Sentences with phrase «city spent buying»
Jesus you are not writing a book get to the point Also I have to agree, we already have one dodgy Russian billionaire (can't even bring myself to mention his name) who nearly ruined the premier league by pumping cash into Chelski somewhere like 800 million (who can count it this stage) I won't even mention how much city spent buying the league also.
http://www.justarsenal.com/ Not exact matches
Increasingly, young people are moving into cities to rent, not buy, and many prefer to spend their money on experiences rather than material goods.
... «[Our cats] sleep in our beds and we spend a lot of money buying them toys we think they'll like,» says Christina Ha, co-founder of Meow Parlour, New York City's first cat café.
We don't need a child when the likes of Man U, City, looserpool are spending big and buying good, I have to admit.
There is no guarantee for ANY club in PL to win the title (ask Man City and Utd who spent hundreds of millions last year and could not buy the Title!)
The one team I expect to go backward is Manchester City, who have managed to spend big again, but are arguably yet to buy a player who will improve their team.
Good players can come cheap, you saying «let City, United, Chelsea and even Liverpool buy the good players» would seem to indicate that good players MUST cost a fortune as it is in reply to someone saying you don't have to spend loads, this is not the case as LC have proven.
Moving on from it all for this season i fear for worst to come next season (just had a deja vu i say the same thing every season around this time) City already are talking spending 600 Million in the next two to three years on new players and you can bet Man - U will follow to try and close the gap, Liverpool can sell one player and buy an entire squad, Chelsea owner Abromovich has started to make noise's about next season so they will be spending, spuds will try to keep their existing players with one or two additions to strengthen and some salary rises to keep the elite, and Arsenal will go head to head with the likes of Burnley Everton Leicester for average players signature, and the board will make sure even if they replace AW they will replace him with AW No2 who will do what the board decides on who and how much to spend
After Bacary Sagna left for Manchester City last summer, Jenkinson was hopeful of being an automatic starter in the team, but he realised when Wenger bought Debuchy that he would be spending most of his time on the bench again.
Whilst City, United and Chelsea can spend around # 30M on Mangala, Shaw and Stones we buy Alexis Sanchez for similar money.
I think the advent of the bilioners who are ready to spend buying up Chelsea, Man City, Man Utd and Liverpool has put end to the owner take profit thinking of Stan Kroenke.
We are not Chelsea or Man City to spend that amount of money after buying Debuchy, Sanchez, Chambers already.
The thing that makes me laugh is the fact that, some Arsenal fans will call Chelsea's and Man United and City Fan's plastic or refer to them as «rent boys», because they celebrate success that in all honesty have just been bought, but the irony in that sentiment is those very same people will moan about how «we don't spend enough» and grow impatient over Arsenal spending policies....
Well to a point they are right, maybe we are luckier than your average PL club, but then we are NOT your average PL club, we are charged the highest ticket prices of any club in the EPL for starter's and we are now apparently debt free and according to certain sources inside the clubs Hierarchy can buy any player we want, in short we are financially as big as any of our competition with regards to the ability to buy in top quality talent, and while we don't have the money to burn that Man city or Chelsea have we are in a position to spend more and spend it more often as long as there is a degree of prudence.
As for new transfer signings, I'm expecting the panic buying frenzy (Spending for the sake of it) to officially start after we lose at Leicester City?
City has made it clear they will spend a lot when the window opens Manchester United as started and Chelsea will if we don't buy the 3 - 4 players that's needed we will become 4 th next season.
Vast majority of fans subscribe to Wengers youth policy and do not want the club to spend like City & chelsea and buy top players in every position.
As with most national players being bought and sold in the top division, Manchester City will have to spend big to secure their signatures.
Don't care if City are saving face as they'll will probably end up buying a young talent, we have been linked with and make him a star, don't care if United seem to have and endless amount of money to spend and out pay there rivals, don't care if Myk hasn't been signed in time so he won't be able to play this weekend and even if he was Wenger wouldn't of thrown in him straight away without training with us first.
