Sentences with phrase «citizens of certain»

A few months ago a GTA based agent made a racist remark as well as refused to provide service to citizens of certain political views in a community newspaper.
In other cases, carriers may limit the available coverage available to citizens of certain countries.
* Requires the plan to have been in effect at least 30 days ** Covers terrorist events at U.S. destinations only *** Coverage restricted to citizens of certain states **** Valid only if the U.S. government has not issued a travel warning in the six months prior to your arrival ***** Available with optional upgrade
Citizens of certain countries require a Temporary Resident Visa to enter Canada as a temporary resident.
Only citizens of certain countries require a temporary resident visa before visiting Canada.
Their project, which remained under wraps for months, takes on new meaning in light of the latest executive order, signed by Trump on Sunday, which bars citizens of certain, mostly Muslim - majority countries from entering the US.
For citizens of certain countries Canada requires a visitors visa to be obtained from their nearest Canadian Consulate before entry into Canada, please check if this is required before your trip.
In other cases, carriers may limit the available coverage available to citizens of certain countries.
Restricted Regions: XM Global Limited does not provide services for citizens of certain regions, such as the United States of America, Canada, Israel and the Islamic Republic of Iran.
USA citizens, USA lawful permanent residents, and citizens of certain other countries may apply for Global Entry.
We can't open accounts for citizens of certain restricted countries.
«For painters, [the city] was a compost, [which allowed you to be] a citizen of a certain nation and [experience] currents of international activity.

