foremen (Eph 4:11), the people who do the work, or the Crew (Eph 4:12), the construction Model that we are imitating and turning into a reality (Eph 4:13), and the Program goal that the
church will fulfill once it is constructed (Eph 4:14 - 16).
What seems most evident in the case of the modern pastoral director is that he can
think of himself neither as parish parson responsible for all the people in a geographic area nor as the abbot of a convent of the saved, but only as the responsible
leader of a parish
church; it is the Church, not he in the first place, that has a parish and responsibility f
church; it is the
Church, not he in the first place, that has a parish and responsibility f
Church, not he in the first place, that has a parish and responsibility for it.
For the Youngstown area to have as many
churches as we do I can only
think of a handful of
church leaders who have tried to do more outreach to the communities the
churches are actually in and almost none that live in more well off neighborhoods here.
so we can all stop judging eachother and start encouraging others starting with our own family, the word does say that you and your household will be saved, but thats to much like work its easier to play christian around your
church you belong to and play follow the
leader and go around telling people that God loves them tell them all about how they are sinners you know the bit, an thats it go home and freak out on your famliy members because their not save like you maybe they are and you cant even tell because they do nt measure up to your
churches standards even though God says we have all fallen short and that our rightousness is filthy rags, we need to stop useing the word of God as though we
think we know what were doing, do you really
think that when God said I will give you all authority He ment you?
A survey that William McKinney and I recently conducted invited 1,500 conservative and mainline Protestant denominational
leaders to choose from a list of 63 contemporary religious
leaders and authors the ten who have had «the greatest impact on your
thinking about the
church's life and mission today.»
The
leaders of two of Britain's major
church denominations have urged the government to
think twice before agreeing to take part in military action against Islamic State (IS).