Sentences with phrase «cited points of law»

AALL cited Points of Law, a tool developed by Bloomberg Law, for its ability to provide -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

The well - known and repeated law on gleaning is a case in point, where, incidentally, the ger is especially cited.22 Indeed, the tenderness of the law reaches even to the lower creatures.
At the Library of Law and Liberty, Greg Weiner reconsiders Daniel Patrick Moynihan's criticisms of the War on Poverty, and suggests conservatives who frequently cite his work on the subject miss Moynihan's broader point: It was not that too much money was being misspent on the poor, but rather that those resources which were directed at the poor were all too often funneled through the middle class professional classes:
Gangi points to bias in law enforcement, citing data that shows while stop - and - frisks or arrests for certain offenses may be down, racial disparities remain, with people of color stopped or arrested far more often than white people.
With regard to the appropriateness of the Hofmann law and my fit of it to the Keeling curve, I commented on Dec. 5, the second day of this thread, here where I said Embarrassingly I discussed the poster with Pieter Tans, one of the coauthors of the Hofmann et al result cited in the poster, for ten minutes without recognizing his name until he pointed it out.
In two posts I wrote about Bloomberg Law — one earlier this month and one when it launched — I cited something that Bloomberg emphasizes as a key selling point, its flat - fee pricing of $ 450 per user per month.
Hillary Young, who the dissent cites at para. 185, also points out in the McGill Journal of Law and Health that «A review of the common law of consent to medical treatment gives little reason to think it creates entitlements to treatment.&raqLaw and Health that «A review of the common law of consent to medical treatment gives little reason to think it creates entitlements to treatment.&raqlaw of consent to medical treatment gives little reason to think it creates entitlements to treatment.»
I think of law's parallel cites to judgments: wouldn't it be handy to have the neutral citation, e.g., point somehow to all of the reports, online and off; and so forth.
29 Based on the authorities cited — which do not include any Saskatchewan cases on this point — I do not find there is any common law rule of evidence that an accused must testify first.
For each point of law within a case, a pop - up shows the top three cases cited in support of it.
[25] Judge Dennis F. Saylor IV articulated this point by emphasizing the consistency of the Circuit Courts» decisions and citing to a Sixth Circuit multi-district litigation holding «affirming the dismissal of claims against brand - name manufacturers under the laws of 22 states.»
In this regard, Mr. Johnson cites Feng v. Graham [1988] 5 W.W.R. 137 (B.C.C.A.), (not a left turn case), for the principle that the plaintiff's entitlement to assume that other traffic will obey the law, is «subject to the proviso» (in counsel's phrase) that where it is apparent or should be apparent that an oncoming driver is not going to yield the right - of - way, then at that point the other driver must act reasonably and can not simply proceed into the collision, as it were.
-LSB-...] The Alberta Law Reform Institute considered whether the New Rules should allow litigants to be assisted by a «McKenzie friend» adopting the definition of a McKenzie friend as being a -LSB-...] The McKenzie friend's support may range from a role similar to a legal expert (prompting the litigant to make useful points and representations, and examination of witnesses and giving -LSB-...] The rationale for allowing a McKenzie friend is fairness to self - represented litigants: R. v. Leicester City Justice; ex parte Barrow, [1991] 3 All E.R. 935, cited in CM 12.18 -LSB-...]
In rejecting an argument that a conversion claim against a towing company, which had sold a towed vehicle despite the owner's efforts to reclaim it, was preempted by federal law governing a «service» of motor carriers, the Second District cited an internet news story about the inventor of the tow truck.29 The court relied on facts from that article to make the temporal point that Florida law permitted claims for conversion of property before there were tow trucks.
Citing McCamus, The Law of Contracts, (Toronto: Irwin Law Inc., 2005) at 711, the Court of Appeal was careful to point out that an investigation as to evidence of the surrounding circumstances or the surrounding factual matrix is not dependent on a finding the agreement is itself ambiguous.
Nevertheless, the point remains that if there is lawful authority in domestic law, compliance with IHL is not required to justify the conduct for purposes of the statute you cite.
Moreover, this could also be an appropriate test case for the Supreme Court to clarify that the principles set out in National Bank of Canada v. RCIU (the case cited by the hyperbolic Bruce Pardy) do not apply to lawyers, either in their personal or professional capacities, and that Lavigne and Green together stand for the principle that not only is there no right «not to associate» in Canadian law, there is also no right «not to speak» when it comes to lawyers, contrary to the misapprehension of those who are shocked and amazed that the Law Society can require them to adopt a «Statement of Principles» that will, as the supporting legal opinion points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.&raqlaw, there is also no right «not to speak» when it comes to lawyers, contrary to the misapprehension of those who are shocked and amazed that the Law Society can require them to adopt a «Statement of Principles» that will, as the supporting legal opinion points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.&raqLaw Society can require them to adopt a «Statement of Principles» that will, as the supporting legal opinion points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.»
Peisley points out that the facilitative / evaluative divide has been almost an article of faith in mediation circles for the past 15 years (citing Professor Leonard Riskin's theory of mediator orientation as facilitative or evaluative and the problem definition as either «narrow» [position - based] or «broad» [interest - based]-- Riskin, «Understanding Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed» (1996) 1 Harvard Negotiation law Review
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z