Sentences with phrase «cited by climate skeptics»

Weakening Solar Output Won't Slow Warming Over Next Century One argument often cited by climate skeptics and global warming deniers is that solar cycles are responsible for at least part of the warming we're seeing now.

-- a study that found low - end climate sensitivity and is frequently cited by climate skeptics — Hope calculates a reduction in the SCC of about 45 % for a low climate sensitivity world.

Not exact matches

It's being cited by climate change skeptics quite often and I would like to know how much merit it has.

This «two - camps theory» is then used as a justification to cite (in the name of supposed balance) counter-arguments by «climate skeptics» with doubtful expertise.

Critics note that his work has been frequently cited by «global warming skeptics,» [3] Dr. Pielke and his allies have praised his independence and called his critics «climate McCarthyists.»

Doran's analysis of Antarctic cooling is frequently cited by skeptics to undermine the plausibility of climate models.

When Nobel prize winner Ivar Giaever came out as a climate skeptic he cited a problem posed by a man named Ilan Samson.

Oreskes, in an on - screen appearance, manages to cite S. Fred Singer and Frederick Seitz, two prominent climate - change skeptics who had once contended that smoking isn't necessarily harmful, but admits that she can't prove that they were manipulated by money.

See: Scientific American Cites Climate Depot: «Dr. Judith Curry has caused a stir; she is frequently cited by some of the harshest skeptics around, including Marc Morano» — October 24, 2010

This is the same NPR which featured two attack pieces on skeptic climate scientist Dr Willie Soon here and here, in which the first piece said Dr Soon was valuable to the «forces of climate denial» (the now non-functioning link was to an older version of Dr Soon's Heartland Institute bio page, later replaced by a newer one), and the second piece cited the same Kert Davies who I traced back to the time when the false «crooked skeptic climate scientists» accusation first got its media traction.

After promoting the eco-group World Wildlife Fund's new climate study, the Washington Post's Eilperin also dug up a scientist with a woeful reputation, Robert Corell, and chooses not to identify his employment with the partisan Heinz Foundation, vice-chaired by Teresa Heinz Kerry, wife of Senator John Kerry (who recently claimed: Global Warming Is The Next 9/11) Eilperin felt compelled to state that Fred Singer was a «skeptic» but the reporter felt no obligation to label any other scientists she cited in the article.

We have seen many examples of these lists, for example in The Wall Street Journal and Fox News, but the most frequently - cited list of «skeptics» which was also referenced by Fred Singer in Climate of Doubt (we'll have much more on Fred Singer in an upcoming blog post) is the Oregon Petition.

A study of major U.S. newspapers found that up to 1994, climate scientists who were highly respected by their peers were cited considerably more frequently than the skeptics associated with conservative think tanks, but after 1995, as the conservatives grew more active, newspapers cited the two groups about equally.

Instead, the skeptics» greatest and most - often cited (by them) «peer - reviewed studies» appeared in the journal Climate Research between 1997 - 2003.

Oreskes» «Merchants of Doubt» Chapter 1 is titled «Doubt is Our Product», where she goes to great length within it to make a guilt - by - association accusation that skeptic climate scientists are employing the same «Tobacco Strategy» tactic, citing the «Doubt is Our Product» memo directly on page 34 as a wrap - up for the chapter.

He was cited by Marc Morano to be a climate skeptic, while being the former NASA Supervisor of James Hansen [3].

The surprise to me with this lawsuit is that it doesn't feature sensational evidence like others did — the older Kivalina v Exxon case and the newer San Mateo / Marin / Imperial Beach v. Chevron cases — by citing the infamous «leaked memo set» headlined with «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact,» which are universally accepted among enviro - activists as smoking gun evidence of skeptic climate scientists being paid to push misinformation to the public at the behest of sinister corporate handlers.