I recently completed a focus group in which I spoke with 30 senior
citizens about the secrets of a happy life.
Not exact matches
A few of these include scaring the nation
about both an internal and external threat; arbitrarily detaining
citizens; creating
secret prisons where torture is permitted; controlling the press; and treating political dissident as traitors.
When what happened to them is revealed, the uproar that ensues tears apart families, reputations, and even the social fabric of the city, exposing dark
secrets about some of the most powerful of its
citizens, and putting fragile loves and lives at great risk.
While it starts out as a great story
about secret agents and special ops teams,
about double crosses and not knowing who to trust, it quickly evolved into a laundry list of ways that different government agencies with obscure acronyms had the technological means and the legal ability to spy on every single
citizen.
When I cite an article like the New York Times» «
Secret «Kill List» Proves a Test of Obama's Principles and Will,» New York Times, 29 May 2012, liberals either claim ignorance («I don't know what «secret kill list» you're talking about») or deny the facts outright («that's just Republican propaganda, president Obama isn't murdering U.S. citizens without a trial!&ra
Secret «Kill List» Proves a Test of Obama's Principles and Will,» New York Times, 29 May 2012, liberals either claim ignorance («I don't know what «
secret kill list» you're talking about») or deny the facts outright («that's just Republican propaganda, president Obama isn't murdering U.S. citizens without a trial!&ra
secret kill list» you're talking
about») or deny the facts outright («that's just Republican propaganda, president Obama isn't murdering U.S.
citizens without a trial!»).
Edward Snowden may have exposed countless
secrets about the way governments are conducting cyber espionage on their own
citizens and each other, but even he couldn't have been aware that as the National Security Agency / Prism scandal broke this past summer, Aaron Shull was quietly figuring out where the legal boundaries of online spying should lie.
The case will not only provide more details
about government surveillance practices, but help to provide a better understanding of the warren of
secret laws that the government has been using to demand information
about citizens.