Sentences with phrase «circulation models run»

Furthermore, the statistical methodology that is used to estimate the model can successfully recover the values for the transient climate response from temperature simulations generated by the coupled atmosphere - ocean general circulation models run for CMIP (26).

Seven global vegetation models are used to analyze possible responses to future climate simulated by a range of general circulation models run under all four representative concentration pathway scenarios of changing concentrations of greenhouse gases.

Not exact matches

This is according to emergency ocean model simulations run by scientists at the National Oceanography Centre (NOC) and The University of Southampton to assess the potential impact of local ocean circulation on the spread of pollutants.

These simulations were run using the leading - edge, high - resolution global ocean circulation model, NEMO.

«We ran five years of ocean circulation in the model, and we measured the damping of energy at every grid point to see what the statistics are,» Fox - Kemper said.

Scientists run general circulations models against these scenarios to project future climate conditions, including atmospheric carbon concentrations.

However, the general circulation models are, at present, timeconsuming and expensive to run, and, despite the known shortcomings of the one - dimensional models, most available predictions of climate change have been made using the simpler models.

There may be reason to strongly suspect that in any sufficiently complicated dynamical system model (such as climate) with stochastic parameters (e.g., exactly when and where a lightning strike starts a major wildfire or a major submarine earthquake perturbs ocean circulation in a region or a major volcanic eruption introduces stratospheric aerosols), it is almost certain that any given run of the model will have periods of significant deviation from the mean of multiple runs.

Vecchi et al. compared the observed trend in the Walker circulation between 1861 and 1992 to that yielded by simulations from the GFDL CM2 general circulation model, run with and without anthropogenic forcing.

GCMs are three - dimensional mathematical models of the atmosphere's circulation that are run on super-computers.

Further analyses of long coupled model runs will be critical to resolve the influence of the ocean thermohaline circulation and other natural climate variations on Arctic climate and to determine whether natural climate variability will make the Arctic more or less vulnerable to anthropogenic global warming.»

Due to computational constraints, the equilibrium climate sensitivity in a climate model is usually estimated by running an atmospheric general circulation model coupled to a mixed - layer ocean model, because equilibrium climate sensitivity is largely determined by atmospheric processes.

An analysis of two coupled atmosphere - ocean general circulation models control runs (UK Met Office HadCM3 and NOAA GFDL CM2.1) agree with the shorter and longer time - scales of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and temperature fluctuations with periodicities close to thoscirculation models control runs (UK Met Office HadCM3 and NOAA GFDL CM2.1) agree with the shorter and longer time - scales of Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and temperature fluctuations with periodicities close to thosCirculation (AMOC) and temperature fluctuations with periodicities close to those observed.

These different SAT trends occur despite the fact that both simulations were subject to the identical radiative forcing and were conducted with the same model, highlighting the role of internal atmospheric circulation variability in any single model run.

Using radiation modeling we estimated how strong the climate forcing would be for each scenario, and then ran general circulation models to see how that forcing would change the climate.

Do GCM's «create» cold fronts and the arctic air flows when they run, or are they «static» heat exchange models only (radiation received and radiation released are obviously their «drivers»... But what happens after the air masses have been «driven» for the equal of one or two «years» — do we see flows in the tropics, mid-latitudes, and polar latitudes than resembles earth's circulation?

«The NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX - GDDP) dataset is comprised of downscaled climate scenarios for the globe that are derived from the General Circulation Model (GCM) runs conducted under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and across two of the four greenhouse gas emissions scenarios known as Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs).

Let's be clear here, they're theorized feedbacks in unverified general circulation models whose results fit the IPCC's expectations, and as you know, when expectations are met it's difficult for even good scientists to look further, let alone for the politicians running the show.

Watanabe ran simulations with five general circulation models (GCMs)-- CanCM4, CNRM - CM5, CSIRO Mk - 3.6, HadCM3, and MIROC5.

When heavy rainfall probabilities were next investigated in ensembles of two atmospheric general circulation models, run with and without anthropogenically - induced sea surface temperature changes, results were model - dependent.

This view is supported by model results that relate the variability of the global - mean SST to North Atlantic thermohaline circulation (30, 31, 35) and by the existence of an AMO - like variability in control runs without anthropogenic forcing (28).

I am distrustful of prediction scenarios for details of the ocean circulation that rely on extremely complicated coupled models that run out for decades to thousands of years.

Personally I'd like the climate boffins, or someone, run the global circulation models with no ocean and see what happens.