Sentences with phrase «circuit court decisions as»

«I expect that the FEC will conclude that it must allow both candidates to treat contributions raised and spent between the district court and circuit court decisions as being for a second primary election and that both candidates will have to report them accordingly,» he said.

Not exact matches

The ITC's decision came as the two companies faced off in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington.

That petition challenges a U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision that, as the Cato Institute, Reason Foundation, and a group of law professors explained in a supporting amicus brief, exacerbates a «system» already «stacked in favor of the government.»

The Court's own case law shows that in order to maintain the abortion right at the level of fundamental law, many other sectors of the states» legal order, at both statutory and common law, need to be altered: family law, marriage law, laws regulating the medical profession, and, as we now see with the recent circuit court decisions, criminal laws prohibiting private use of lethal fCourt's own case law shows that in order to maintain the abortion right at the level of fundamental law, many other sectors of the states» legal order, at both statutory and common law, need to be altered: family law, marriage law, laws regulating the medical profession, and, as we now see with the recent circuit court decisions, criminal laws prohibiting private use of lethal fcourt decisions, criminal laws prohibiting private use of lethal force.

WASHINGTON, DC — Today the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), as part of a coalition of food, farm and oil industry groups, filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court asking that it reverse the DC Circuit Court's August 2012 decision to dismiss its challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) decision to allow gasoline containing 15 percent ethanol («E15») to be sold for cars manufactured in the 2007 model year or later.

«It is not clear beyond a reasonable doubt that a rational jury would have reached the same conclusion if properly instructed, as is required by the law for the verdict to stand,» Jose Cabranes of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision said in his decision.

The decision from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals was sparked by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, whose conviction was overturned by the nation's highest court in a ruling that narrowed the definition of the types of official acts that could be considered as part of quid pro quo arrangemCourt of Appeals was sparked by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, whose conviction was overturned by the nation's highest court in a ruling that narrowed the definition of the types of official acts that could be considered as part of quid pro quo arrangemCourt's decision in the case of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, whose conviction was overturned by the nation's highest court in a ruling that narrowed the definition of the types of official acts that could be considered as part of quid pro quo arrangemcourt in a ruling that narrowed the definition of the types of official acts that could be considered as part of quid pro quo arrangements.

The Legal team for Exton Cubic Limited has described the verdict by the Accra Circuit Court overturning Lands Minister Peter Amewu's decision to revoke the company's mining license as satisfactory.

As such, any cases that are brought to Federal Judiciary will be tried by lower Federal judges (circuit courts I assume) and then the circuit court decision on the case will be the law of the land until (at some point in indeterminate future) SCOTUS is re-constituted and overturns one of those decisions.

A total of 96 green card holders applied to start the citizenship process at a fair in the Manhattan offices of the union, which billed the event as a «response to the Fifth Circuit Court's decision.»

The legislative prayer practice of the House of Representatives is consistent with the decisions of the Supreme Court and the D.C Circuit, as well as the Rules of the House.

The federal district court affirmed the Department of Education's decision, as did the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley decicourt affirmed the Department of Education's decision, as did the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley deciCourt of Appeals, applying the Supreme Court's reasoning in the Rowley deciCourt's reasoning in the Rowley decision.

This could mean that the Court as presently composed will never decide the issue, even though a conflicting decision exists in the First Circuit, which read the law differently.

Many are viewing Thursday's Supreme Court affirmation of the Fifth Circuit's decision to allow University of Texas to consider race in admissions in the Fisher v. University of Texas case as a victory.

In a 3 - 2 ruling on June 16, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit reversed a decision by a three - judge panel of the same court last October that had struck down the district's student - assignment policy as unconstitutionally discriminaCourt of Appeals for the 1st Circuit reversed a decision by a three - judge panel of the same court last October that had struck down the district's student - assignment policy as unconstitutionally discriminacourt last October that had struck down the district's student - assignment policy as unconstitutionally discriminatory.

The latter is more likely to occur in school districts such as Fort Wayne, Indiana, that have enough whites left to actually integrate a number of magnet schools and where there has been no strong circuit court decision rejecting the use of race.

