Criminal contempt sanctions are the same as
civil contempt sanctions except they can not be purged.
Not exact matches
Can
contempt of custody, visitation and child related restraint issues truly be remedied by
civil rather than criminal
sanctions?
Since the
contempt initially sought is
civil in nature, the contemptuous party is entitled to «purge» the
contempt — that is, given some opportunity to avoid these
sanctions.
Civil contempt hearings are typically bifurcated into two phases: the first dealing with whether or not the party is in
contempt; and the second dealing with the appropriate remedy or
sanction.
A contemnor is subject to a range of judicial
sanctions which, to a large extent, depends on whether the
contempt was
civil contempt or criminal
contempt.
A
contempt sanction is
civil if it is «remedial» but criminal if «punitive.»
He called my attention to the case of Chiang (and Trustee of) v. Chiang, [2009] O.J. 41 where the Court of Appeal observed that custodial sentences for
civil contempt are rare, and that ordinarily incarceration is a
sanction of last resort.