Specifically, a large percentage of former religious adherents disagree with official
church positions on issues pertaining to the LGBT community.
For that matter latest polls demonstrate that even a majority of Catholics disagree with the official
church position on this issue, and an even stronger majority oppose the restrictions on birth control.
Not exact matches
Of course the mormon
church is as internally inconsistant as any other religious group and has had just about every
position on just about every
issue over time.
I too am a Catholic who disagrees with his
Church's
position on contraception (and a whole host of other
issues too).
The Catholic
Church's position on artificial birth control has NO basis in the teachings of Christ... it was not an issue then... the teaching is solely based on the opinion of the men running the church who claim «divine inspiration»... BULL... they wanted people to have more kids so they could contribute more money to the church so that the so - called «princes of the church» could maintain their princely life -
Church's
position on artificial birth control has NO basis in the teachings of Christ... it was not an
issue then... the teaching is solely based
on the opinion of the men running the
church who claim «divine inspiration»... BULL... they wanted people to have more kids so they could contribute more money to the church so that the so - called «princes of the church» could maintain their princely life -
church who claim «divine inspiration»... BULL... they wanted people to have more kids so they could contribute more money to the
church so that the so - called «princes of the church» could maintain their princely life -
church so that the so - called «princes of the
church» could maintain their princely life -
church» could maintain their princely life - style.
It is not without interest that such dissenters are frequently most enthusiastic about the
Church taking official
positions on innumerable
issues in political dispute.
Instead, they want the
church to change its position on some very controversial and contentious issues (a key example is the gay / lesbian push for acceptance of a sinful behavior), and that's not going to happen... most especially not in the Roman Catholic Church or Eastern Orthodox C
church to change its
position on some very controversial and contentious
issues (a key example is the gay / lesbian push for acceptance of a sinful behavior), and that's not going to happen... most especially not in the Roman Catholic
Church or Eastern Orthodox C
Church or Eastern Orthodox
ChurchChurch.
I suspected I'd get a little pushback from fellow Christians who hold a complementarian perspective
on gender, (a
position that requires women to submit to male leadership in the home and
church, and often appeals to «biblical womanhood» for support), but I had hoped — perhaps naively — that the book would generate a vigorous, healthy debate about things like the Greco Roman household codes found in the epistles of Peter and Paul, about the meaning of the Hebrew word ezer or the Greek word for deacon, about the Paul's line of argumentation in 1 Timothy 2 and 1 Corinthians 11, about our hermeneutical presuppositions and how they are influenced by our own culture, and about what we really mean when we talk about «biblical womanhood» — all
issues I address quite seriously in the book, but which have yet to be engaged by complementarian critics.
Steinfels appreciates Carter's «centrist»
position on issues such as
church and state, homosexuality, and abortion.
Bases of the Social Concept of the Russian Orthodox
Church, the Russian Orthodox
Church's official document outlining its
position on social
issues, calls grave social ills, such as alcoholism and drug addiction, «a retribution for the ideology of consumerism, for the cult of material prosperity, for the lack of spirituality, and the loss of authentic ideals.»
Church assemblies do indeed take
positions on many public
issues, frequently invoking Scripture as a defense for their viewpoint.
Given the latest medical data concerning the distinct characteristics of the fetus and its ability to survive outside the womb at a startlingly early age, it is little wonder that in the past few years several of the denominations that once took a more open
position on abortion have retreated somewhat: the Presbyterian
Church (U.S.A.) is now studying the
issue; in a 1980 statement
on social principles, the UMC moved to a more qualified
position; the Episcopal
Church and the recently formed Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America seem to be in the process of toning down their earlier
positions (or those of a predecessor body) The Lutherans defeated a resolution in their 1989 Assembly which would have been consistent with the liberal
position of the LCA predecessor body, and a 1988 Lutheran - Episcopal dialogue report refers to the fetus as «embryonic humanity» with claims
on society.
On this crucial
issue Wyschogrod carefully distinguishes between what he believes was the
church's original view and what later became its standard
position.
Orthodox converts told me that they find comfort in the stability of the
church, that
positions on issues such as homosexuality and abortion have already been decided and will not change any time soon.
Mr Newcome said the debate was not about the ethics of abortion, pointing out that the
Church's
position on that
issue is clearly stated.
The
Church doesn't define the standard
on this, given that the Bible takes a clear
position on the gay
issue.
The second questionable way in which minorities in the once mainline
churches try to re-form the
churches is by identifying true Christianity with the adoption of what are perceived as radical
positions on various contemporary
issues of personal and social ethics.
Whereas confessional Lutherans defend the historic Christian
position of the
church on hot - button
issues such as same - sex marriage, the ELCA and its partners have embraced the secular world's
positions on these
issues.
In a debate with an advocate for abortion, one occasionally comes up against an informed opponent who seeks to undermine the
Church's
position on the
issue by pointing out that the Universal Doctor of the
Church, St Thomas Aquinas, held to the doctrine of delayed animation or hominisation.
Romney has struggled to win over many social conservatives who felt that his past
positions on social
issues were too liberal and many evangelicals who raised theological concerns over Romney's membership in the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - Day Saints.
When I read between the lines of the New Testament, I see, along with the good, a very chaotic community that struggled with the same
issues the contemporary
church struggles with: ambition, power,
position, money, possessions, charismata and worship, order, heresy, dress, the abuse of the sacraments, teaching, and so
on.
Even though 50 % of Americans share the Catholic
Church's
positions on these two
issues.
Pulpit Freedom Sunday, an annual event organized by the Alliance Defending Freedom (formerly the Alliance Defense Fund), flaunts an IRS tax code restriction stating that
churches risk their tax - exempt status if they endorse specific political candidates or
positions on ballot
issues.
The enthusiastic advocacy by the Lubavitch Hassidim of menorahs
on public property and public funds for yeshivas has shattered the once monolithic «Jewish»
position on church - state
issues.
«many people are offended and / or frustrated by the very sight of the cross because of the atrocities committed by the
church and
positions the
church takes
on certain
issues.»
A religious right activist group from Washington placed them in our
church's vestibule, outlining the Christian
position on issues.
Very few object to denominations speaking out
on public
issues, and most (80 per cent) agree with most of their own
church body's
positions in this field.
A month later, Archbishop Justin Rigali
issued a statement reiterating the
Church's
position on such matters, citing several
Church sources including Pope John Paul II's 1998 statement calling medically assisted food and water «an ordinary means of preserving life.»
The
issue is the LDS
Church's
position on equal partnership in marriage, not how it decides its leadership.
Jeffrey R. Chadwick, an associate professor of
church history and doctrine at BYU, published an article in the latest issue of BYU Studies on Dating the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints has taken no official position on the exact date of Christ's
church history and doctrine at BYU, published an article in the latest
issue of BYU Studies
on Dating the The
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints has taken no official position on the exact date of Christ's
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter - day Saints has taken no official
position on the exact date of Christ's birth.
Verdict: 4 Stars As the world watches to see where the
position of leader of the Catholic
church is headed and who will be tapped to fill the role, to those
on the outside of the
issue there may be some confusion about the election of a new Pope and the status of the previous one.
For those of us with no religious beliefs framing your argument in terms of the Catholic
church's
position on the
issue is entirely meaningless.