Not exact matches
No less important, he said, the Catholic
Church also claims an «authoritative
teaching authority not made by other Christian communities, and certainly not by the NAE.»
On Luther's side, the final break with the
Church authorities came in the wake of Leo X's bull of November 1518; in that document, as Luther saw it, Leo arrogated to himself the power of defining
Church teaching without accountability to Scripture, the Fathers, or the ancient canons.
Evangelical Catholicism affirms divine revelation and embraces its
authority, which continues through history in the
teaching authority of the
Church.
Sabio, I do not share your atheistic beliefs, but I definitely share many of your criticisms of the formal theological beliefs
taught by the institutional
Church authorities.
In communion with the body of faithful Christians through the ages, we also affirm together that the entire
teaching, worship, ministry, life, and mission of Christ's
Church is to be held accountable to the final
authority of Holy Scripture, which, for Evangelicals and Catholics alike, constitutes the word of God in written form (2 Timothy 3:15 - 17; 2 Peter 1:21).
Iniatially, the Magisterial (
Teaching)
Authority of the Catholic
Church was collegial, the Pope in union with the Bishops.
The Catholic
Church is and has been the Biblical
teaching authority for ALL Christians for 2000 + years and will continue to be because Jesus said all the powers of hell (including propserity organizations operating under the pretext of Christianity) would NOT prevail against it.
But now I say unto you, report those who disagree with you to the
church or denominational
authorities, label them heretics or say that they raise «red flags» and let everyone know not to listen to them, criticize their positions without ever going to them personally to find out what they actually believe and are
teaching, align them with other «heretics» without ever researching their books, writings, and messages, and above all, side with your friends against them even if you personally have never been hurt or offended by them.
The council also led to a renewal of the liturgy, an affirmation of religious freedom and the primacy of conscience, a rejection of
church - state unions, an openness to the truth of other religions (especially Judaism) and a renewed sense that the
church's
teaching authority resides in all of the faithful, not exclusively in the hierarchy.
(Mt 16:17) Thus papal infallibility is effectively exercised when according to the «manifest meaning and intention» (Vatican II, Constitution on the
Church, n. 25) of the
teaching, the Pope invokes the
authority of Christ to confirm and define a traditional doctrine of faith or morals.
I have heard
teachings that a marriage will only properly illustrate Christ's relationship with the
church when the husband steps fully into his leadership role and the wife responds by joyfully placing herself under his
authority.
Thus papal infallibility is effectively exercised when according to the «manifest meaning and intention» (Vatican II, Constitution on the
Church, n. 25) of the
teaching, the Pope invokes the
authority of Christ to confirm and define a traditional doctrine of faith or morals.
It is to be the
teaching authority, the ruling power, and the pastoral directive of the future
church.
And again: «Let us hear the
church when it
teaches and admonishes,» he writes, «but one must not believe because of the
authority of the
church.
However, it is essential that they are given a thorough grounding in what the
Church teaches and especially the reasons why it does so and with what
authority.
Sure, the
church you attend... whatever,... but the religion you believe in
teaches right from wrong and claims a connection to, or understanding of, or words directly from, the supposed ultimate moral
authority does it not?
When the practicing Christian talks to modern man about the «Law of God,» the «
Teaching of the
Church,» or invokes the
authority of Holy Scripture, he is to his own mind bringing out the heaviest weapons in his armory.
Integral Christian living means (i) being part of Jesus's family (i.e. being in «Communion» with the Holy Trinity, physically and spiritually), through having the actual touch of Christ in Baptism, Confirmation and Communion, and (ii) receiving his
Teaching through the Church's magisterium (i.e. «teaching authority&
Teaching through the
Church's magisterium (i.e. «
teaching authority&
teaching authority»).
There need not be truly subjective guilt either in the case of the individual or of a social group, even when the subjective conscience is confronted with the official
teaching of the
Church as a formally binding
authority.
We need to
teach on submission and
church authority structures in a way that equips women abused by the very leadership to which they were called to submit to boldly live out their gifting as co-heirs with Jesus Christ.
The
Church for them is not only the sacramental intermediary of grace and the
teaching authority for the true statement of the hidden mysteries of God, but also has a pastoral power by which it can contribute quite considerably to determining the concrete action of its members in the tangible and sober reality of everyday life.
The
Church gives faith historical force and solidity by defining dogma and
teaching it with
authority.
The
Church herself and her
authority to
teach provide crucial warrants for seeing a developing doctrine as the deepening of a continuous, unchanging revealed truth.
