It's great to have
a civil debate without people getting upset.
Not exact matches
We can
debate the «were a Christian nation» thing back and forth
without getting anywhere, but to imply that the freedoms we have now came only from Christian roots ignores the rest of world history as well as the fact that its often been the Church impeding
civil liberties and progressive movements.
Iain, I agree with your sentiments and in an ideal world politics should be clean and all about parties being
civil,
debating issues and policies with the press reporting on it
without bias, but British politics is a dirty business.
Drawing on this perspective, while employing both economic theory and market history, we hope to better inform the energy
debate in a
civil but forceful manner,
without recourse to political partisanship or ideological cant.
So, it's a Good Thing for political decisions to be made by unaccountable bodies,
without either
debate or due democratic process, if it will lead to a reduction in CO2 — because «scientists say so» — but it's «undemocratic» to loosen planning law (if that is what is being proposed) so that new houses and
civil infrastructure can be built
without interruption from organisations such as itself.
[19] Parliamentary privilege is essentially the «cornerstone of parliamentary democracy» [20] in that it secures the protection of elected members of Parliament to speak freely and
debate freely on all proceedings in the legislatures and Parliament
without risk of
civil or criminal liability or any interference from the court.