Sentences with phrase «city rule amendments»

Not exact matches

The city's law prohibiting employers from asking candidates to reveal their past salaries violates the First Amendment's free - speech clause, ruled U.S. District Judge Mitchell S. Goldberg.

He is part of a lawsuit against the city that argues the rules violate their First Amendment rights.

The 102 - to - 50 vote was not final, however, and an amendment offered by opponents of the bill appeared to radically alter the intent of the home - rule petition, which is being sought by the the city council and Mayor Raymond L. Flynn.

The conference and community event will examine the context, decisions, choices, and legacy of the 1974 federal court ruling that school assignment of children in the City of Boston was in violation of the 14th amendment of the constitution.

In City & County of Denver v. State of Colorado, the Court ruled the Denver ordinance, D.R.M.C.  § 8 - 552 which bans pit bulls, was not pre-empted by the passage of  § 18 -9-204.5 (5 (b) and is valid under the Stateâ $ ™ s Home Rule Amendment, Art.

Colorado § 18 -9-204.5 (5)(b) except see the case of City & County of Denver v. State of Colorado, in which the Court ruled Denver ordinance, D.R.M.C. § 8 - 552 which bans pit bulls was not pre-empted by § 18 -9-204.5 (5 (b) and is valid under the State Home Rule Amendment, Art.

SCOTUS noted in Martin v. City of Struthers that «Whether such visiting shall be permitted has in general been deemed to depend upon the will of the individual master of each household, and not upon the determination of the community» and ruled that Struthers may not «make this decision for all its inhabitants» (on First Amendment grounds).

The amendment allows for preemption by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations over any differing city or county rules on the subject.

During a markup session of IVAWA today, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 11 to 8 to reject an amendment offered by Senator Wicker (R - MS), that would have barred organizations that receive funding under the act from using their own funds to perform or advocate for abortions, a policy that is akin to the Mexico City Policy, also known as the global gag rule.