The media and information firm Thomson Reuters has done
a citation analysis report to find out who the world's most influential scientific minds are 2014.
The media and information firm Thomson Reuters has done their yearly
citation analysis report to find out who the world's most influential scientific minds are 2015.
Not exact matches
In the first large - scale
analysis of negative
citations, researchers found that 2.4 % of
citations in a major immunology journal were critical, Nature
reports.
The
report combines a comprehensive publication
analysis from Elsevier's Scopus, the largest scientific abstract and
citation database, together with scientists» and other stakeholders» views on current progress and future expectations of the field.
In a statement, AI2's Marie Hagman, a senior product manager who oversees Semantic Scholar, said: «I think the fact that there are no women in the Top 10 authors by the highly influential
citation analysis done by AI2 is spotlighting the well -
reported problem of publication bias in science and in the context of the current global conversation on gender.
And, very soon now, John Mashey will present his exhaustive investigation of other aspects of «strange» scholarship in the Wegman
Report, including a jaw - dropping
analysis of the «Summaries of Important Papers» and a complete breakdown of all references and
citations.
Case
reports matching provides
citations, case
analysis with digests, official transcripts and alternative case
reports for all key law series that are not available on Westlaw UK, including the All England Law
Report Series