Sentences with phrase «cited in journal articles»
At present, as you point out, you can get citations for Canadian cases, provided that they've been cited in journal articles or U.S. decisions; and this could be a handy way to obtain the citation if you're unable to query one of the commercial databases — and the case is too old to be on CanLII.
http://www.slaw.ca/
MUTAGENETIX should be cited in journal articles or on - line publications using the following conventions: -LCB- Authors, Science Writers, Beutler B -RCB-.
Not exact matches
The Times article cited a study published in the journal Psychological Science, which found that when happily married women held their spouses» hand while they received mild electric shocks, the parts of their brain associated with pain were less active than when they weren't holding their spouse's hand.
The first product in the range — a basic unit shaped like a low sofa or bed frame — is expected to go on sale in early 2018, according to The Verge, which cited a (paywalled) article by The Wall Street Journal.
In the past, you cited an article «Systemic equilibrium in a Bretton Woods II - type international monetary system» by Austin in the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics that explained this in detaiIn the past, you cited an article «Systemic equilibrium in a Bretton Woods II - type international monetary system» by Austin in the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics that explained this in detaiin a Bretton Woods II - type international monetary system» by Austin in the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics that explained this in detaiin the Journal of Post Keynesian Economics that explained this in detaiin detail.
He cites an article on «myths about the treatment of addiction» in Lancet, the British medical journal, written by two researchers at the University of Pennsylvania.
Two of the journals cited in the GFI article are considered in the professional community to be less scientific and less subject to peer review than the leading journals.
The journal Addiction has pre-released an article calling for a revision of the regularly cited # 21 billion estimate for the cost of alcohol to society in England and Wales.
A Wall Street Journal article published October 26 cited City Council data showing slumping tax revenue and citing a 1 % drop in those revenues for April through August 2016 compared to the same period the year before.
Some may believe that publication in Big - Time Science is equivalent to two or three society - level articles, but the most important thing is to get your work out there where people can see it by publishing regularly in journals that are widely respected, read, and cited by your peers.
The impact of an article or journal can be measured directly by the number of times the average article is cited in other articles.
A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences reported that, of 1008 articles, «[a] ll 14 of the most highly cited papers in the study were rejected by the three elite journals, and 12 of those were bounced before they could reach peer review.
Science and its sister journals contain some of the most highly cited and influential articles in the world.
Dr Joshi has an international reputation in this area, having published many highly cited articles including one in the journal Science on graphene oxide - based filtration in 2014 while working at the University of Manchester with Nobel Laureate Sir Andre Geim.
Dr. Blennow has published more than 1,000 original research papers and review articles in peer - reviewed journals, has an h - index of 106, and his papers have been cited more than 50,000 times.
The article's author, Alyssa Carducci, cited a paper published earlier this year in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology that looked at the roles of poverty, ethnicity and geography in asthma prevalence.
Further analysis suggested that the direct cost to the NIH is higher for retracted papers published in high - impact journals — those with articles that are the most cited in other research papers within two years of publication.
Until now, most rigorous metrics of scientific impact have relied on citations: the number of peer - reviewed articles a scientist has written, the «impact factor» of the journals in which they were published, and how many times other scientists have cited those articles.
Overall, WSU plant scientists ranked second in terms of number of journal articles published per faculty member in the category (only Berkeley ranked higher in that area) and third in the percentage of faculty whose work was cited by another work.
Its successful blend of articles has made Trends in Biotechnology one of the most highly regarded and highly cited review journals in the field.
A paper on dengue virus infection co-authored by five PNNL researchers was just named one of the 25 percent most - cited articles in the journal PLOS Pathogens.
While the condition isn't frequently cited in legal cases, it was discussed (and largely dismissed) as a potential defense in a 2000 article in the journal Medicine, Science and the Law.
In January 2010, Michael F. Holick, MD PhD, a vitamin D researcher whose work I have cited in previous articles, Linda Linday, a medical doctor whose cod liver oil study formed the starting point for Cannell's 2008 commentary, and several other colleagues, even including one researcher from the National Institutes of Health, made a direct response to Dr. Cannell and his colleagues in the pages of the same journaIn January 2010, Michael F. Holick, MD PhD, a vitamin D researcher whose work I have cited in previous articles, Linda Linday, a medical doctor whose cod liver oil study formed the starting point for Cannell's 2008 commentary, and several other colleagues, even including one researcher from the National Institutes of Health, made a direct response to Dr. Cannell and his colleagues in the pages of the same journain previous articles, Linda Linday, a medical doctor whose cod liver oil study formed the starting point for Cannell's 2008 commentary, and several other colleagues, even including one researcher from the National Institutes of Health, made a direct response to Dr. Cannell and his colleagues in the pages of the same journain the pages of the same journal.