Whether teachers and students in charter schools have a comparable right can be a tricky legal question, as a recent decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals shows.

NSBA is joined by AASA, the School Superintendents Association; the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP), and the Pennsylvania School Boards Association (PSBA) in asking the Supreme Court to reverse the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and reaffirm that school officials have authority to determine that messages such as «I [heart] Boobies» disrupt the school environment and interfere with the rights of others.

«It is important for the U.S. Supreme Court to take this case, as the Ninth Circuit opinion ignores 20 years of precedents on special education law and represents yet another example of a federal agency exceeding its authority over educational decision making,» NSBA Executive Director Thomas J. Gentzel said.

«We urge the Court to again recognize as it did in Ohio v. Clark the unique role that school personnel play in protecting children by reporting suspected abuse, and reversing the shortsighted decision of the Sixth Circuit.»

The court's conservative justices said they were inclined to reverse a 9th Circuit Court decision requiring immigration judges to give a bond hearing and consider possible release for noncitizens who have been jailed for more than six months, while the liberal justices sounded unsure as to whether a specific time limit can be upcourt's conservative justices said they were inclined to reverse a 9th Circuit Court decision requiring immigration judges to give a bond hearing and consider possible release for noncitizens who have been jailed for more than six months, while the liberal justices sounded unsure as to whether a specific time limit can be upCourt decision requiring immigration judges to give a bond hearing and consider possible release for noncitizens who have been jailed for more than six months, while the liberal justices sounded unsure as to whether a specific time limit can be upheld.

As for Google, a spokewoman stated that they «are grateful that the court has agreed to uphold the decision of the Second Circuit which concluded that Google Books is transformative and consistent with copyright law.»

Under a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court decision involving movie tickets, now known as the Interstate Circuit Doctrine, collusion can be proven by circumstantial evidence when it's clear that without the agreement of the group, each firm would be acting against its own interest, he said.

In 2010 in an appeal from a hearing officer's decision, the Circuit Court for the 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami - Dade County, ruled that the subjective identification of a dog as a «pit bull» by an animal control officer violated the dog's owner's right to due process.

The game makers are wrong to argue that the Federal Circuit should rehear the case because the appellate court panel allegedly created a «safe harbor» for technological ideas, as the court simply followed precedent for abstract claims as set by Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its bcourt panel allegedly created a «safe harbor» for technological ideas, as the court simply followed precedent for abstract claims as set by Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its bcourt simply followed precedent for abstract claims as set by Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its bCourt decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its brief.

In a decision that strikes a blow against the federal government's controversial practice of excluding industry from consent decrees with environmental citizen groups, a practice known as «sue - and - settle,» the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the district court's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9thCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the district court's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9thcourt's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9th Cir.

Cognizant of the fact that the executive order could render any decision on CPP legality a mere advisory opinion, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals withheld its judgment for at least 60 days as this EPA review was undertaken.

California must assert its right to regulate industrial hemp as permitted by the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. Congress and the 2004 9th U.S. Circuit Court decision in HIA v. DEA.

Pai may have a difficult road ahead, as the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the government's position on net neutrality rules in a 2 - to - 1 decision from a three - judge panel just this past year.

Under the Detainee Treatment Act, the Circuit Court has the authority to provide limited review of military decisions to continue holding Guantanamo prisoners as «enemy combatants.»

Some patent lawyers say all this Supreme wrist - slapping has been felt by the Federal Circuit, as most notably evidenced by its August decision In re Seagate Technology, in which it overruled a quarter century of its own decisions and brought itself more in line with Supreme Court precedent.

For 27 decisions that Judge Roberts participated in on the D.C. Circuit, Mike Fox has «provided a brief description of the court's actions, Judge Roberts» role in the decision and characterized it as either for the employee or employer position.

As Scott Greenfield points out, the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court's decision by Judge Dean Pregerson who concluded that individuals have a privacy interest in computers, which are more like diaries holding personal secrets than a suitcase that merely holds objects.

