An oft -
cited skeptic argument is that the decrease in available temperature measuring stations during the 1990s introduces an increased bias towards warming.
Not exact matches
As a classic indicator of the modern climate
skeptic, he
cited the IPCC's conclusions as authority for the points that he believed supported his
arguments, but dismissed the IPCC's conclusions for points that did not support his
arguments.
Skeptics of the active approach often
cite this
argument: With information more and more readily available, markets are becoming ever more efficient and true alpha (or active return) is increasingly difficult to find.
Note that a similar
argument regarding polar bears is often
cited by AGW
skeptics and even Alaska's governor in her recent NYT piece about oil drilling.
As a classic indicator of the modern climate
skeptic, he
cited the IPCC's conclusions as authority for the points that he believed supported his
arguments, but dismissed the IPCC's conclusions for points that did not support his
arguments.
While it may be worthwhile to ask if the GCC ultimately did not drop
skeptic climate scientists after seeing convincing
skeptic arguments, a far bigger question to ask is this: Is it purely coincidental that Matt Pawa — of the Oakland / San Fransisco cases currently
citing old GCC material — seems to have a potential appearance of being connected with the 2009 NYT GCC documents story?
Weakening Solar Output Won't Slow Warming Over Next Century One
argument often
cited by climate
skeptics and global warming deniers is that solar cycles are responsible for at least part of the warming we're seeing now.