We heard that those who spend big win trophy but what what Leicester City??!! As you said their entire team is not worth what Ozil widths!!!! This guy is at the end of the road in my opinion today he said ticket price is high because we spend TV REVENUE to buy players what a stinking liar!!!
Di maria on the bench and you can expect man u carry on trying to buy results with more crazy spending this summer but it does nt mean it will work.man city with the ageing team they will be forced to go thru changes that what jose said.
That does not mean that I agree with the sort of scattergun spending we have seen from the likes of Chelsea, Man City, Tottenham and more in the last 10 years, but if the boss decides that a player is right for Arsenal then should he just cough up the cash and stop trying to buy champagne at lemonade prices?
Not strictly true, Manure have spent way more, Liverpool have spent more, as have Manchester City, although their overall spending has come slightly under ours due to Roma making Djeko's transfer deal permanent, but then they have bought what's regarded as the best manager in the world, which doesn't come into player spending.
Im not sure your comment is correct... everyone starts somewhere at a reasonable price Cesc was free and turned into a valuable player Bellerin — similar and valued at # 50mn now apparently Kante — bought for nothing and won 2 premier leagues in a row Vardy from non-league to England and prem league title Mahrez — 400k Holding — looks good and only # 2mn Mbappe — last year was # 230k now # 100mn Teams like Man City, Chelsea and Man Utd plus eg Monaco and others just pay silly money which inflates the price and then «fans» feel their clubs have to spend the same....
But to be fair, they bought 8 - 10 player's with that money, whereas City, Chelsea and Utd normally spend 3 times that amount of money on 3 - 4 player's and it is them 3 clubs that have been the most successful in the past decade.
Now that Liverfool made a fool out of City by forcing them to spend 50m for Sterling they will show us deluded fans who keep babbling that there arent many players out there to buy from that actually avaible for the right money.
Today: City are unbeatable Giroud is useless» We spent 30 mill on Sanchez he is our marquee buy.
But easy to say negative things when your an addict of negative making negative statements we did nt win everything every year tottenham has been behind us till this year for 2o years mu went through 3 managers then got mourinho and he said hi i see you have billlions of dollars to spend why do nt you buy a team ill smile for three years make some dumb comments win a title chelsea not yet mu cause you spent more money than anyone else has except those city folks recently and play fall asleep football i mean wenger is great and haters gonna hate cause thats all they know to do they'll hate till we win the title then be happy for a day once its confirmed then say well we did nt win champions leauge or vice versa cause they re a negative addict they nead their dose to disassemble true success
Biggest Concern is with Arsenal that they can not spend on transfers the way City, Chelsea and United can... And if Ozil and Sanchez leaves this summer then we would Require 3 players in squad including 1 striker but certainly we don't that much Financial strength to spend 150 Millions for buying 3 players... We would only able to replace either Ozil or Sanchez or none of them if buy any striker...
Yes Man City is spending like crazy but why didn't we go for Youri Tielemans that was just bought from Monaco (20m) or complete a deal for Dembélé (less than 20m) last year or Aubameyang before he moved to Dortmund or even Higuain when he was «offered» to clubs and Matuidi now.
We all know that the small budget was due to two factors: construction of the stadium and billionaires who bought Chelsea and Man City and we're engaged in spending sprees.
Buying the league is the worst thing they can do because when VanGaal leaves they will have to rebuild from scratch and spend another 100m, FFP won't allow it to happen like they're currently doing with Man City
Arsenal spent 36 mill to buy Sanchez and now want 70 mill from City.
I'd rather our team than a Man U who have spent loads and expect miracles, or a City who have bought loads in the recent past but are now faltering, or a Spurs who can not seem to find that high level they think they deserve, or a Chelsea who everyone expects to win the title... no pressure for them eh?
i don't think now is time to take chances, i hear Man - U will spend 350 million pounds in the next two years Chelsea who is already a full squad and still toying with the idea of buying Messi, City will sell few deadwood and buy big and we are thinking of signing 38 year old striker, i love TH but come on guys we are suppose to be fighting back to greatness and catch up to Europe's elite, Man - U is linked wit every player we the Arsenal supporters are asking for and guess who will buy them.
