A few months ago a GTA based agent made a racist remark as well as refused to provide service to
citizens of certain political views in a community newspaper.
In other cases, carriers may limit the available coverage available to
citizens of certain countries.
* Requires the plan to have been in effect at least 30 days ** Covers terrorist events at U.S. destinations only *** Coverage restricted to
citizens of certain states **** Valid only if the U.S. government has not issued a travel warning in the six months prior to your arrival ***** Available with optional upgrade
Citizens of certain countries require a Temporary Resident Visa to enter Canada as a temporary resident.
Only
citizens of certain countries require a temporary resident visa before visiting Canada.
Their project, which remained under wraps for months, takes on new meaning in light of the latest executive order, signed by Trump on Sunday, which bars
citizens of certain, mostly Muslim - majority countries from entering the US.
For
citizens of certain countries Canada requires a visitors visa to be obtained from their nearest Canadian Consulate before entry into Canada, please check if this is required before your trip.
In other cases, carriers may limit the available coverage available to
citizens of certain countries.
Restricted Regions: XM Global Limited does not provide services for
citizens of certain regions, such as the United States of America, Canada, Israel and the Islamic Republic of Iran.
USA citizens, USA lawful permanent residents, and
citizens of certain other countries may apply for Global Entry.
We can't open accounts for
citizens of certain restricted countries.
«For painters, [the city] was a compost, [which allowed you to be]
a citizen of a certain nation and [experience] currents of international activity.
Not exact matches
Because the deal that secured the votes
of the conservative House sect known as the Freedom Caucus, allows states to seek waivers that let them opt out
of basic protections for some
citizens — rules, for example, that prevent insurers from charging virtually anything they want to «cover» those with preexisting conditions or that demand that insurers provide
certain basic health and preventive care services.
This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or circumstances that may be relevant to holders subject to special rules under the U.S. federal income tax laws, including, without limitation,
certain former
citizens or long - term residents
of the United States, partnerships or other pass - through entities, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies, «controlled foreign corporations,» «passive foreign investment companies,» corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid U.S. federal income tax, banks, financial institutions, investment funds, insurance companies, brokers, dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies, tax - exempt organizations, tax - qualified retirement plans, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons that own, or have owned, actually or constructively, more than 5 %
of our common stock and persons holding our common stock as part
of a hedging or conversion transaction or straddle, or a constructive sale, or other risk reduction strategy.
Tax schedule or table helps the
citizens determine the value
of the tax incurred for a
certain year.
Universal Basic Income is the idea that all
citizens should receive a
certain amount
of money from the government, with no regulations on spending attached.
Citizens of other countries where the financial system was crippled or injured are much more aggressive in their support for radical surgery, such as
certain provisions embedded in the U.S. financial reform bill.
A
certain tension is built into their official canons
of ethics, e.g., «A lawyer is a representative
of clients, an officer
of the legal system, and a public
citizen having special responsibility for the quality
of justice.»
In a book called «On the Road to Civilisation, A World History» (Philadelphia 1937) it said, «Early Christianity was little understood and was regarded with little favour by those who ruled the pagan world... Christians refused to share
certain duties
of Roman
Citizens... they would not hold political office.»
THE POOR
OF LYONS HAD THEIR ORIGINS around the year 1170, founded by a certain Lyonese citizen by the name of Vadensius or Valdenses, after whom his followers took their nam
OF LYONS HAD THEIR ORIGINS around the year 1170, founded by a
certain Lyonese
citizen by the name
of Vadensius or Valdenses, after whom his followers took their nam
of Vadensius or Valdenses, after whom his followers took their name.
We should urgently instigate an inquiry into the resources held abroad by the rich
citizens of the peripheral countries and the resultant expropriation, in
certain cases,
of these resources if they have been gained through means such as theft committed at the expense
of the population
of the peripheral countries (expropriated wealth should be returned to the people).
For example, no government can deny the right
of its
citizens to marry, but every state has
certain marriage regulations: minimum age, one spouse at a time, opposite sex, blood test, a license.
The Texas statute undeniably seeks to further the belief
of its
citizens that
certain forms
of sexual behavior are «immoral and unacceptable,»... the same interest furthered by criminal laws against fornication, bigamy, adultery, adult incest, bestiality, and obscenity,» Scalia wrote in dissent.
This power came about because the FCC, which is charged with making
certain the airwaves are used to meet the needs
of the entire community and that all issues
of importance to
citizens are thoroughly aired, has failed in its task.
Conscience sometimes drives
citizens to
certain actions — for example, nonpayment
of taxes — which can not be condoned and against which sanctions must be brought.
If the point
of religion is to bring peace and guide a culture toward
certain specific behaviors, primarily for order and the preservation
of the good qualities
of society, then how can one say that one religion is better than another or that a «religion-less» person who STILL acts the SAME way (i.e. does right unto their neighbors, lives according to the thing the bible suggests) but is more tolerant is not as high quality a
citizen as another who is associated with a Major League Religious Team?
