AALL
cited Points of Law, a tool developed by Bloomberg Law, for its ability to provide -LSB-...]
Not exact matches
The well - known and repeated
law on gleaning is a case in
point, where, incidentally, the ger is especially
cited.22 Indeed, the tenderness
of the
law reaches even to the lower creatures.
At the Library
of Law and Liberty, Greg Weiner reconsiders Daniel Patrick Moynihan's criticisms
of the War on Poverty, and suggests conservatives who frequently
cite his work on the subject miss Moynihan's broader
point: It was not that too much money was being misspent on the poor, but rather that those resources which were directed at the poor were all too often funneled through the middle class professional classes:
Gangi
points to bias in
law enforcement,
citing data that shows while stop - and - frisks or arrests for certain offenses may be down, racial disparities remain, with people
of color stopped or arrested far more often than white people.
With regard to the appropriateness
of the Hofmann
law and my fit
of it to the Keeling curve, I commented on Dec. 5, the second day
of this thread, here where I said Embarrassingly I discussed the poster with Pieter Tans, one
of the coauthors
of the Hofmann et al result
cited in the poster, for ten minutes without recognizing his name until he
pointed it out.
In two posts I wrote about Bloomberg
Law — one earlier this month and one when it launched — I
cited something that Bloomberg emphasizes as a key selling
point, its flat - fee pricing
of $ 450 per user per month.
Hillary Young, who the dissent
cites at para. 185, also
points out in the McGill Journal
of Law and Health that «A review of the common law of consent to medical treatment gives little reason to think it creates entitlements to treatment.&raq
Law and Health that «A review
of the common
law of consent to medical treatment gives little reason to think it creates entitlements to treatment.&raq
law of consent to medical treatment gives little reason to think it creates entitlements to treatment.»
I think
of law's parallel
cites to judgments: wouldn't it be handy to have the neutral citation, e.g.,
point somehow to all
of the reports, online and off; and so forth.
29 Based on the authorities
cited — which do not include any Saskatchewan cases on this
point — I do not find there is any common
law rule
of evidence that an accused must testify first.
For each
point of law within a case, a pop - up shows the top three cases
cited in support
of it.
[25] Judge Dennis F. Saylor IV articulated this
point by emphasizing the consistency
of the Circuit Courts» decisions and
citing to a Sixth Circuit multi-district litigation holding «affirming the dismissal
of claims against brand - name manufacturers under the
laws of 22 states.»
In this regard, Mr. Johnson
cites Feng v. Graham [1988] 5 W.W.R. 137 (B.C.C.A.), (not a left turn case), for the principle that the plaintiff's entitlement to assume that other traffic will obey the
law, is «subject to the proviso» (in counsel's phrase) that where it is apparent or should be apparent that an oncoming driver is not going to yield the right -
of - way, then at that
point the other driver must act reasonably and can not simply proceed into the collision, as it were.
-LSB-...] The Alberta
Law Reform Institute considered whether the New Rules should allow litigants to be assisted by a «McKenzie friend» adopting the definition
of a McKenzie friend as being a -LSB-...] The McKenzie friend's support may range from a role similar to a legal expert (prompting the litigant to make useful
points and representations, and examination
of witnesses and giving -LSB-...] The rationale for allowing a McKenzie friend is fairness to self - represented litigants: R. v. Leicester City Justice; ex parte Barrow, [1991] 3 All E.R. 935,
cited in CM 12.18 -LSB-...]
In rejecting an argument that a conversion claim against a towing company, which had sold a towed vehicle despite the owner's efforts to reclaim it, was preempted by federal
law governing a «service»
of motor carriers, the Second District
cited an internet news story about the inventor
of the tow truck.29 The court relied on facts from that article to make the temporal
point that Florida
law permitted claims for conversion
of property before there were tow trucks.
Citing McCamus, The
Law of Contracts, (Toronto: Irwin
Law Inc., 2005) at 711, the Court
of Appeal was careful to
point out that an investigation as to evidence
of the surrounding circumstances or the surrounding factual matrix is not dependent on a finding the agreement is itself ambiguous.
Nevertheless, the
point remains that if there is lawful authority in domestic
law, compliance with IHL is not required to justify the conduct for purposes
of the statute you
cite.
Moreover, this could also be an appropriate test case for the Supreme Court to clarify that the principles set out in National Bank
of Canada v. RCIU (the case
cited by the hyperbolic Bruce Pardy) do not apply to lawyers, either in their personal or professional capacities, and that Lavigne and Green together stand for the principle that not only is there no right «not to associate» in Canadian
law, there is also no right «not to speak» when it comes to lawyers, contrary to the misapprehension of those who are shocked and amazed that the Law Society can require them to adopt a «Statement of Principles» that will, as the supporting legal opinion points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.&raq
law, there is also no right «not to speak» when it comes to lawyers, contrary to the misapprehension
of those who are shocked and amazed that the
Law Society can require them to adopt a «Statement of Principles» that will, as the supporting legal opinion points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.&raq
Law Society can require them to adopt a «Statement
of Principles» that will, as the supporting legal opinion
points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.»
Peisley
points out that the facilitative / evaluative divide has been almost an article
of faith in mediation circles for the past 15 years (
citing Professor Leonard Riskin's theory
of mediator orientation as facilitative or evaluative and the problem definition as either «narrow» [position - based] or «broad» [interest - based]-- Riskin, «Understanding Mediator Orientations, Strategies and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed» (1996) 1 Harvard Negotiation
law Review