Not exact matches

Because the deal that secured the votes of the conservative House sect known as the Freedom Caucus, allows states to seek waivers that let them opt out of basic protections for some citizens — rules, for example, that prevent insurers from charging virtually anything they want to «cover» those with preexisting conditions or that demand that insurers provide certain basic health and preventive care services.
This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or circumstances that may be relevant to holders subject to special rules under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation, certain former citizens or long - term residents of the United States, partnerships or other pass - through entities, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, «controlled foreign corporations,» «passive foreign investment companies,» corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, banks, financial institutions, investment funds, insurance companies, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies, tax - exempt organizations, tax - qualified retirement plans, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that own, or have owned, actually or constructively, more than 5 % of our common stock and persons holding our common stock as part of a hedging or conversion transaction or straddle, or a constructive sale, or other risk reduction strategy.
Tax schedule or table helps the citizens determine the value of the tax incurred for a certain year.
Universal Basic Income is the idea that all citizens should receive a certain amount of money from the government, with no regulations on spending attached.
Citizens of other countries where the financial system was crippled or injured are much more aggressive in their support for radical surgery, such as certain provisions embedded in the U.S. financial reform bill.
A certain tension is built into their official canons of ethics, e.g., «A lawyer is a representative of clients, an officer of the legal system, and a public citizen having special responsibility for the quality of justice.»
In a book called «On the Road to Civilisation, A World History» (Philadelphia 1937) it said, «Early Christianity was little understood and was regarded with little favour by those who ruled the pagan world... Christians refused to share certain duties of Roman Citizens... they would not hold political office.»
THE POOR OF LYONS HAD THEIR ORIGINS around the year 1170, founded by a certain Lyonese citizen by the name of Vadensius or Valdenses, after whom his followers took their namOF LYONS HAD THEIR ORIGINS around the year 1170, founded by a certain Lyonese citizen by the name of Vadensius or Valdenses, after whom his followers took their namof Vadensius or Valdenses, after whom his followers took their name.
We should urgently instigate an inquiry into the resources held abroad by the rich citizens of the peripheral countries and the resultant expropriation, in certain cases, of these resources if they have been gained through means such as theft committed at the expense of the population of the peripheral countries (expropriated wealth should be returned to the people).
For example, no government can deny the right of its citizens to marry, but every state has certain marriage regulations: minimum age, one spouse at a time, opposite sex, blood test, a license.
The Texas statute undeniably seeks to further the belief of its citizens that certain forms of sexual behavior are «immoral and unacceptable,»... the same interest furthered by criminal laws against fornication, bigamy, adultery, adult incest, bestiality, and obscenity,» Scalia wrote in dissent.
This power came about because the FCC, which is charged with making certain the airwaves are used to meet the needs of the entire community and that all issues of importance to citizens are thoroughly aired, has failed in its task.
Conscience sometimes drives citizens to certain actions — for example, nonpayment of taxes — which can not be condoned and against which sanctions must be brought.
If the point of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation of the good qualities of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?
There are certain inherent difficulties in considering the ethical dilemmas of citizens in relation to the State.
I don't know about your country, but in mine, that particular word — «socialism» — was transformed long ago into just an ordinary truncheon used by certain cynical, parvenu bureaucrats to bludgeon their liberal - minded fellow citizens from morning until night, labeling them «enemies of socialism» and «antisocialist forces.
Not only are more people classified as «poor» than ever before, but the underclass, composed largely of blacks and Hispanics, is locked into an intergenerational pattern of «dependency» that makes it almost certain that millions of people will never become self - supporting and law - abiding citizens.
If you are so religious and such a good Christian (Derp and other commentors) why would you do business with a company who then turns around and gives a part of that money to a hate group that has openly stated they would prefer the government take certain citizens of this country out and SHOOT them.
Then he turned to more individualistic terms to define fairness as «a bargain in American life»: «When you work hard and pay your taxes; when you're a good parent and citizen; when you obey the law and play by the rules you have a right to expect certain things in exchange, as a part of the bargain.
Wouldn't you say that a company that claims to be Christian, takes your money and then turns around and gives it to an organization who has openly stated they would prefer the government would take certain citizens of this country out and SHOOT them is Christian?
In the middle: 24 percent of evangelicals say Dreamers should be allowed to stay and become legal residents, but not citizens, if they meet certain legal requirements.
These laws govern the lives of the citizens; they set out to improve certain conditions and to create other conditions; they determine what is right and may be done and what is wrong and may not be done?
Cf. G. von Rad, Studies in Deuteronomy, in the series Studies in Biblical Theology, London, 1953, p. 63: «We may take it as certain that the term means the free, property - owning, full citizens of Judah.»
Or you are saying that all those outside the Catholic church in general are not called by God to do anything because of a ritual (baptism / confirmation in a certain church) and therefore are «second class citizens».
It invents an arbitrary line between citizen - enemies and alien enemy combatants, holding that flexible and uncertain rights to a «hearing» on their combatant status must be accorded to certain classes of combatants.
Working with our youngest citizens requires specialized training and experience, and IMH Endorsement ® ensures professionals have attained a certain level of expertise with very young children and their families.
Any applicant that was born outside the US who is a current citizen or has a valid Social Security Number is eligible for donation; with the exception of those that have lived in certain European countries during a specific time period.
This view is entirely incompatible with the progressive notion that government is analogous to a safety net, a provider of public goods that enables its citizens to achieve a certain quality of life.
By engaging citizens in a wider discussion, it is shaping a certain type of Romanian citizen, a critical one, capable of engaging in civilized discussions with his fellow citizens, of taking action whenever needed and of holding the political leaders accountable for their actions.
This answer is certain to be the demographics of the Dutch citizens living abroad, but let's look at the context to narrow it down.
If a proposed idea reaches a certain number of up - votes then all citizens of a country are able to directly cast their votes and if the majority of citizens agree with the proposed bill, then it becomes a law.
Is there any law which prohibits foreigners (non-US citizens) from spending billions of dollars to sway U.S. elections by deliberately placing attack ads against certain political parties?
My interest in this whole issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner of persons regardless of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where citizens of Ghana who may belong to certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling of critical national issues in view of some of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a country?
His statement yesterday denigrating gays and lesbians is a continuation of his thoughtless and harmful language aimed at certain groups of our state's citizens,» Duffy said in a statement forwarded by Cuomo's campaign.
Many oil or mineral rich monarchies or authoritarian regimes use nationalized / royalty owned oil and / or mineral wealth to dramatically limit domestic taxation and to fund a welfare state for average citizens, sometimes with straight cash dispersals, sometimes with heavily subsidized prices for certain essentials of life, and sometimes by heavily subsidizing services like health care and education.
In a modern setting, and applied to the US constitution, McCormick suggests that the tribunate would consists of 51 randomly selected citizens who could only be drawn from households below a certain net income.
and in addition, if a significant portion (even a small minority) of the parliament asks for referendum, they can ask a certain number of citizens to sign the referendum, and if this certain number of signatures is reached, a referendum is held.
An early voice to raise the alarm about the emerging threat of Nazi Germany, she was an outspoken critic of appeasement, telling the House in 1933 that the NSDAP were «inflicting cruelties and crushing disabilities on large numbers of law - abiding peaceful German citizens, whose only offence is that they belong to a particular race or religion or profess certain political beliefs.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z