There are
certain inherent difficulties in considering the ethical dilemmas
of citizens in relation to the State.
I don't know about your country, but in mine, that particular word — «socialism» — was transformed long ago into just an ordinary truncheon used by
certain cynical, parvenu bureaucrats to bludgeon their liberal - minded fellow
citizens from morning until night, labeling them «enemies
of socialism» and «antisocialist forces.
Not only are more people classified as «poor» than ever before, but the underclass, composed largely
of blacks and Hispanics, is locked into an intergenerational pattern
of «dependency» that makes it almost
certain that millions
of people will never become self - supporting and law - abiding
citizens.
If you are so religious and such a good Christian (Derp and other commentors) why would you do business with a company who then turns around and gives a part
of that money to a hate group that has openly stated they would prefer the government take
certain citizens of this country out and SHOOT them.
Then he turned to more individualistic terms to define fairness as «a bargain in American life»: «When you work hard and pay your taxes; when you're a good parent and
citizen; when you obey the law and play by the rules you have a right to expect
certain things in exchange, as a part
of the bargain.
Wouldn't you say that a company that claims to be Christian, takes your money and then turns around and gives it to an organization who has openly stated they would prefer the government would take
certain citizens of this country out and SHOOT them is Christian?
In the middle: 24 percent
of evangelicals say Dreamers should be allowed to stay and become legal residents, but not
citizens, if they meet
certain legal requirements.
These laws govern the lives
of the
citizens; they set out to improve
certain conditions and to create other conditions; they determine what is right and may be done and what is wrong and may not be done?
Cf. G. von Rad, Studies in Deuteronomy, in the series Studies in Biblical Theology, London, 1953, p. 63: «We may take it as
certain that the term means the free, property - owning, full
citizens of Judah.»
Or you are saying that all those outside the Catholic church in general are not called by God to do anything because
of a ritual (baptism / confirmation in a
certain church) and therefore are «second class
citizens».
It invents an arbitrary line between
citizen - enemies and alien enemy combatants, holding that flexible and uncertain rights to a «hearing» on their combatant status must be accorded to
certain classes
of combatants.
Working with our youngest
citizens requires specialized training and experience, and IMH Endorsement ® ensures professionals have attained a
certain level
of expertise with very young children and their families.
Any applicant that was born outside the US who is a current
citizen or has a valid Social Security Number is eligible for donation; with the exception
of those that have lived in
certain European countries during a specific time period.
This view is entirely incompatible with the progressive notion that government is analogous to a safety net, a provider
of public goods that enables its
citizens to achieve a
certain quality
of life.
By engaging
citizens in a wider discussion, it is shaping a
certain type
of Romanian
citizen, a critical one, capable
of engaging in civilized discussions with his fellow
citizens,
of taking action whenever needed and
of holding the political leaders accountable for their actions.
This answer is
certain to be the demographics
of the Dutch
citizens living abroad, but let's look at the context to narrow it down.
If a proposed idea reaches a
certain number
of up - votes then all
citizens of a country are able to directly cast their votes and if the majority
of citizens agree with the proposed bill, then it becomes a law.
Is there any law which prohibits foreigners (non-US
citizens) from spending billions
of dollars to sway U.S. elections by deliberately placing attack ads against
certain political parties?
My interest in this whole issue comes from the fact that if our law courts especially the highest court in Ghana, Supreme Court that is supposed to be final place in the country to deliver justice to all manner
of persons regardless
of one's political affiliation, religious beliefs, ethnic background etc in a just and fair manner is now seen to be turning into a place where
citizens of Ghana who may belong to
certain political affiliations do not feel confident or have trust in their handling
of critical national issues in view
of some
of these «partisan» pronouncements on the part
of some justices, then where would we be heading towards as a country?
His statement yesterday denigrating gays and lesbians is a continuation
of his thoughtless and harmful language aimed at
certain groups
of our state's
citizens,» Duffy said in a statement forwarded by Cuomo's campaign.
Many oil or mineral rich monarchies or authoritarian regimes use nationalized / royalty owned oil and / or mineral wealth to dramatically limit domestic taxation and to fund a welfare state for average
citizens, sometimes with straight cash dispersals, sometimes with heavily subsidized prices for
certain essentials
of life, and sometimes by heavily subsidizing services like health care and education.
In a modern setting, and applied to the US constitution, McCormick suggests that the tribunate would consists
of 51 randomly selected
citizens who could only be drawn from households below a
certain net income.
and in addition, if a significant portion (even a small minority)
of the parliament asks for referendum, they can ask a
certain number
of citizens to sign the referendum, and if this
certain number
of signatures is reached, a referendum is held.
An early voice to raise the alarm about the emerging threat
of Nazi Germany, she was an outspoken critic
of appeasement, telling the House in 1933 that the NSDAP were «inflicting cruelties and crushing disabilities on large numbers
of law - abiding peaceful German
citizens, whose only offence is that they belong to a particular race or religion or profess
certain political beliefs.»