The 1991 paper is still frequently
cited by climate deniers.
Not exact matches
FYI, this paper is already being widely
cited on blogs
by global warming
deniers as proof that all of the
climate models are wrong, wrong, wrong and that the whole concept of anthropogenic GHG - caused warming has been refuted.
The Journal concluded its editorial
by asserting that it is «ironic» that liberals who «denounce anyone who
cites uncertainties about carbon's
climate impact as «
deniers»» are now «justifying their opposition to fracking based on scientific uncertainties.»
In support of his thesis that
climate deniers live in an echo chamber, Dunlap
cites papers
by Dunlap, Oreskes, Dunlap, Lahsen, Oreskes, Dunlap and Dunlap.
These include claiming that addressing
climate change will keep the poor in «energy poverty»;
citing the global warming «hiatus» or «pause» to dismiss concerns about
climate change; pointing to changes in the
climate hundreds or thousands of years ago to
deny that the current warming is caused
by humans; alleging that unmitigated
climate change will be a good thing; disputing that
climate change is accelerating sea level rise; and
denying that
climate change is making weather disasters more costly.
Shallow as it is, for me this is vindication after years of being laughed at and called names for being a «
Climate denier» in spite of
citing studies
by so many scientists and questioning the constant yearly trend of «adjustments» made to the temperature data NOAA kept posting regularly.
He goes on to
cite a paper
by climate change
denier Bjorn Lomborg that had concluded policies to combat
climate change would «do little to stabilise the
climate.»
Fellow
climate change
denier and journalist Gunter Ederer wrote a piece (German) claiming that there had been «massive alterations» to NASA temperature data,
citing analysis
by Friedrich - Karl Ewert as evidence (as reported
by the skeptical blog NoTricksZone): [3], [4]
Weakening Solar Output Won't Slow Warming Over Next Century One argument often
cited by climate skeptics and global warming
deniers is that solar cycles are responsible for at least part of the warming we're seeing now.