Not exact matches
This is known as the
fallacy of petitio principii (begging the question /
circular logic).
well, I sometimes bring some of those ways of thinking and operating to this blog... I do nt» mean to, it is almost like muscle memory... someone throws out a straw man arguement or
circular logic, or some other logical
fallacy, and well... sometimes I jump at it the way I would over at other blogs without maybe taking a moment to re-adjust my attitude.
More intentional obfuscation from the king of
circular logic and logical
fallacies.
''...
Circular reasoning (also known as paradoxical thinking [1] or circular logic), is a logical fallacy in which «the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying to end up with
Circular reasoning (also known as paradoxical thinking [1] or
circular logic), is a logical fallacy in which «the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying to end up with
circular logic), is a logical
fallacy in which «the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying to end up with».
The one valid point you could make is that
circular logic, as with most logical
fallacies, does not prove a conclusion false, it simply fails to prove that it is true.
Please, Judith; «begs the question» does not mean what it says; it is a phrase denoting the
logic fallacy of
circular reasoning.
John — I had seen those two links, but the error by Vaughan Pratt is much simpler than the screening
fallacy, and is pure
circular logic.