A judgment is a legal term used when a plaintiff files and wins
a civil lawsuit against a defendant.
Not exact matches
«Judicial hellholes» generally are defined as «places where judges systematically apply laws and court procedures in an unfair and unbalanced manner, generally
against defendants in
civil lawsuits.»
«Judicial Hellholes are places where judges systematically apply laws and court procedures in an unfair and unbalanced manner, generally
against defendants, in
civil lawsuits.»
However, there is a provision in our Rules of
Civil Procedure that permits a plaintiff to unilaterally discontinue its
lawsuit against a
defendant, provided the
lawsuit has not advanced past the stage of exchanging the claim and the defences (known more technically as the «close of pleadings»).
For
civil lawsuit, if the
civil lawsuit brought
against a citizen shall be under the jurisdictionof the people's court located in the place where the
defendant has hisdomicile, if the
defendant's domicile is different from his habitual residence, the
lawsuit shall be under the jurisdiction of the people's court located inthe place of his habitual residence.
Another reason that victims of alcohol or drug related accidents should seek competent legal counsel and file a
civil action
against the
defendant instead of hoping for criminal restitution is that the standard of proof required to win an Indiana personal injury
lawsuit is less than what a prosecutor must prove to convict a
defendant on criminal charges.
In a formal
lawsuit, a Personal Injury case is typically initiated when a private individual (the «plaintiff») files a
civil complaint
against another person or legal entity (the «
defendant»).
Gabe is skilled at defending tribes and Indian - owned enterprises
against legal attack by local, state and federal government and private parties; advocating for tribal members in disenrollment or
civil rights defense; and representing tribal plaintiffs and
defendants in catastrophic personal injury
lawsuits.
3/4/08 - Former
defendant Anthony Ciolli filed a
lawsuit in Pennsylvania state court
against the plaintiffs, their lawyers, and other
defendants for wrongful initiation of
civil proceedings, abuse of process, libel, slander, false light invasion of privacy, tortious interference with contract, and unauthorized use of name or likeness.