Sentences with phrase «circuit courts post»

All but three of the federal circuit courts post audio recordings of oral arguments.

Not exact matches

«While we had significant victories in the federal district courts in New York and Boston and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, the reversal of the Second Circuit decision in June by the U.S. Supreme Court has proven difficult to overcome,» Kanojia conceded in a blog post titled «The «Next Chapter.»

And for prior coverage on the Surly Subgroup, see this post on our amicus brief, explaining why the Ninth Circuit should reverse the Tax Court's decision invalidating the regulation.

For my good friends at the Georgia Family Council, I wrote a post on a recent decision by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Jennifer Keeton's suit against faculty and administrators in the graduate counseling program at Augusta State University.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit tossed out Silver's 2015 conviction last month on charges that he used his assembly post to enrich himself by obtaining illegal payments from two entities he helped steer state funds into.

A county circuit court judge today quashed a subpoena issued by Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli that sought documents related to work by climate scientist Michael Mann, according to The Washington Post.

Posts cover actions of the Iowa Supreme Court, Iowa appellate courts, Iowa legislature and the St. Louis based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals as well as intellectual property law topics.

Posts focus on legal developments affecting employers, with an emphasis on Wisconsin and the Chicago - based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals as well as national trends and relevant U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence.

Posted in Editorials Comments Off on Dane County Circuit Court Judge Strikes Down Wisconsin's Right - to - Work Law, Appeal Anticipated

Home Daily News 7th Circuit blocks disability abortion ban;... Constitutional Law By Debra Cassens Weiss Posted April 20, 2018, 3:34 pm CDT A federal appeals court has upheld a permanent injunction blocking an Indiana law that banned abortions based on race, sex, ancestry, Down syndrome or other genetic disorders.

My post began, «A librarian who works for a very large federal appellate court based in the western United States emails: «Comedian Richard Pryor nominated to Eleventh Circuit?

-- authored by Circuit Judge Hurwitz [majority decision] and concurring opinion by Circuit Judge Reinhardt; discussed in our Oct. 10, 2015 post: District court in Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act case which substantially reduced fee request was reversed based upon its reliance on inapt practice area hourly rates, upon its discounts for plaintiff's attorneys not delegating tasks to associates given that only small firms prosecuted these type of cases, and upon its use of stale prior fee awards involving fee claimant's attorneys.

As I noted in a past post, several state bar associations filed amicus, or friend of the court, briefs supporting the position of the Dental Board and several alternative legal providers and law professors filed amicus briefs supporting the Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 2015)-- authored by Circuit Judge M.D. Smith; discussed in our Aug. 18, 2015 post: California Civil Code § 1717 policy trumps a foreign choice - of - law clause for fee recovery purposes, accepting ABF Capital / Grove Properties over ABF Capital / Berglass approaches by California's intermediate appellate courts.

In addition to the holidays, I argued at the Fifth Circuit; published two articles at The Huffington Post (here and here); produced a podcast episode on appellate practice for the ABA's Sound Advice series; gave a presentation to the Dallas Bar Association (about the post-election Supreme Court and Trump's list of possible nominees); participated in a panel discussion about e-briefs and legal writing at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief Judges of State Courts of Appeal (in North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free Press.

Yesterday, the Law Memo blog posted a link to a 9th Circuit decision, Pollard v. GEO Group, holding — contrary to what other courts of appeals have ruled — that federal prison inmates may recover damages under the Bivens doctrine from employees of private corporations running those prisons pursuant to contracts with the Bureau of Prisons.

The PrawfsBlog reported in a post this weekend that Palmer then appealed the lower court's ruling to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appcourt's ruling to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of AppCourt of Appeals.

(Notably, the Ninth Circuit also seemed to agree on this point, though less emphatically and it still have a pending en banc action to sort through post - Booker / Rita realities for its district courts.)

And at «Patently - O,» Dennis Crouch has a post titled «Supreme Court Reverses Federal Circuit: Holds that Patentees Always have Burden of Proving Infringement.»

The U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals «consider [s] whether a service provider may change the terms of its service contract by merely posting a revised contract on its website» and decides it can not.

Posts offer insight on the practice of appellate law and commentary from the Atlanta - based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

asks Norm Pattis, Law.com blogger, in a post about Monday's ruling by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on the conduct of CourtTV commentator and anchor Nancy Grace.

There's that gig on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, that lecturer post at the University of Chicago Law School, that blog he co-authors and even his own fan site.

Two months ago, I posted about a 7th Circuit decision, Redwood v. Dobson, where the court censured two attorneys for their conduct during a deposition that the court characterized as a «grudge match.»

The beginning of the post refers (without linking) to an earlier post on the same topic: «Last year in this blog we reported on a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit finding that inherited IRAs were not «retirement funds» exempt from claims of creditors in bankruptcy.»

The Baltimore Injury Lawyer Blog has a post on a Maryland Daily Record article looking at how President - Elect Barack Obama might change the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals which includes Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.