As a result, any and all decision by administrative agencies will be litigated under de novo review in circuit court and again at the appeals court.

It asked the court to tell the jury about that interpretation of the patent (which will now finally happen, tomorrow, as a result of the Federal Circuit decision), and it wanted to point to Apple's own 60 - cent - per - device damages claim over this patent in the Motorola case.

«The 2nd Circuit now recognizes that district courts have discretion to deviate from the guidelines, way up or way down, so long as the district court judge justifies that decision,» he said...

As for losers, Berman writes that the Supreme Court decisions limit the Circuit Courts» power.

At his blog Decision of the Day, Robert Loblaw reports on a student speech decision issued yesterday by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Wisniewski v. Board of Education of the Weedsport Central School District, coming close on the heels of the Supreme Court's June 25 decision in Morse v. Frederick, better known as the «Bong Hits 4 Jesus caseDecision of the Day, Robert Loblaw reports on a student speech decision issued yesterday by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Wisniewski v. Board of Education of the Weedsport Central School District, coming close on the heels of the Supreme Court's June 25 decision in Morse v. Frederick, better known as the «Bong Hits 4 Jesus casedecision issued yesterday by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Wisniewski v. Board of Education of the Weedsport Central School District, coming close on the heels of the Supreme Court's June 25 decision in Morse v. Frederick, better known as the «Bong Hits 4 Jesus casedecision in Morse v. Frederick, better known as the «Bong Hits 4 Jesus case.»

That is the question Lyle Denniston asked Friday at SCOTUSblog, as another round of decisions from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals failed to address the cases involving the legal rights of foreign nationals being held at the U.S. military prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The fact that Google - Motorola argues against the significance of Judge Posner's ruling, implicitly announcing an appeal and belittling it as a «non-binding district court decision» (Judge Posner, a circuit judge who usually only hears apeals, was sitting «by designation» on a district court for that particular case), shows that some people made a mistake (or purposely wanted to mislead) by portraying the ruling as a defeat only, or mostly, for Apple.

As I first noted here, the Supreme Court's decision in Rita upholds the Fourth Circuit's decision to adopt a presumption of reasonableness for within - guideline sentences, but also indirectly approves of other circuits» decisions to resist adopting this presumption.

2016), the judge noted the majority of courts, as well as the dissenting judge in the Ninth Circuit decision, had determined that those regulations were not entitled to deference, see id.

In a recent decision, a three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) acted properly in issuing a final decision as to some — but not all — claims challenged in...

Qualcomm makes some public interest arguments about the importance of protecting intellectual property, but it probably knows that it's preaching to the converted when telling the Federal Circuit about the importance of IP to innovation, and focuses on making an argument that characterizes Judge Posner's decision to deny injunctive relief as inconsistent with Supreme Court and Federal Circuit precedent.

Here I will piggyback on Pattis» perspective: I think Monday's decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has negatively affected Nancy Grace's credibility as a legal commentator and I think its the responsibility of CNN and CourtTV to either disclose these decisions to the audience and / or take action.

Two months ago, I posted about a 7th Circuit decision, Redwood v. Dobson, where the court censured two attorneys for their conduct during a deposition that the court characterized as a «grudge match.»

We can welcome the brave new world of child support magistrates» court appeals in the county court (I know of two circuit judges who, to my knowledge, have experience of one child support case each; and on the same point they made different decisions — which is relevant, as will be seen below).

The supplement provides access to the articles of the journal, as well as to case reviews of 9th Circuit court decisions and to comments.

But here there is a split among federal courts of appeals on an important constitutional question — the D.C. Circuit and the Fifth Circuit take the individual rights view (see here and here for why the Fifth Circuit's decision can't be dismissed as dictum), while I think nine other circuits take the collective rights view.

Mike Fox describes a 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding Costco's dress code: The court upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was required by her religious beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.&rCourt of Appeals decision upholding Costco's dress code: The court upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was required by her religious beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.&rcourt upheld «Costco's dress policy against a challenge by an employee who argued her right to wear her eyebrow piercing was required by her religious beliefs as a member of the Church of Body Modification.»