In January 2010, Michael F. Hollick, MD PhD, a vitamin D researcher whose work I have cited in previous articles, Linda Linday, a medical doctor whose cod liver oil study formed the starting point for Cannell's 2008 commentary, and several other colleagues, even including one researcher from the NIH, made a direct response to Dr. Cannell and his colleaugues in the pages of the same journaIn January 2010, Michael F. Hollick, MD PhD, a vitamin D researcher whose work I have cited in previous articles, Linda Linday, a medical doctor whose cod liver oil study formed the starting point for Cannell's 2008 commentary, and several other colleagues, even including one researcher from the NIH, made a direct response to Dr. Cannell and his colleaugues in the pages of the same journain previous articles, Linda Linday, a medical doctor whose cod liver oil study formed the starting point for Cannell's 2008 commentary, and several other colleagues, even including one researcher from the NIH, made a direct response to Dr. Cannell and his colleaugues in the pages of the same journain the pages of the same journal.
Kahlenberg and Potter acknowledge the CRP's methodological problems, but dig the ditch deeper by citing one article that appeared in this journal and eviscerated the CRP's study (see «A Closer Look at Charter Schools and Segregation,» check the facts, Summer 2010) and a 2010 study looking at racial enrollment patterns among charter schools managed by for - profit management organizations, which represent just 12 percent of the charter sector nationally.
In this issue the CITE Journal presents a collection of scholarly articles and editorials describing uses of digital video to teach curricular content and skills in the K - 12 classrooIn this issue the CITE Journal presents a collection of scholarly articles and editorials describing uses of digital video to teach curricular content and skills in the K - 12 classrooin the K - 12 classroom.
For instance, a bibliography of technology and science education articles could be published in CITE Journal, while a literature review based on this bibliography could be submitted to a science education journal, such as the Journal of Science Teacher EduJournal, while a literature review based on this bibliography could be submitted to a science education journal, such as the Journal of Science Teacher Edujournal, such as the Journal of Science Teacher EduJournal of Science Teacher Education.
More general theoretical and research articles that do not address these specific areas are published in the «General Section» of the CITE Journal, under the sponsorship of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education.
The authors take a historical look at the development of the CEE and CITE Journal relationship, reflect on the inaugural article in the CITE Journal English Language Arts Teacher Education section and the principles it presented, and provide a history of the evolution of NCTE / CEE belief statements, resolutions, and standards for teacher preparation as they relate to 21st - century literacies and technologies.
RIM and AT&T wouldn't comment on any of the revelations, which were also featured in a Wall Street Journal article today citing unnamed sources familiar with tests of the new slider.
The ranking depends on six factors including Nobel prize winner alumni and staff, cited researchers selected by Thomas Scientific, Articles published in journals of Science and nature etc..
The sources are supposed employees of the bookselling company, with additional support coming from a Wall Street Journal article that cites the bookseller's plans to double the size of its Nook boutiques in 40 of its stores.
Referring to adverse reactions from vaccines, the Wall Street Journal article cited above (Attachment 2) reports: «In cats there has been a large increase in hyperthyroidism and cancerous tumors between the shoulder blades where vaccines typically are injected.&raquIn cats there has been a large increase in hyperthyroidism and cancerous tumors between the shoulder blades where vaccines typically are injected.&raquin hyperthyroidism and cancerous tumors between the shoulder blades where vaccines typically are injected.»
No, writes Best Friends Animal Society's Peter Wolf on Vox Felina, citing an article about a paper recently published in the journal PLoS ONE:
An article written by the International Communication Association cites the work of Christopher Ferguson, who published a study in the Journal of Communication.
Recent Posts: New Journal Publishes Seven Issues of Bogus Articles to Appear Successful Copying Elsevier A Journal Called Waste OA Publisher Offers Author Fee Waivers in Exchange for Citing Its Journals
You may also kick off a «citation fight», with people claiming certain articles are not in good enough journals, or some of the data or predictions in the published papers turned out to be suspect, or the paper was not reviewed properly, or there are plenty of papers you have not cited which put the cooling argument, and so on and so on.
Was that in any of the «jointly published 23 journal articles» mentioned in the intro, where a reviewer or subsequent citing author could have picked it up?