The idea that Manchester City are ready to spend big again after buying John Stones in the summer is surprising, but perfectly possible.
I wonder if we will challenge for the title next season with United spending some of their # 750 million advertising money on summer signings, Chelski already buying Cuadrado, City signing Bony and more in the summer.
if i were the arsenal manager, i would have sold jw to man city for 40m, then sell ozil to juve for another 40m or more and that would leave me with 130m to spend... i would then buy schneiderlin for 23m, make carzola play the number 10 position, convince tevez to play for one more season then buy reus for 45m, then spend the rest on top quality youngsters like that roma defender and voila!
, you first say city spent # 280 m on their defence when I pointed out you were wrong you also want to include the subs Just remember auba and lacca Cost similar fees to the city defenders And your answer buy the club Is childish
How come Man City — a club which has made a profit only twice since Mansour bought them in 2008, and whose cumulate profits have been far less than Arsenal's over the past 10 + seasons — can still spend money like water (or should that be oil) through the period?
why always Arsenal buy the chip pleyer, don't whant to spend the money like Manchester U, city, chelsea, Tt hospurs.Situation like Fabrigas, Van perse, Nasr, and now is Walcot.I REMEMBER WHEN PATRIK VIERA HE TOLD YOU 2006, NOW I PROVE IS TRUE TRUE.Your in Arsenal for money now but not for any troph.
Fernandinho spent eight seasons at Shakhtar before Manchester City bought him in 2013, Jadson played for seven years before returning to Sao Paulo.
Jose Mourinho's declaration that # 300 million was «not enough» to spend in the market in order to compete with a Manchester City side who «buy full - backs for the price of strikers» placed transfer fees on the agenda this week, even before Liverpool's head - spinning outlay on Virgil van Dijk ensured it remained the talking point.
Fans from outside of Liverpool are deemed more beneficial to the clubs owners as when they come to watch a Liverpool match they are the ones who spend money buying merchandise in the club shop and spending big in and around the city of Liverpool itself.
City aren't THAT financially doped by the way, they only spent # 25m more per season than Man Utd over the last five years, and you # 25m buys you shit thesedays.
Sam Allardyce has bemoaned his lack of summer buys and hinted that clubs such as Man City and Real Madrid had driven up the price of every player because of their crazy spending limits.
Deeply agree with you guys, where is Arsenal team we used to watch???? Where in the world is it???? Really really desapointed.I think this is the worse Arsenal team Ive ever seen.i know these guys are talented but may be AW worship them so much as stars so that they spend their time with Chicks and do nt have the force to fight on the pitch anymore.No encouragement from the coach, nor the assistant.Arsenal only thinks about making money, forcing the fans to support these young players, focusing on the idea of producing stars and sell them afterward but not buying stars to win games.I was really pssd off when I watch the Liverpool game agst hull city, Both teams were so alive and all strong during the game, fast play, pass accuracy, dynamism, combativity, never give up minded on evry single minute they fought for the ball.ManU had a draw today but You could see that they were fighting till the end.I do nt know WHAT DID WE DO TO WIN AGST MANU AND CHELSKI?????.
United boss Mourinho, who said he was unlikely to buy anyone in January, recently bemoaned his club's inability to invest up to» # 700 million» in new players, claiming Premier League leaders City have the advantage of unlimited spending power.
If Kris truly wanted to live in Minnesota and Kim couldn't imagine leaving L.A., they could have easily bought a house in both cities and spent some time in each.
Tom Manning, the vice president of a New York City - based nonprofit that serves homeless youth, says his organization, Covenant House, spends about 33 cents per diaper buying in bulk.