But one type of fallout that is anticipated with less frequency than those previously mentioned is the possibility of
a civil claim for relief brought by the victims in a crash.
«Testimony Regarding AB 2643 Revenge Porn
Civil Claim for Relief,» Hearing of Judiciary Committee of California Assembly, 2014
Not exact matches
The Enrollment Program also authorizes a superior court to have jurisdiction over enrollees by allowing it to «appoint a receiver, monitor, conservator, or other designated fiduciary or officer of the court
for a defendant or the defendant's assets,» as well as authorizes the Commissioner of Business Oversight to «include in
civil actions
claims for ancillary
relief, including restitution and disgorgement, on behalf of a person injured, as well as attorney's fees and costs, and
civil penalties of up to $ 25,000»
for up to four years after the purported violation occurred and «refer evidence regarding violations of the bill's provisions to the Attorney General, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the United States Department of the Treasury, or the district attorney of the county in which the violation occurred, who would be authorized, with or without this type of a reference, to institute appropriate proceedings.»
Although under some laws HBO may have a right to an award of attorneys» fees and expenses if it prevails in an arbitration, HBO agrees that it will seek such an award only in the event that the substance of your
claim or the
relief sought has been deemed by the arbitrator to be frivolous or brought
for an improper purpose (as measured by the standards set forth in Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 11 (b)-RRB-.
Fortunately, Illinois state laws are designed to protect victims who are injured in collisions by allowing them to seek
relief for their losses through the use of a
civil claim for damages.
Though these victims can not erase a collision, they may be entitled to
relief through the use of a
civil claim for damages, which is separate and distinct from any traffic - related charges that may be brought by the State of Illinois.
Our expertise in the pursuit and defence of
civil fraud
claims, particularly in the commercial context, extends from the early advisory stages and the obtaining (or resisting) of urgent freezing and search order
relief (including dealing with the cross-jurisdictional issues that may arise and enforcement through applications
for contempt and other measures), through to trial and the tracing and recovery of assets both in the UK and internationally.
The focus of his work in this area typically arises out of
claims for interim injunctive
relief where issues of jurisdiction arise (including under the Recast Brussels Regulation), and injunctions in support of foreign proceedings (under section 25
Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982).
Though nothing can erase these crashes from happening, the victims may be entitled to seek
relief through the use of a
civil claim for damages.
Instead, there are two bases of
claim in the Lithuanian Civil Claim, namely (1) a claim for in personam relief under the law of unjust enrichment because there was no commercial justification for the various transactions, seeking the reversal of that unjust enrichment; and (2) a claim for a declaration that the various transfer instructions were null and void and that Snoras remains the beneficial owner of the relevant assets; this is said to be a claim for an in rem (or proprietorial) remedy.&r
claim in the Lithuanian
Civil Claim, namely (1) a claim for in personam relief under the law of unjust enrichment because there was no commercial justification for the various transactions, seeking the reversal of that unjust enrichment; and (2) a claim for a declaration that the various transfer instructions were null and void and that Snoras remains the beneficial owner of the relevant assets; this is said to be a claim for an in rem (or proprietorial) remedy.&r
Claim, namely (1) a
claim for in personam relief under the law of unjust enrichment because there was no commercial justification for the various transactions, seeking the reversal of that unjust enrichment; and (2) a claim for a declaration that the various transfer instructions were null and void and that Snoras remains the beneficial owner of the relevant assets; this is said to be a claim for an in rem (or proprietorial) remedy.&r
claim for in personam
relief under the law of unjust enrichment because there was no commercial justification
for the various transactions, seeking the reversal of that unjust enrichment; and (2) a
claim for a declaration that the various transfer instructions were null and void and that Snoras remains the beneficial owner of the relevant assets; this is said to be a claim for an in rem (or proprietorial) remedy.&r
claim for a declaration that the various transfer instructions were null and void and that Snoras remains the beneficial owner of the relevant assets; this is said to be a
claim for an in rem (or proprietorial) remedy.&r
claim for an in rem (or proprietorial) remedy.»
The wife's request was dismissed, but the court clarified that she could be added to the
civil action if she wished,
for the purpose of asserting any dependent's
relief claim under the Family Law Act.
If the arbitrator finds that either the substance of your
claim or the
relief sought in the Demand is frivolous or brought
for an improper purpose (as measured by the standards set forth in Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 11 (b)-RRB-, then the payment of all AAA filing, administration, and arbitrator fees will be governed by the AAA Rules.
Legal Assistance to Institutionalized Persons, Location 2011 — Present «Legal Aid» Clinical Intern Accountable
for representing state prisoners in
civil and criminal
claims, including post-conviction
relief and appeals.