Rather, enlightened by Christian wisdom and giving close attention to the
teaching authority of the
Church, let the layman take on his own distinctive role [Gaudium et spes].
Church authority has added to its problems by failing to recognize explicitly the somewhat provisional nature of its
teaching in these areas.
Bousma noted that the
teaching authority of the
church was claimed by the theological faculty, leading to a division between them and the «clergy who minister to the whole body of the faithful.»
Church authorities have taken action against some theologians who have dissented from the official
teaching on matters of sexual morality.
He describes in characteristically straightforward language Protestantism's crisis of
authority and its need for real shepherds: «The
Church must have not only normative sources written down on paper but also authoritative officeholders ordained to
teach the whole
Church.»
The missionaries are careful to
teach the young
churches biblical principles of
authority and organization.
These various kinds of
authority —
church authority as institutional and communal, Scriptural
authority as
teaching and judicatory, personal
authority as spiritual and moral — are intricately interrelated.
Irony is involved because it appears to be the case that the office of Bishop among Episcopalians has become increasingly separated from that
authority by which some are given the right and duty to
teach and uphold the
church's rule of faith and forms of life.
A close Nerbal study of such writings as the Epistle of James, the First Epistle of John, and the ethical sections of most of the Pauline Epistles, is needed to show how deeply embedded in the
teaching of the early
Church was the tradition of the words of Jesus which gave
authority to it all.
The grounds on which
church authorities resisted the advancing claims of the sciences were in the first place simply that they were at variance with the accepted
teachings handed down from ancient times.
The
Church of Rome attributed divine authority to the general corpus of Catholic teaching, which included the Bible, traditions of long standing, and the belief that the Divine Head of the church would not allow His church to err on important i
Church of Rome attributed divine
authority to the general corpus of Catholic
teaching, which included the Bible, traditions of long standing, and the belief that the Divine Head of the
church would not allow His church to err on important i
church would not allow His
church to err on important i
church to err on important issues.
Christian spirituality is based on the
teaching of Jesus, as known through the Scriptures, and interpreted by the Christian tradition, generally through the
authority of the
churches.
But the
church in particular thought that its
teaching possessed incontestable
authority because it had been received in ancient times by divine revelation.
I know many complementarians who, although they believe men should hold
authority over women in the home,
church, and society, make an exception for the marriage bed, acknowledging the Apostle Paul's
teachings on mutuality in this regard (1 Corinthians 7:1 - 5).
Taken together, they argue for «change» but, in the hands of O'Malley, with a wary glance upon the inherited tradition of the
Church, earlier conciliar authenticity and the
authority of papal
teaching.
He gave his Apostles his own
authority to
teach the Word of God and govern the
Church.
I do not permit a woman to
teach or to assume
authority over a man; she must be quiet» and then they silence women in the
church... in a well - meaning way.
Every thoughtful person has understood that the pro-life position - explicitly and consistently articulated by the Catholic
Church at every level of
teaching authority - is that justice requires that every unborn child be cared for andprotected in law.
If a Catholic educational institution accepts this mission for its theology programmes it will naturally function with a respect for magisterial
authority and
teaching, a love for the
Church's tradition and a desire to transmit it without modification.
But it is quite clear that the Catholic
Church teaches «as one with
authority».
These questions are not without significance, touching on the person of Christ and the nature of faith, and the answers will only come from an engaged discussion of the
authority of Scripture, the historical witness of the
church, and the clarity with which the councils, creeds, and confessions give expression to the
teaching of the Bible.
In Genesis 3, the woman usurped
authority over her husband and took the lead in the Fall, and is now forbidden to do so in the local
church by
teaching Scriptures to men.
The
Church believes it's the teacher nothing more and if it had not been for the
Church's
authority against dangerous heresies like Albigensianism which
taught people that all the physical world is evil and caused people to starve themselves.
One indication of this is the emphasis in recent
Church documents on obedience to the hierarchical
teaching authority and on the relationship between hierarchical superiority and subordination.
The illusion of the conviction of the Holy Spirit... which is really an emotional response to something being very wrong and the turmoil experienced when these feelings contradict all you've been
taught by the
church and its Pastor, who has set him / herself up as the supreme anointed
authority under God and is due utmost and unquestionable respect.
In such a case, if it exists, the scientist would, of course, be compelled to withdraw his assent to the legitimate
teaching authority of the
Church, if it were supposed that he really considered the certainty of the scientific «result» as definitively truer and surer than the grounds which he had previously believed he possessed in justification for the claim of the
Church to
teach.
Can the
church teach with clarity and
authority in a responsible relationship to its own past?