«[T] he weight of authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even when it is likely
to have an adverse impact on the subjects of the report — usually does not
give rise to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth
Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of
claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assault.