Imagine if you will, someone like me arguing evidence for AGW coming to CFACT and citing an article from, not a top - tier journal, nor even a second - tier, but more like a third - tier journal like the Asia - Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (which people generally publish in when they can't pass the more rigorous peer review of the more reputable journals), and if that paper were written by a person who's work has had to be corrected by others, not once, not twice, but FOUR times to my knowledge, and every correction takes it back in the opposite direction of what that person was arguing, and if the paper I was citing was this guy making the same old tired argument he's been corrected on before, and if this paper already had evidence of data tampering to get it's conclusions... just imagine the uproar from the usual crowjournal, nor even a second - tier, but more like a third - tier journal like the Asia - Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (which people generally publish in when they can't pass the more rigorous peer review of the more reputable journals), and if that paper were written by a person who's work has had to be corrected by others, not once, not twice, but FOUR times to my knowledge, and every correction takes it back in the opposite direction of what that person was arguing, and if the paper I was citing was this guy making the same old tired argument he's been corrected on before, and if this paper already had evidence of data tampering to get it's conclusions... just imagine the uproar from the usual crowjournal like the Asia - Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (which people generally publish in when they can't pass the more rigorous peer review of the more reputable journals), and if that paper were written by a person who's work has had to be corrected by others, not once, not twice, but FOUR times to my knowledge, and every correction takes it back in the opposite direction of what that person was arguing, and if the paper I was citing was this guy making the same old tired argument he's been corrected on before, and if this paper already had evidence of data tampering to get it's conclusions... just imagine the uproar from the usual crowJournal of Atmospheric Sciences (which people generally publish in when they can't pass the more rigorous peer review of the more reputable journals), and if that paper were written by a person who's work has had to be corrected by others, not once, not twice, but FOUR times to my knowledge, and every correction takes it back in the opposite direction of what that person was arguing, and if the paper I was citing was this guy making the same old tired argument he's been corrected on before, and if this paper already had evidence of data tampering to get it's conclusions... just imagine the uproar from the usual crowd here.
«An analysis of the 14,000 references cited in the Third Assessment Report found that peer - reviewed journal articles comprised 84 percent of references in Working Group I, but only 59 percent of references in Working Group II and 36 percent of references in Working Group III (Bjurström and Polk, 2010).»
Sorting this out requires reading 13 different journal articles cited in Table S9.1: an uncertainty monster taming strategy of «make the evidence difficult to find and sort out.»
«Evidence sufficient to disprove either accusation can be defined very precisely: it would consist of the p value supporting the claim of statistical insignificance, the peer - reviewed journal article in which it was presented, and the page number where the study is cited in the IPCC Report.»
In another instance, a Wall Street Journal article is one of two sources cited by the IPCC to backup the claim that «Insurance companies are introducing incentives for homeowners and businesses that invest in loss prevention strategies (Kim, 2004; Kovacs, 2005b).&raquIn another instance, a Wall Street Journal article is one of two sources cited by the IPCC to backup the claim that «Insurance companies are introducing incentives for homeowners and businesses that invest in loss prevention strategies (Kim, 2004; Kovacs, 2005b).&raquin loss prevention strategies (Kim, 2004; Kovacs, 2005b).»
Nearly 4,000 peer - reviewed articles are cited in Climate Change Reconsidered II: Physical Science, including significant representation from leading journals such as Nature and Science.
Moreover, in relation to «Climate Research,» the threat is not merely to avoid publishing in the journal but indeed to avoid citing articles from the journal, ie, effectively punishing authors of what might be presumably «good» work who had the bad luck to have picked the «wrong» journal for their work.
«We also searched highly cited articles with content related to hydrological sciences that were published in non-hydrological journals.
DeSmog investigated the submission and found that of the 304 footnote citations in the Peabody document, opinion articles published in media outlets, primarily the Wall Street Journal, were cited as supporting evidence 41 times and groups with historical ties to the fossil fuel industry such as the Cato Institute, American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity and the Global Warming Policy Foundation were cited 64 times.
Larger communities, such as the city of Richland, which was cited in a Wall Street Journal article promoting negawatts, can be enlisted in any such program sponsored by the utility.
There are lots of illogicalities cited to support the conjecture on this web site and also in many of the refereed articles that appear in scientific journals.
A search of the Science Citation Index, the comprehensive scientific journal database that indexes virtually every citation a journal article gets in the peer - reviewed scientific literature, reveals that this paper, which Dr. Singer calls a «key research publication», has been cited exactly zero times, as of 2004 (for comparison, Dr. Steven Schneider's 1988 publication in Nature on the same topic, «Simulating the climatic effects of nuclear war», has gotten 16 citations).