«Sedley Alley's Last - Minute Stay»: At «The Volokh Conspiracy,» Jonathan Adler has a post that begins, «The state of Tennessee executed Sedley Alley in the early morning of June 28 after a series of last - ditch appeals, an unusual 11th hour stay of execution, and a strongly worded order vacating the stay from a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Today, my co-blogger, Bob Ambrogi, posted about this blog, Maryland Court Watcher, where a group of Maryland attorneys provide synopses of «all opinions publicly available on the Internet of the Court of Appeals and Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, the U.S. District Court and Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland, the Maryland Tax Court, and any Circuit Court in Maryland.»

Presumably in an effort to get earlier and ultimately more attention from the Supreme Court clerks evaluating cert petitions, Samsung yesterday filed (once agai well ahead of a deadline) an optional reply brief in support of its request that the Supreme Court review the Federal Circuit's en banc decision in the second Apple v. Samsung case (this post continues below the document):

«Appeals Court Won't Rehear Fox's Attempt to Stop Dish's «Hopper» Ad - Skipper»: At the «Hollywood, Esq.» blog of The Hollywood Reporter, Eriq Gardner has this post reporting on an order and amended opinion that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued today.

Corynne McSherry of Electronic Frontier Foundation has this blog post about a case that she and two other attorneys argued yesterday at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

In addition, although the Federal Circuit has not addressed the broader issue, patent owners should expect that short of actual disclaimer, all statements made during AIA post grant proceedings, including statements in expert reports, will be considered «intrinsic» evidence that a district court may consider, along with the patent specification and prosecution history, in conducting claim construction.

As reported in this post from yesterday, and as explained a bit more via this write - up I provided to the fine folks at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court yesterday in Dean v. United States, No. 15 - 9260 (April 3, 2017)(available here) ruled that the Eighth Circuit had been wrong to hold that, «in calculating the sentence for [a] predicate offense, a judge must ignore the fact that the defendant will serve the mandatory minimums imposed under § 924 (c).»

A Fastcase blog post alerts us to this high cool - factor federal circuit court oral argument feed:

In that post I expressed hopes that Samsung would take the design patent issues in that case to the Supreme Court, and a filing made by Samsung with the Federal Circuit on Wednesday (a motion to stay execution of a mandate, i.e., to prevent Apple from physically collecting money before the case is really over) now states clearly that this will happen (this post continues below the document):

This post is a somewhat ambitious undertaking because I want to take a look not only at Apple's and Samsung's chances in the post-verdict process (before Judge Koh and, looking past the district court, the Federal Circuit) but also draw some comparisons to other smartphone patent cases that have already been appealed to the Fed.

Footnote: Based on a comparison of Bashman's original posting of the opinion and the redacted version that the 2nd Circuit posted today, the Court acted to keep from view details of the FBI interrogation, in which agents allegedly threatened to turn Higazy's family in Egypt over to Egypt's security service, which could use torture and «give his family hell.»

On July 30, 2016, we posted that the Ninth Circuit certified as a question to the California Supreme Court whether a dissolving law firm has any property interest in unfinished hourly business.

The Ninth Circuit's opinion is available here, and John Elwood of the Volokh Conspiracy offers an interesting overview in his post last week speculating on whether the Court would review the case.

WSJ.com's «Law Blog» has posted the reply brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at this link.

On September 29, 2016, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, No. 15 - 1406 (U.S.), a Ninth Circuit 2 - 1 decision [discussed in our July 21, 2015 post], and consolidated it with Musnuff v. Haeger, No. 15 - 1491 (U.S.).

Complaint for Damages (PDF file), Cause No. 18C01 -1208-PL, Doe v. Ball State University, et al, Circuit Court No. 1, Delaware County, Indiana, September 28, 2012 Petition for Removal (PDF file), Cause No. 1:12 - cv - 01464, Doe v. Ball State University, et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, October 10, 2012 More Blog Posts:

For more reading on NASA v. Nelson, see Dan Solove's posts here (arguing that the Court should recognize a constitutional right to information privacy), and here (addressing the merits), as well as Eugene Volokh's discussion of the implications of the Ninth Circuit's holding here.

«Major Third Circuit ruling on post-Booker burden of proof»: At the «Sentencing Law and Policy» blog, Doug Berman has this post about a 2 - 1 ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued today.

«Court To Expedite Appeal In $ 3.4 B Class Action Settlement»: At «The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times,» Mike Scarcella has a post that begins, «The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has agreed to expedite a challenge to the $ 3.4 billion Native American class action settlement that a trial judge declared fair and reasonable.»

And The Los Angeles Times provides a news update headlined «Alex Kozinski calls for investigation into his porn postings; The Calif. judge asked an ethics panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to initiate proceedings after the disclosure about his trove of sexually explicit material.»

Kevin O'Keefe, via Denise Howell, posts about a dissenting opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit that quotes extensively from the blog of Prof. Eugene Volokh.

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, en banc, has released an amended opinion and dissent in the «Dancing Baby» case aka Lenz v. Universal Music Corp, which this blog has posted plenty about previously.

«En banc Second Circuit rejects Apprendi challenge to NY persistent felony statute»: Law professor Doug Berman has this post at his «Sentencing Law and Policy» blog about an en banc ruling that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued today.

While most commentators are upset over the most recent revelations about domestic surveillance in the US, Justice Richard Posner of the US 7th Circuit Court of Appeals has written an opinion piece for the Washington Post calling for more widespread electronic surveillance of Americans.