[6] It is true that we exist to worship and evangelize, but these things just bring more people into the church, which is
circular reasoning if we are looking for an ultimate reason for the church.
Not exact matches
If everything goes according to plan, Zappos will take over the old city hall — a slightly loopy paean to 1960s Modernism with a
circular courtyard and an 11 - story tower that for some
reason has no windows on one side — at the end of 2013.
Hence,
if your
reasoning starts by assuming that there is no God, then it can not prove that there is no God, because that would be
circular reasoning.
Oh gosh... you know... I've never even thought of this fallacy... but there are so many that I come across every day I think this one might have to fall as a subcategory of the
Circular Reasoning fallacy
if anything....
-- somehow meteorites are used as confirming evidence the earth is 4.54 billion yrs old because evidence on earth can not be confirmed independently, so let's move to «indisputable»
circular reasoning and say well
if this meteorite is 4.54 billion years old then the earth must also be 4.54 billion years old, since the machine's measurements match.
Once again
if you have information to the contrary, please provide the link for it (do not use a site that comes from a theological standpoint - that is
circular reasoning and proves nothing.
If she doesn't do it, for any
reason, then you will need to wipe the kitten's behind with a warm and wet washcloth in
circular motions, to induce bowel movement.
This seems a bit odd giving an answer that ice sheet changes are caused by ice sheet changes as
if some
circular reasoning hasn't been resolved.
If I did the residual would be zero and R2 = 1, and then I'd agree with you that the
reasoning is
circular.
You claimed that
if density was calculated by NASA using the IGL, that that would be «
circular reasoning.»
A further complication arises
if datasets used in the model evaluation process are the same as those used for calibration, which gives rise to
circular reasoning (confirming the antecedent) in the evaluation process.
If we rely primarily upon computer modeling to resolve the most important questions as to how the natural processes work — as opposed to direct observation — then are we not caught on an infinite merry - go - round of
circular reasoning which leads us only to that set of conclusions which the computer modelers themselves determine?
If there were PhD's in «
Circular Reasoning» or «CYA» you would all be qualified.
so reinterpret Jones all you want, and by all means use
circular reasoning and parsing all you need about what he said,
if it helps you to continue...... avoiding...... a serious discussion on this.
Robert, with a little more time to work through what you wrote, it appears to me that the
reasoning — I'm not sure
if it's yours or Claes Johnson's — is
circular.
But
if one worries too much about «
circular reasoning» there is a very simple technique to avoid it, proposed ten years ago in this very important paper: H. von Storch, Misuses of statistical analysis in climate research.
Then there's the display itself:
If companies like Nest, Samsung, and LG can create
circular LCD panels for their products, we see no
reason why Tivoli should make do with a square display.
Gardner's proposition as to the cause of PAS is rendered tautological by the following kind of
circular reasoning: an alienated child (who is supposedly distinct from an abused child) has by definition a brainwashing parent; hence
if a child is alienated, then a brainwashing parent exists and is the sole cause.»